Upstream reciprocity in heterogeneous networks

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 265, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 297-305

  Iwagami, Akio ^a   Masuda, Naoki ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Altruism; Evolution of cooperation; Indirect reciprocity; Scale free networks

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; GAME THEORY; PRISONER DILEMMA; RECIPROCITY;

ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL NETWORK; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; GAME; MONTE CARLO METHOD; SOCIAL SUPPORT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALTRUISM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; GAME THEORY; HELPING BEHAVIOR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; SOCIAL SUPPORT; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION;

RATTUS;

EID: 77954623480     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Axelrod R. Evolution of Cooperation 1984, Basic Books, New York, NY.
2. Barabási A.-L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999, 286:509-512.
3. Bartlett M.Y., DeSteno D. Gratitude and prosocial behavior. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 17:319-325.
4. Boyd R., Richerson P.J. The evolution of indirect reciprocity. Soc. Netw. 1989, 11:213-236.
5. Brandt H., Sigmund K. The logic of reprobation: assessment and action rules for indirect reciprocation. J. Theor. Biol. 2004, 231:475-486.
6. Donato D., Laura L., Leonardi S., Millozzi S. Large scale properties of the webgraph. Eur. Phys. J. B 2004, 38:239-243.
7. Dufwenberg M., Gneezy U., Güth W., van Damme E. Direct vs indirect reciprocity: an experiment. Homo Oecono. 2001, 18:19-30.
8. Durán O., Mulet R. Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma in random graphs. Physica D 2005, 208:257-265.
9. Ebel H., Mielsch L.-I., Bornholdt S. Scale-free topology of e-mail networks. Phys. Rev. E 2002, 66:035103. (R).
10. Eubank S., Guclu H., Kumar V.S.A., Marathe M.V., Srinivasan A., Toroczkai Z., Wang N. Modeling disease outbreaks in realistic urban social networks. Nature 2004, 429:180-184.
11. Greiner B., Levati M.V. Indirect reciprocity in cyclical networks-an experimental study. J. Econ. Psychol. 2005, 26:711-731.
12. Kossinets G., Watts D.J. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science 2006, 311:88-90.
13. Leimar O., Hammerstein P. Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Proc. R. Soc. London B 2001, 268:745-753.
14. Lusseau D., Newman M.E.J. Identity of the role that animals play in their social networks. Proc. R. Soc. London B (Suppl.) 2004, 271:S477-S481.
15. Masuda N., Ohtsuki H. Evolutionary dynamics and fixation probabilities in directed networks. New J. Phys. 2009, 11:033012.
16. Milinski M., Semmann D., Krambeck H.-J. Reputation helps solve 'the tragedy of the commons'. Nature 2002, 415:424-426.
17. Newman M.E.J., Forrest S., Balthrop J. Email networks and the spread of computer viruses. Phys. Rev. E 2002, 66:035101. (R).
18. Newman M.E.J. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 2003, 45:167-256.
19. Newman M.E.J. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Soc. Netw. 2005, 27:39-54.
20. Noh J.D., Rieger H. Random walks on complex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92:118701.
21. Nowak M.A., May R.M. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature 1992, 359:826-829.
22. Nowak M.A., Sigmund K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 1998, 393:573-577.
23. Nowak M.A., Sigmund K. The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 1998, 194:561-574.
24. Nowak M.A., Sigmund K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 2005, 437:1291-1298.
25. Nowak M.A., Roch S. Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proc. R. Soc. B 2007, 19:605-609.
26. Ohtsuki H., Iwasa Y. How should we define goodness?-Reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 2004, 231:107-120.
27. Ohtsuki H., Hauert C., Lieberman E., Nowak M.A. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 2006, 441:502-505.
28. Ohtsuki H., Iwasa Y. The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 239:435-444.
29. Onnela J.-P., Saramäki J., Hyvönen J., Szabó G., Lazer D., Kaski K., Kertész J., Barabási A.-L. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:7332-7336.
30. Pfeiffer T., Rutte C., Killingback T., Taborsky M., Bonhoeffer S. Evolutionof cooperation by generalized reciprocity. Proc. R. Soc. B 2005, 272:1115-1120.
31. Rutte C., Taborsky M. Generalized reciprocity in rats. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e196.
32. Santos F.C., Pacheco J.M. Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95:098104.
33. Santos F.C., Pacheco J.M., Lenaerts T. Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:3490-3494.
34. Santos F.C., Pacheco J.M. A new route to the evolution of cooperation. J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:726-733.
35. Stanca L. Measuring indirect reciprocity: whose back do we scratch?. J. Econ. Psychol. 2009, 30:190-202.
36. Szabó G., To{double acute}ke C. Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on a square lattice. Phys. Rev. E 1998, 58:69-73.
37. Tomassini M., Pestelacci E., Luthi L. Social dilemmas and cooperation in complex networks. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 2007, 18:1173-1185.
38. Traulsen A., Nowak M.A., Pacheco J.M. Stochastic dynamics of invasion and fixation. Phys. Rev. E 2006, 74:011909.
39. Wedekind C., Milinski M. Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science 2000, 288:850-852.