A critical assessment of project management methods with respect to electronic government implementation challenges

Systemic Practice and Action Research

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 301-321

  Sarantis, Demetrios ^a   Smithson, Steve ^b   Charalabidis, Yannis ^a   Askounis, Dimitris ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

e Government information systems; Information systems; Information technology project management; Public administration systems; Systematic approach; Systemic approach; Transformational government

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954621099     PISSN: 1094429X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11213-009-9161-9     Document Type: Article

References (143)

1. Abramson MA, Littman ID (2002) Innovation. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc, Lanham.
2. Allison G (1996) Public and private management: are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In: Shafritz J, Hyde A (eds) Classics of public administration. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, pp 396-413.
3. Andersen ES, Dyrhaug QX, Jessen SA (2002) Evaluation of Chinese projects and comparison with Norwegian projects. Int J Proj Manag 20(8): 601-609.
4. Andersen EA, Grude KV, Hague T (2004) Goal directed project management. Kogan Page, London.
5. Avison D, Fitzgerald G (2008) Information systems development: methodologies, techniques and tools. McGraw-Hill, Berkshire.
6. Bacon N (1991) Information systems strategies in government-recent survey evidence. J Inf Technol 6(2): 94-107.
7. Bajjaly ST (1998) Strategic information systems planning in the public sector. Am Rev Public Adm 28(1): 75-85.
8. Bajjaly ST (1999) Managing emerging information systems in the public sector. Public Perform Manag Rev 23(1): 40-47.
9. Baldwin N (1987) Public versus private: not that different, not that consequential. Public Pers Manag 16: 181-193.
10. Baskerville R, Wood-Harper AT (1998) Diversity in information systems action research methods. Eur J Inf Syst 7: 90-107.
11. Bell S, Christina A (2006) Applying systemic project management approaches for the UK National Health Service. Syst Pract Action Res 19(1): 27-43.
12. Bellamy C (2000) The politics of public information systems. In: Garson GD (ed) Handbook of public information systems. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 85-98.
13. Bellamy C, Henderson S (1992) The UK social security benefits agency: a case study of the information polity. Inf Public Sect 2(1): 1-26.
14. Bennetts P, Wood-Harper T, Mills S (2000) An holistic approach to the management of information systems development-a view using a soft systems approach and multiple viewpoints. Syst Pract Action Res 13(2): 189-205.
15. Bhatnagar S (2002) e-Government: lessons from implementation in developing countries, vol 24. Regional Development Dialogue, UNCRD, Nagoya.
16. Borins S (2000) What border? Public management innovation in the United States and Canada. J Policy Anal Manag 19(1): 46-74.
17. Box R (1999) Running government like a business: implications for public administration theory and research. Am Rev Public Adm 29: 19-43.
18. Boyne G (1996) The intellectual crisis in British public administration: is public management the problem or the solution? Public Adm 74(4): 679-694.
19. Boyne G (2002) Public and private management: what's the difference? J Manag Stud 39(1): 97-122.
20. Bozeman B, Bretschneider S (1986) Public management information systems: theory and prescription. Public Adm Rev 46: 475-487.
21. Bozeman B, Kingsley G (1998) Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public Adm Rev 58: 109-118.
22. Bozeman B, Scott P (1996) Bureaucratic red tape and formalization: untangling conceptual knots. Am Rev Public Adm 26(1): 1-17.
23. Bozeman B, Reed P, Scott P (1992) Red tape and task delays in public and private organizations. Adm Soc 24(3): 290-322.
24. Bretschneider S (1990) Management information systems in public and private organizations: an empirical test. Public Adm Rev 50(5): 536-545.
25. Brindle M, Stearns P (2001) Facing up to management faddism: a new look at an old force. Quorum Books, Westport.
26. Brown MM (2001) The benefits and costs of information technology innovations: an empirical assessment of a local government agency. Public Perform Manag Rev 24(4): 351-366.
27. Brown MM (2003) Technology diffusion and the knowledge barrier: the dilemma of stakeholder participation. Public Perform Manag Rev 26(4): 345-359.
