Efficient device-independent quantum key distribution

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6110 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 216-234

  Hänggi, Esther ^a   Renner, Renato ^a   Wolf, Stefan ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION FLOWS; NONLOCAL; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION; QUANTUM PHYSICS;

NETWORK PROTOCOLS; NETWORK SECURITY; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY;

QUANTUM EFFICIENCY;

EID: 77954653828     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Hänggi, E., Renner, R., Wolf, S.: Quantum cryptography based solely on Bell's theorem (2009), arxiv:quant-ph/0911.4171
2. Diffie, W., Hellman, M.E.: New directions in cryptography. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory 22(6), 644-654 (1976)
3. Rivest, R.L., Shamir, A., Adleman, L.: A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems. Commun. ACM 21(2), 120-126 (1978) (Pubitemid 8591219)
4. Maurer, U.: A provably-secure strongly-randomized cipher. In: Damgård, I.B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1990. LNCS, vol. 473, pp. 361-373. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
5. Dziembowski, S., Maurer, U.: The bare bounded-storage model: The tight bound on the storage requirement for key agreement. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory 54(6), 2790-2792 (2008)
6. Wyner, A.D.: The wire-tap channel. Bell System Technical J 54(8), 1355-1387 (1975)
7. Csiszár, I., Körner, J.: Broadcast channels with confidential messages. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory 24(3), 339-348 (1978)
8. Maurer, U.: Conditionally-perfect secrecy and a provably-secure randomized cipher. J. of Cryptology 5(1), 53-66 (1992)
9. Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G.: Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. In: Int. Conf. on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing (1984)
10. Ekert, A.K.: Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67(6), 661-663 (1991)
11. Gisin, N., Fasel, S., Kraus, B., Zbinden, H., Ribordy, G.: Trojan-horse attacks on quantum-key-distribution systems. Phys. Rev. A 73(2), 022320 (2006)
12. Fung, C.H.F., Qi, B., Tamaki, K., Lo, H.K.: Phase-remapping attack in practical quantum-key-distribution systems. Phys. Rev. A 75(3), 032314 (2007)
13. Qi, B., Fung, C.H.F., Lo, H.K., Ma, X.: Time-shift attack in practical quantum cryptosystems. Quantum Information and Computation 7, 073-082 (2007)
14. Zhao, Y., Fung, C.H.F., Qi, B., Chen, C., Lo, H.K.: Quantum hacking: Experimental demonstration of time-shift attack against practical quantum-key-distribution systems. Phys. Rev. A 78(4), 042333 (2008)
15. Makarov, V.: Controlling passively quenched single photon detectors by bright light. New J. of Physics 11(6), 065003 (2009)
16. Scarani, V., Kurtsiefer, C.: The black paper of quantum cryptography: real implementation problems (2009)
17. Mayers, D.C., Yao, A.: Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus. In: FOCS 1998, pp. 503-509 (1998)
18. Barrett, J., Hardy, L., Kent, A.: No signalling and quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010503 (2005)
19. Acín, A., Massar, S., Pironio, S.: Efficient quantum key distribution secure against no-signalling eavesdroppers. New J. of Phys. 8(8), 126 (2006) (Pubitemid 44180726)
20. Scarani, V., Gisin, N., Brunner, N., Masanes, L., Pino, S., Acín, A.: Secrecy extraction from no-signalling correlations. Phys. Rev. A 74(4), 042339 (2006)
21. Acín, A., Gisin, N., Masanes, L.: From Bell's theorem to secure quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 120405 (2006)
22. Acín, A., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Massar, S., Pironio, S., Scarani, V.: Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007)
23. McKague, M.: Device independent quantum key distribution secure against coherent attacks with memoryless measurement devices. New J. of Phys. 11(10), 103037 (2009)
24. Terhal, B.M.: Is entanglement monogamous? IBM J. of Research and Development 48(1), 71-78 (2004)
25. Bell, J.S.: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195-200 (1964)
26. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777-780 (1935)
27. Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Holt, R.A.: Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23(15), 880-884 (1969)
28. Popescu, S., Rohrlich, D.: Quantum nonlocality as an axiom. Found. Phys. 24(3), 379-385 (1994)
29. Cirel'son, B.S.: Quantum generalizations of Bell's inequality. Lett. in Math. Phys. 4(2), 93-100 (1980)
30. Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Robert, J.M.: Privacy amplification by public discussion. SIAM J. on Computing 17(2), 210-229 (1988)
31. Impagliazzo, R., Levin, L.A., Luby, M.: Pseudo-random generation from one-way functions. In: STOC 1989, pp. 12-24 (1989)
32. Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Maurer, U.: Generalized privacy amplification. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory 41(6), 1915-1923 (1995)
33. König, R., Maurer, U., Renner, R.: On the power of quantum memory. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory 51(7), 2391-2401 (2005)
34. Renner, R., Koenig, R.: Universally composable privacy amplification against quantum adversaries. In: Kilian, J. (ed.) TCC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3378, pp. 407-425. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
35. Hänggi, E., Renner, R., Wolf, S.: The impossibility of non-signaling privacy amplification (2008)
36. Masanes, L.: Universally composable privacy amplification from causality constraints. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(14), 140501 (2009)
37. Masanes, L., Renner, R., Winter, A., Barrett, J., Christandl, M.: Security of key distribution from causality constraints (2009)
38. Maurer, U.: Indistinguishability of random systems. In: Knudsen, L.R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2332, pp. 110-132. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
39. Pfitzmann, B., Waidner, M.: A model for asynchronous reactive systems and its application to secure message transmission. In: SP 2001, p. 184 (2001) (Pubitemid 32882636)
40. Backes, M., Pfitzmann, B., Waidner, M.: A composable cryptographic library with nested operations. In: CCS 2003, pp. 220-230 (2003) (Pubitemid 40673804)
41. Canetti, R.: Universally composable security: a new paradigm for cryptographic protocols. In: FOCS 2001, p. 136 (2001)
42. Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
43. Carter, J.L., Wegman, M.N.: Universal classes of hash functions (extended abstract). In: STOC 1977, pp. 106-112 (1977)
44. Brassard, G., Salvail, L.: Secret-key reconciliation by public discussion. In: Helleseth, T. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1993. LNCS, vol. 765, pp. 410-423. Springer, Heidelberg (1994) (Pubitemid 24767313)
45. König, R., Renner, R.: A de Finetti representation for finite symmetric quantum states. J. Math. Phys. 46(122108) (2005)