Conducting research in the aftermath of disasters: Ethical considerations

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 65-75

  O'Mathúna, Dónal P ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Coercion; Compensation; Developing countries; Disaster research; Ethics; Informed consent; Urgency; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; DISASTER RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; INFORMED CONSENT; NATURAL DISASTER; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW;

COERCION; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DISASTERS; ETHICS, RESEARCH; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS;

EID: 77954596087     PISSN: 17565383     EISSN: 17565391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2010.01076.x     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Kilpatrick DG. The ethics of disaster research: a special section. Journal of Traumatic Stress 2004; 17: 361-362
2. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. 2008. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html (accessed 30 December 2009).
3. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. 2002. http://www.cioms.ch/frame-guidelines-nov-2002.htm (accessed 30 December 2009).
4. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. 2002. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx (accessed 30 December 2009).
5. International Sociological Association. Code of ethics. 2001. http://www.isa-sociology.org/about/isa-code-of-ethics.htm (accessed 30 December 2009).
6. Sumathipala A. Research ethics must still apply in disaster zones. Science and Development Network. 2008. http://www.scidev.net/en/agriculture-and- environment/naturaldisasters/ opinions/research-ethics-must-still-apply-in- disasterzones. html (accessed 30 December 2009).
7. Siriwardhana C. Disaster research ethics - a luxury or a necessity for developing countries? Asian Tribune. 2007. http://www.asiantribune.com/index. php?q=node/4524 (accessed 30 December 2009).
8. Collogan LK, Tuma F, Dolan-Sewell R, Borja S, Fleischman AR. Ethical issues pertaining to research in the aftermath of disaster. Journal of Traumatic Stress 2004; 17: 363-372
9. Newman E, Kaloupek DG. The risks and benefits of participating in trauma-focused research studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress 2004; 17: 383-394
10. Stallings RA. Methodological issues. In:Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes R, eds. Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer, 2007; 55-82.
11. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? Journal of the American Medical Association 2000; 283: 2701-2711
12. Perry RW. What is a disaster? In:Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes R, eds. Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer, 2007; 1-15.
13. Tierney KJ. The field turns fifty: social change and the practice of disaster fieldwork. In:Stallings RA, ed. Methods of Disaster Research. Philadelphia: Xlibris, 2002; 349-374
14. Working Group on Disaster Research&Ethics. Statement on ethical issues in disaster-related research - a developing world perspective. Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 2007; 17: 82-83. http://www.eubios.info/ EJAIB52007.pdf (accessed 30 December 2009).
15. Lohr JM, Devilly GJ, Lilienfeld SO, Olatunji BO. First do no harm, and then do some good: science and professional responsibility in the response to disaster and trauma. The Behavior Therapist 2006; 29: 131-135 http://www.abct.org/docs/PastIssue/29n6.pdf (accessed 30 December 2009).
16. Gist R, Devilly GJ. Post-trauma debriefing: the road too frequently travelled. Lancet 2002; 360: 741-742
17. Rose SC, Bisson J, Churchill R, Wessely S. Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002; Issue 2.
18. Van Emmerik AA, Kamphuis JH, Hulsbosch AM, Emmelkamp PM. Single session debriefing after psychological trauma: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2002; 360: 766-771
19. World Health Organization. Mental Health in Emergencies. 2003. http://www.who.int/hac/techguidance/pht/8656.pdf (accessed 30 December 2009).
20. Sumathipala A, Siribaddana S. Research and clinical ethics after the tsunami: Sri Lanka. Lancet 2005; 366: 1418-1420
21. Del Ben KS, McLeish AC, Elkin TD. Research and ethics following a natural disaster: from the public's point of view. The Behavior Therapist 2006; 29: 128-130 http://www.abct.org/docs/PastIssue/29n6.pdf (accessed 30 December 2009).
22. O'Mathúna DP. Nanoethics: Big Ethical Issues with Small Technology. London: Continuum, 2009.
23. Rennie S, Mupenda B. Living apart together: reflections on bioethics, global inequality and social justice. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2008; 3: 25.
24. Farmer P, Campos NG. Rethinking medical ethics: a view from below. Developing World Bioethics 2004; 4: 17-41.
25. Institute for Research&Development. IRD sparks international interest in disaster research ethics at the 8th ABC. 2007. http://www.irdsrilanka.org/ ird/News6.php (accessed 30 December 2009).
26. Macklin R. Bioethics, vulnerability, and protection. Bioethics 2003; 17: 472-486
27. Levine C. The concept of vulnerability in disaster research. Journal of Traumatic Stress 2004; 17: 395-402.
28. Rosenstein DL. Decision-making capacity and disaster research. Journal of Traumatic Stress 2004; 17: 373-381
29. Boscarino JA, Figley CR, Adams RF, et al. Adverse reactions associated with studying persons recently exposed to mass urban disaster. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 2004; 192: 515-524
30. Galea S, Nandi A, Stuber J, et al. Participant reactions to survey research in the general population after terrorist attacks. Journal of Traumatic Stress 2005; 18: 461-465
31. McLeish AC, Del Ben KS. Symptoms of depression and posttraumatic stress disorder in an outpatient population before and after Hurricane Katrina. Depression and Anxiety 2008; 25: 406-421
32. Ahern J, Galea S, Resnick H, Vlahov D. Television images and probable posttraumatic stress disorder after September 11: the role of background characteristics, event exposures and perievent panic. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 2004; 192: 217-226
33. Djulbegovic B. The paradox of equipoise: the principle that drives and limits therapeutic discoveries in clinical research. Cancer Control 2009; 16: 342-347
34. O'Mathúna DP. Human subject protections: ethical issues in overseas medical research. Research Practitioner 2002; 3: 42-50.
35. Pfizer. Trovan/Nigeria clinical study. 2009. http://www. pfizer.com/news/press-releases/pfizer-press-statements-archive.jsp (accessed 20 December 2009).
36. Shuaibu I. Nigeria: Trovan - Kano, Pfizer agree on $75 million compensation. allAfrica.com. 2009. http://allafrica.com/ stories/200905150004. html (accessed 20 December 2009).
37. Angell M. The ethics of clinical research in the Third World. New England Journal of Medicine 1997; 337: 847-849
38. Arnason G, van Niekert A. Undue fear of inducements in research in developing countries. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2009; 18: 122-129
39. Ballantyne A. Benefits to research subjects in international trials: do they reduce exploitation or increase undue inducement? Developing World Bioethics 2008; 8: 178-191
40. North C, Pfefferbaum B, Tucker P. Ethical and methodological issues in academic mental health research in populations affected by disasters: the Oklahoma City experience relevant to September 11, 2001. CNS Spectrums 2002; 7: 580-584
41. Israel M, Hay I. Research Ethics for Social Scientists: Between Ethical Conduct and Regulatory Compliance. London: Sage, 2006.
42. Becker HS. Whose side are we on? Social Problems 1967; 14: 239-247