28. Brown MM, Brudney JL (2003) Learning organizations in the public sector? A study of police agencies employing information and technology to advance knowledge. Public Adm Rev 63(1): 30-43.
29. Buchanan B (1975) Red-tape and the service ethic: some unexpected differences between public and private managers. Adm Soc 6: 423-444.
30. Burbridge L (2002) Accountability and MIS. Public Perform Manag Rev 25(4): 421-423.
31. Caffrey L (1998) Information sharing between and within governments: a study group report. Commonwealth Secretariat, London.
32. Cao G, Clarke S, Lehaney B (2004) The need for a systemic approach to change management-a case study. Syst Pract Action Res 17(2): 103-126.
33. Cats-Baril W, Thompson R (1995) Managing information technology projects in the public sector. Public Adm Rev 55(6): 559-566.
34. Checkland PB (1989) Soft systems methodology. In: Rosenhead J (ed) Rational analysis for a problematic world. Wiley, Chichester.
35. Checkland P, Scholes J (1999) Soft systems methodology: a 30-year retrospective. Soft systems methodology in action, Wiley Chichester.
36. Chengalur-Smith I, Duchessi P (1999) The initiation and adoption of client-server technology in organizations. Inf Manag 35: 77-88.
37. Chowdhury HG, Habib MW, Kushchu I (2006) Success and failure factors for e-government projects implementation in developing countries: a study on the perception of government officials of Bangladesh. In: Kushchu I, Broucki C, Fitzpatrick G (eds) Proceedings of the second conference on mobile government. Mobile Government Consortium International, Brighton, pp 71-80.
38. Chub J, Moe T (1988) Politics, markets and the organization of schools. Am Politi Sci Rev 82: 1065-1087.
39. Cicmil S (2003) Knowledge, interaction, and project work: from instrumental rationality to practical wisdom. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, British Library.
40. Cicmil S, Marshall D (2005) Insights into collaboration at project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms. Build Res Inf 33(6): 523-535.
41. Clements RB (1999) IS manager's guide to implementing and managing internet technology. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
42. Cohen S, Eimicke W (2003) The future of e-government: a project of potential trends and issues. In: Sprague RH (ed) Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE Computer Society, pp 146. 2.
43. Collins T, Bicknell D (1997) Crash: learning from the world's worst computer disasters. Simon & Schuster, New York.
44. Committee on Government Reform House of Representatives (CGRHR) (2003) Federal e-government initiatives: are we headed in the right direction? hearing before the subcommittee on technology, information policy, intergovernmental relations, and the census of the committee on government reform, house of representatives, one hundred eighth congress, first session, 13 March 2003.
45. Cooke-Davies T (2004) De-engineering project management. In: Wikström K, Artto K (eds) Proceedings of the IRNOP VI conference. Turku, Finland.
46. Corner I, Hinton M (2002) Customer relationship management systems: implementation risks and relationship dynamics. Qual Mark Res 5(4): 239-251.
47. Danziger JN, William H, Dutton R, Kling JL, Kenneth LK (1982) Computers and Politics. Columbia University Press, New York.
48. Dawes S (2008) Introduction to digital government research in public policy and management. In: Chen H, Brandt L, Gregg V, Traunmüller R, Dawes S, Hovy E, Macintosh A, Larson CA (eds) Digital government, e-government research, case studies, and implementation. Springer, USA, pp 103-125.
49. Dawes S, Nelson MR (1995) Pool the risks, share the benefits: partnerships in IT innovation. In: Keyes J (ed) Technology trendlines. Technology success stories from today's visionaries. van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 125-136.
50. Dawes S, Pardo T (2002) Building collaborative digital government systems. In: Mciver W, Elmagarmid AK (eds) Advances in digital government. Technology, human factors, and policy. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 259-276.
