Quality evaluation of health information system's architectures developed using the HIS-DF methodology

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 156, Issue , 2010, Pages 21-31

  López, Diego M ^a,b   Blobel, Bernd ^a   Gonzalez, Carolina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DEL CAUCA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Architecture; HIS DF; HL7; Information Systems; Quality Evaluation; RUP; Semantic Interoperability; Standards

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; BIOASSAY; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION THEORY; INTEROPERABILITY; QUALITY ASSURANCE; QUALITY CONTROL; SEMANTICS; STANDARDS;

EMPIRICAL EXPERIMENTS; HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HIS-DF; QUALITY EVALUATION; REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS; SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY; STANDARD INFORMATION; SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 77954592510     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-565-5-21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Lopez DM, Blobel BG. A development framework for semantically interoperable health information systems. Int J Med Inform 2009 Feb;78(2):83-103.
2. Lopez DM, Blobel B. Enhanced semantic interoperability by profiling health informatics standards. Methods Inf Med 2009;48(2):170-7.
3. European Commission, Semantic Interoperability for Better Health and Safer Healthcare. Deployment and Research Roadmap for Europe,SemanticHEALTH Report. European Commission. Information Society and Media. 2009
4. Lopez DM. Semantic Interoperability between Clinical and Public Health Information System for Improving Public Health Services. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007;256-67.
5. Lano K.. A compositional semantics of UML-RSDS. Software and System Modeling 2009;8(1):85-116.
6. Lopez DM, Blobel B. Architectural Approaches for HL7-Based Health Information Systems Implementation. Methods Inf Med 2009 (submitted).
7. HL7 Colombia. [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.hl7.org.co (Accessed 15 Sep 2009)
8. Anderson JG, Aydin CE. Evaluating the Organizational Impact of Health Care Information Systems. 2th ed. New York: Springer; 2005.
9. Mårtensson F. Software Architecture Quality Evaluation. PhD Thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology. 2006.
10. Wohlin C et al. Experimentation in Software Engineering. An Introduction. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press; 2000.
11. Lindland O, Sindre G, Sølvberg A. Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling. IEEE Software 1994;11(2),42-9.
12. Maes A, Poels G. Evaluating Quality of conceptual modelling scripts based on user perceptions. Data & Knowledge Engineering 2007;63(3):701-24.
13. Unhelkar B. Verification and Validation for Quality of UML 2.0 Models.New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
14. Bolloju N, Leung SK. Assisting Novice Analysts in Developing Quality Conceptual Models with UML. Communications of the ACM 2006;49(7):108-12.
15. Shanks G. Conceptual Data Modelling: An Empirical Study of Expert and Novice Data Modellers. Australian Journal of Information Systems 4(2):63-73.