Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Monoblock Tibial Component

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 785-792

  O'Keefe, Thomas J ^a   Winter, Suzanne ^a   Lewallen, David G ^b   Robertson, Douglas D ^c   Poggie, Robert A ^d  

^a Saint Joseph Mercy Health System   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d BioVera   (United States)

Author keywords

Knee arthroplasty; Modular; Monoblock; Osteolysis; Prosthetic design; Survivorship; Tibial component

Indexed keywords

TANTALUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; INCIDENCE; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OSTEOLYSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TANTALUM; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77954656255     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.029     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. NIH Consensus Statement on Total Knee Replacement December 8-10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg 2004, 86-A:1328.
2. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg 2007, 89-A:780.
3. Gupta K.S., Chu A., Ranawat A.S., et al. Review article: osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:787.
4. Naudioe D.D.R., Ammeen D.J., Engh G.A., et al. Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007, 14:53.
5. Rand J.A., Trousdale R.T., Ilstrup D.M., et al. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 2003, 85-A:259.
6. Collier M.B., Engh C.A., McAuley J.P., et al. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert. J Bone Joint Surg 2005, 87-A:2702.
7. Fehring T.K., Murphy J.A., Hayes T.D., et al. Factors influencing wear and osteolysis in press-fit condylar modular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:40.
8. Roberts V.I., Esler C.A.N., Harper W.M. A 15-year follow-up study of 4606 primary total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 2007, 89-B:1452.
9. Conditt M.A., Thompson M.T., Usrey M.M., et al. Backside wear of polyethylene tibial inserts: mechanism and magnitude of material loss. J Bone Joint Surg 2005, 87:326.
10. Pagnano M.W., Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N. Tibial osteolysis associated with the modular tibial tray of a cemented posterior stabilized total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 2001, 83:1545.
11. Peters P.C., Engh G.A., Dwyer K.A., et al. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg 1992, 74:864.
12. Ezzet K.A., Garcia R., Barrack R.L. Effect of component fixation method on osteolysis in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, 321:86.
13. O'Rourke M.R., Callaghan J.J., Goetz D.D., et al. J Bone Joint Surg 2002, 84:1362.
14. Weber A.B., Worland R.L., Keenan J., et al. A study of polyethylene and modularity issues in >1,000 posterior cruciate-retaining knees at 5 to 11 years. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:987.
15. Ritter M.A., Berend M.E., Meding J.B., et al. Long-term follow-up of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 388:51.
16. Lonner J.H., Klotz M., Levitz C., et al. Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:107.
17. Petersen M.M., Nielsen P.T., Lebech A., et al. Preoperative bone mineral density of the proximal tibia and migration of the tibial component after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14:77.
18. Lonner J.H., Pearlman C., Kummer F.J., et al. The effect of keel design on tibial component stability in total knee arthroplasty 1997.
19. Engh G.A., Lounici S., Rao A.R., et al. In-vivo deterioration of tibial baseplate locking mechanisms in contemporary modular total knee components. J Bone Joint Surg 2001, 83-A:1660.
20. Muller S.D., Deehan D.J., Holland J.P., et al. Should we reconsider all-polyethylene tibial implants in total knee replacement?. J Bone Joint Surg 2006, 88-B:1596.
21. Adalberth G., Nilsson K.G., Byström S., et al. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed and stemmed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized RSA study. J Bone Joint Surg 2001, 83-B:825.
22. Ritter M.A. Twenty-year follow-up of the AGC total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:328.
23. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13.
24. Ewald F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:9.
25. Poggie R.A., Cohen R.C., Averill R.G. Characterization of a porous metal, direct compression molded UHMWPE junction 1998.
26. Florio C.S., Poggie R.A., Sidebotham C., et al. Stability characteristics of a cementless monoblock porous tantalum tibial implant without ancillary fixation 2004.
27. Bobyn J.D., Stackpool G.J., Hacking S.A., et al. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg 1999, 81-B:907.
28. Bobyn J.D., Toh K.K., Hacking S.A., et al. Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14:347.
29. Walker P.S., Greene D., Reilly D., et al. Fixation of tibial components of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1981, 63:258.
30. Bartel D.L., Burstein A.H., Santavicca E.A., et al. Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement: conventional and revision designs. J Bone Joint Surg 1982, 64-A:1026.
31. Hvid I., Hansen S.L. Trabecular bone strength patterns at the proximal tibial epiphysis. J Orhop Res 1985, 3:464.
32. Litsky A.S. Elimination of cup-liner micromotion in acetabular components 1999.
33. Dalury D.F., Pomeroy D.L., Gonzales R.A., et al. Midterm results of all-polyethylene tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:620.
34. Dalury D.F., Gonzales R.A., Adams M.J., et al. Midterm results with the PFC Sigma total knee arthroplasty system. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:175.
35. Najibi S., Iorio R., Surdam J.W., et al. All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18:S1-S9.
36. Ryd L., Albrektsson B.E.J., Carlsson L., et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1995, 77-B:377.
37. Minoda Y., Kobayashi A., Iwaki H., et al. Comparison of peri-prosthetic bone mineral density between trabecular metal and cemented tibial component 2008.
38. Minoda Y., Kobayashi A., Iwaki H., et al. Analysis of the metal-bone interface of a trabecular metal tibial component using fluoroscopic guided radiography 2008.
39. Henricson A., Linder L., Nilsson K.G. Trabecular metal tibial component in total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years. Bone Jt Surg [Br] 2008, [in press].
40. Dunbar M., Hennigar A., Wilson D., et al. RCT of a porous metal tibial monoblock TKA component using RSA: 2-year results 2008.
41. Babis G.C., Trousdale R.T., Morrey B.F. The effectiveness of isolated tibial insert exchange in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2002, 84-A:64.
42. Bert J.M., Reuben J., Kelly F., et al. The incidence of modular tibial polyethylene insert exchange in total knee arthroplasty when polyethylene failure occurs. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13:609.
43. Attar F.G., Khaw F.M., Kirk L.M.G., et al. Survivorship analysis at 15 years of cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:344.
44. Lachiewicz P.F., Soileau E.S. The rates of osteolysis and loosening associated with a modular posterior stabilized knee replacement. Results at five to fourteen years. J Bone Joint Surg 2004, 86-A:525.
45. Arora J., Ogden A.C. Osteolysis in a surface-cemented, primary, modular Freeman-Samuelson total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 2003, 85-B:489.
46. Kim Y.H., Oh J.H., Oh S.H. Osteolysis around cementless porous-coated anatomic knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1995, 77:236.