51. Duncan A, Bertot JC, McClure C (2002) E-government: initiatives, developments, and issues. Gov Inf Q 19: 349-355.
52. Dutton W, Kenneth LK (1977) Technology and urban management: the power payoffs of computing. Adm Soc 9(3): 304-340.
53. Earl M (1990) Education: the foundation for effective IT strategies. IT and the New Manager Conference. Computer Weekly/Business Intelligence, London.
54. Eason K (1988) Information technology and organisational change. Taylor and Francis, London.
55. Edmiston KD (2003) State and local e-government: prospects and challenges. Am Rev Public Adm 33(1): 20-45.
56. Farnham D, Horton S (1996) Managing public and private organizations. In: Farnham D, Horton S (eds) Managing the new public services. Macmillan, London.
57. Flood R (2000) A brief review of Peter B. Checkland's contribution to systemic thinking. Syst Pract Action Res 13(6): 723-731.
58. Fottler MD (1981) Is management really generic? Acad Manage Rev 6: 1-12.
59. Garden A (1988) Behavioral and organizational factors involved in the turnover of high tech professionals. Comput Pers 11: 6-9.
60. Gauch R (1993) Differences between public and private management information systems. In: Tanniru MR (ed) Proceedings of the 1993 conference on computer personnel research. ACM, New York.
61. Gil-García JR, Pardo T (2005) E-government success factors: mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Gov Inf Q 22(2): 187-216.
62. Goldfinch S (2007) Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector. Public Adm Rev 67(5): 917-929.
63. Gupta M, Kumar P, Bhattacharya J (2004) Government online opportunities and challenges. Tata McGraw-Hill, India.
64. Harris ND (2000) Intergovernmental cooperation in the development and use of information systems. In: Garson GD (ed) Handbook of public information systems. Marcel Dekker, New York.
65. Heeks R (2003a) Most eGovernment-for-development projects fail: how can risks be reduced? iGovernment Working Paper Series, IDPM. University of Manchester, UK.
66. Heeks R (2003b) Causes of e-government success and failure: factor model. Institute for Development Policy and Management. University of Manchester, UK.
67. Heeks R (2006) Implementing and managing eGovernment: an international text. Sage, London.
68. Heintze T, Bretschneider S (2000) Information technology and restructuring in public organizations: does adoption of information technology affect organizational structures, communications, and decision making? J Public Adm Res Theory 10(4): 801-830.
69. Hirschheim R, Klein HK (1989) Four paradigms of information systems development. Commun ACM 32: 1199-1216.
70. Ho AT (2002) Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Adm Rev 62(4): 434-444.
71. Ho J, Pardo T (2004) Toward the success of e-government initiatives: mapping known success factors to the design of practical tools. In: Sprague RH (ed) Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE Computer Society.
72. Holden SH, Norris DF, Fletcher PD (2003) Electronic government at the local level: progress to date and future issues. Public Perform Manag Rev 26(4): 325-344.
73. Iacovou C (1999) The IPACS project: when IT hits the fan. J Inf Technol 14(2): 267-275.
74. Irani Z, Love P, Elliman T, Jones S, Themistocleous M (2005) Evaluating e-government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities. Inf Syst J 15: 61-82.
75. Jaafari A (2001) Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shift. Int J Proj Manag 19(2): 89-101.
76. Jaeger PT (2003) The endless wire: e-government as global phenomenon. Gov Inf Q 20: 323-331.
77. James G (1997) IT fiascoes and how to avoid them. Datamation 43(11): 84-88.
78. Jenkins GM (1969) The systems approach. J Syst Eng 1(1): 3-49.
79. Kazi MAF, Spurling LJ (2000) Realist evaluation for evidence-based practice. In: European evaluation society 4th annual conference, Lausanne.
80. Kenny GK, Butler RJ, Hickson DJ, Cray D, Mallory GR, Wilson DC (1987) Strategic decision making: influence patterns in public and private sector organizations. Hum Relat 40: 613-631.
81. Kim S, Kim D (2003) South Korean public officials' perceptions of values, failure, and consequences of failure in e-government leadership. Public Perform Manag Rev 26(4): 360-375.
82. Kling R, Lamb R (1999) IT and organizational change in digital economies: a sociotechnical approach. Comput Soc 29(3): 17-25.
83. Kotler P, Armstrong G (2008) Principles of marketing. Prentice Hall, Sydney.
84. Kramer KL, King JL (2003) Information technology and administrative reform: will the time after e-government be different? Paper presented at the Heinrich Reinermann Schrift fest, Post Graduate School of Administration, Speyer, Germany.
85. Krishnaiah V (2006) The art of project management for speeding up the e-governance implementation. In: Bhattacharya J (ed) Technology in government. GIFT Publishing Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, New Delhi.
86. Landsbergen DJ, Wolken JRG (1998) Eliminating legal and policy barriers to interoperable government systems. In: Ohio Supercomputer Center (ed) Electronic commerce, law, and information policy strategies. Columbus, Ohio.
87. Landsbergen DJ, Wolken JRG (2001) Realizing the promise: government information systems and the fourth generation of information technology. Public Adm Rev 61(2): 206-220.
88. Lee SM, Tan X, Trimi S (2005) Current practices of leading e-government countries. Commun ACM 48(10): 99-104.
89. Mahler J, Regan PM (2002) Learning to govern online: federal agency internet use. Am Rev Public Adm 32(3): 326-349.
90. Margetts H (1991a) The computerisation of social security: the way forward or a step backwards? Public Adm 69(3): 325-343.
91. Margetts H (1991b) Information technology in the public sector: new risks, new dangers. ESRC/LSE seminar series on hazard management 'IT developments and hazard analysis'. London School of Economics, London.
92. Margetts H, Willcocks L (1993) Information systems in public services: disaster faster? Public Money Manag 13(2): 49-56.
93. Markus L (1983) Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Commun ACM 26: 430-444.
94. Markus L (2004) Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change. J Inf Technol 19(1): 4-20.
95. Markus L, Bashein R (2006) Interorganizational technochange: how to make successful choices in electronic partner integration. Society for Information Management, Advanced practices council.
96. Markus L, Robey D (1988) Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Manag Sci 34(5): 583-598.
97. Metcalfe L (1993) Public management: from imitation to innovation. In: Kooiman J (ed) Modern governance. Sage, London.
98. Metcalfe L, Richards S (1990) Improving public management. Sage, London.
99. Midgley G (2000) Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice. Plenum, New York.
100. Moon MJ (2002) The evolution of e-government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality? Public Adm Rev 62(4): 424-433.
101. Morris P (2002) Science, objective knowledge and the theory of project management. Civil Eng 150(2): 82-90.
102. Morton S (1991) The corporation of the 1990's: information technology and organizational transformation. Oxford University Press, New York.
103. National Audit Office (1991) Office automation in government departments. House of Commons paper 314. HMSO, London.
104. National Governors Association (NGA). (1997) Barriers to intergovernmental enterprise. National Governors Association, Washington, DC.
105. Nedovic-Budic Z, Godschalk DR (1996) Human factors in adoption of geographic information systems: a local government case study. Public Adm Rev 56(6): 554-567.
106. Nutt P, Backoff R (1993) Organizational publicness and its implications for strategic management. J Public Adm Res Theory 3(2): 209-231.
107. Office of Government Commerce, UK (OGC) (2005) PRINCE2 manual, managing successful projects with PRINCE2. Stationery Office Books, London.
108. Office of Public Services Reform (2003) Improving programme and project delivery. UK Civil Service Report, Whitehall, London.
109. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2001) The hidden threat to e-government: avoiding large government IT failures. Public Management Policy Brief No. 8, OECD, Paris.
110. Orlikowski W (1992) The duality of technology. Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ Sci 3(3): 398-427.
111. Page D, Williams P, Boyd D (1993) Report of the inquiry into the London ambulance service. South West Thames Regional Health Authority, London.
112. Palmer SR, Felsing JM (2002) A practical guide to feature-driven development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
113. Perry J, Porter L (1982) Factors affecting the content for motivation in public organisations. Acad Manag Rev 7(1): 89-98.
114. Project Management Institute, PMI (2001) The PMI project management fact book. Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania.
115. Quade ES, Boucher WI (1968) Systems analysis and policy planning: applications in defence. Elsevier, New York.
116. Rahul DE (2005) E-government systems in developing countries: stakeholders and conflict. In: Wimmer M, Traunmuller R, Gronlund A, Andersen K (eds) Lecture notes in computer science, 3591. Springer, Copenhagen, pp 26-37.
117. Rainey HG (1983) Public agencies and private firms: incentives, structures, goals and individual roles. Adm Soc 15(2): 207-242.
118. Rainey H, Backoff R, Levine C (1976) Comparing public and private organizations. Public Adm Rev 36(2): 233-246.
119. Ranson S, Stewart J (1994) Management for the public domain. St Martin's Press, New York.
120. Reeder FS (1998) The art of project management, government executive. http://www. govexec. com/tech/articles/0498tech2. htm.
121. Rocheleau B (2003) Politics, accountability, and government information systems. In: Garson GD (ed) Public information technology: policy and management issues. Idea Group, Hershey.
122. Ross BH (1988) Public and private sectors: the underlying differences. Manag Rev 3(14): 28-33.
123. Roy J (2003) The relational dynamics of e-governance: a case study of the City of Ottawa. Public Perform Manag Rev 26(4): 391-403.
124. Satyanarayana J (2004) e-Government the science of the possible. Prentice Hall, New Delhi.
125. Sayre W (1953) Premises of public administration. Public Adm Rev 18(2): 102-103.
126. Schware R (2004) Seminar on e-governance: from successful pilot to sustainable implementation. The World Bank Group, Global Information and Communication Technologies Department.
127. Snellen I (1991) Central government informatization policies. Paper at the EGPA conference-informatization in public administration, The Hague, Netherlands.
128. Snellen I, Schokker J (1992) Legal application systems in public administration-some specific building requirements. Paper in the European group of public administration study group on informatization in public administration, Pisa, Italy.
129. Solomon E (1986) Private and public sector managers: an empirical investigation of job characteristics and organizational climate. J Appl Psychol 71(2): 247-259.
130. Sorrentino M, Virili F (2004) Socio-technical perspectives on e-government initiatives. In: Traunmuller R (ed) Lecture notes in computer science 2739. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 489-495.
131. Standish Group (2004) Third quarter report 2004. http://www. standishgroup. com/sample_research/PDFpages/q3-spotlight. pdf.
132. Taylor J, Williams H (1990) Themes and issues in an information polity. J Inf Technol 5(3): 151-160.
133. Thiry M (2002) Combining value and project management into an effective programme management model. Int J Proj Manag 20(3): 221-227.
134. Thiry M (2004) For DAD: a programme management life-cycle process. Int J Proj Manag 22(3): 245-252.
135. Torraco RJ (2005) Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum Resour Dev Rev 4: 356-367.
136. U. S. Government, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and the Census of the Committee on Government Reform House of Representatives (2003) Federal e-government initiatives: are we headed in the right direction? U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
137. Wideman R (2002) Comparing PRINCE2 with PMBoK. AEW Services, Vancouver.
138. Willcocks L (1994) Managing information systems in UK public administration: issues and prospects. Public Adm 72(2): 13-32.
139. Winch G (2007) Rethinking project management: project organisations as information processing systems. In: Slevin DP, Cleland DI, Pinto JK (eds) Innovations: project management research, Project Management Institute.
140. Winter M, Smith C, Morris P, Cicmil S (2006) Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK government-funded research network. Int J Proj Manag 24(8): 638-649.
141. Yeo KT (1993) Systems thinking and project management-time to reunite. Int J Proj Manag 11(2): 111-117.
142. Yeo KT (1995) Planning and learning in major infrastructure development: systems perspectives. Int J Proj Manag 13(5): 287-293.
143. Yeo KT, Tiong RLK (2000) Positive management of differences for risk reduction in BOT projects. Int J Proj Manag 18(4): 257-265.