Assessing whether mortality is additive using marked animals: A Bayesian state - Space modeling approach

Ecology

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1916-1923

  Servanty, Sabrina ^a   Choquet, Remi ^a   Baubet, Éric ^b   Brandt, Seroe ^b   Gaillard, Jean Michel ^c,f   Schaub, Michael ^d,e   Toïoo, Carole ^b   Lebreton, Jean Dominique ^a   Buoro, Mathieu ^a   Giménez, Olivier ^a  

^a CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^b OFFICE NATIONAL DE LA CHASSE ET DE LA FAUNE SAUVAGE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^e SWISS ORNITHOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Cause specific mortalities; Compensatory mortality; Depensatory mortality; Mark recapture; Mixture of information; Multistate models; Ring recoveries; Wild boar

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CAUSE OF DEATH; CORRELATION; ENDANGERED SPECIES; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; PIG; SURVIVAL; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEMOGRAPHY; LONGEVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; SWINE;

ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; DEMOGRAPHY; LONGEVITY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; SUS SCROFA;

ANIMALIA; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 77954592030     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/09-1931.1     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anderson, D. R., and K. P. Burnham. 1976. Population ecology of the Mallard. VI. The effect of exploitation on survival. United States Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 128: 1-66.
2. Awkerman, J. A., K. P. Huyvaert, J. Miangel, J. A. Shigueto, and D. J. Anderson. 2006. Incidental and intentional catch threatens Galápagos waved albatross. Biological Conservation 133: 483-489.
3. Boyce, M. S., A. R. E. Sinclair, and G. C. White. 1999. Seasonal, compensation of predation and harvesting. Oikos 87: 419-426.
4. Buckland, S. T., K. B. Newman, L. Thomas, and N. B. Koesters. 2004. State-space models for the dynamics of wild animal populations. Ecological Modelling 171: 157-175.
5. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 1984. Tests of compensatory vs. additive hypotheses of mortality in Mallards. Ecology 65: 105-112.
6. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, Second edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
7. Choquet, R. 2008. Automatic generation of multistate capturerecapture models. Canadian Journal of Statistics 36: 1-15.
8. Coliman, D. W., P. O'Donoghue, J. T. Jorgenson, J. T. Hogg, C. Strobeck, and M. Festa-Bianchet. 2003. Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature 426: 655-658.
9. de Valpine, P., and A. Hastings. 2002. Fitting population models incorporating process noise and observation error. Ecological Monographs 72: 57-76.
10. Errington, P. L. 1946. Predation and vertebrate populations. Quarterly Review of Biology 21: 144-177.
11. Festa-Bianchet, M. 2003. Exploitative wildlife management as a selective pressure for the life-history evolution of large mammals. Pages 191-207 in M. Festa-Bianchet and M. Apollonio, editors. Animal behavior and wildlife conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
12. Focardi, S., J.-M. Gaillard, F. Ronchi, and. S. Rossi, 2008. Wild boar survival in a variable environment: unexpected life history variations in an unusual ungulate. Journal of Mammalogy 89: 1113-1123.
13. Gascoigne, J., and R. N. Lipcius. 2004. Allee effects in marine systems. Miarine Ecology Progress Series 269: 49-59.
14. Gelman, A. 1996. Inference and monitoring convergence. Pages 131-143 in W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D. J. Spiegelhalter, editors. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
15. Gimenez, O. 2008. Discussion: towards a Bayesian analysis template? Canadian Journal of Statistics 36: 21-28.
16. Gimenez, O., B. J. T. Morgan, and S. P. Brooks. 2009. Weak identifiability in models for mark-recapture-recovery data. Pages 1055-1069 in D. L. Thomson, E. G. Cooch, and M. J. Conroy, editors. Modeling demographic processes in marked populations. Springer series: environmental and ecological statistics. Volume 3. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
17. Gimenez, O., V. Rossi, R. Choquet, C. Dehais, B. Doris, H. Varella, J.-P. Vila, and R. Pradel. 2007. State-space modelling of data on marked individuals. Ecological Modelling 206: 431-438.
18. Gimenez, O., A. Viallefont, E. A. Catchpole, R. Choquet, and B. J. T. Morgan. 2004. Methods for investigating parameter redundancy. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 27: 561-572.
19. Gould, W. R., and J. D. Nichols. 1998. Estimation of temporal variability of survival in animal, populations. Ecology 79: 2531-2538.
20. Guibert, B. 2008. Bilan national de l'indemnisation des dégâts agricoles de sangliers. Pages 73-78 in F. Klein, B. Guibert, and E. Baubet, editors. Modalités de gestion du sanglier, Actes du colloque tenu à Reims (Marne) les 1 et 2 mars 2007. Fédé ration Nationale des Chasseurs, Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune, Sauvage, Paris, France.
21. Henny, C. J. 1967. Estimating band-reporting rates from banding and crippling loss data. Journal, of Wildlife Management 31: 533-538.
22. Jezierski, W. 1977. Longevity and mortality rate in population of wild boar. Acta Theriologica 22: 337-348.
23. Keuling, O., K. Lauterbach, N. Stier, and M. Roth. 2009. Hunter feedback, of individually marked wild boar Sus scrofa L:. dispersal and efficiency of hunting in northeastern Germany. European Journal of Wildlife Research, [doi: 10. 1007/s10344-009-0296-x]
24. Kimball, A. W. 1969. Models for the estimation of competing risks from grouped data. Biometrics 25: 329-337.
25. Lebreton, J.-D., K. P. Burnham, J. Clobert, and D. R. Anderson. 1992. Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach, with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62: 67-118.
26. Lebreton, J.-D., J. D. Nichols, R. J. Barker, R. Pradel, and J. A. Spendelow. 2009. Modeling individual animal histories with multistate capture-recapture models. Pages 87-173 in H. Caswell, editor. Advances in ecological research, 41. Academic Press, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.
27. Liermann, M., and R. Hilborn. 2001. Depensation: evidence, models and implications. Fish and Fisheries 2: 33-58.
28. Link, W. A., and R. J. Barker. 2005. Modeling association among demographic parameters in analysis of open population capture-recapture data. Biometrics 61: 46-54.
29. Lipscomb, J., G. Parmigiani, and V. Hasselblad. 1998. Combining expert judgment by hierarchical modelling: an application to physician staffing. Management Science 44: 149-161.
30. McCarthy, M. A. 2007. Bayesian methods for ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
31. Meffe, G. K., C. R. Carroll, and Contributors. 1997. Principles of conservation biology. Second edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
32. Metcalf, C. J. E., and S. Pavard. 2007. Why evolutionary biologists should be demographers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22: 205-212.
33. Nichols, J. D., F. A. Johnson, and B. K. Williams. 1995. Managing North American waterfowl in the face of uncertainty. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 177-199.
34. Otis, D., and G. C. White. 2004. Evaluation of ultrastructure and random effects band recovery models for estimating relationships between survival and harvest rates in exploited populations. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 27: 157-173.
35. Pöysä, H. 2004. Ecological basis of sustainable harvesting: is the prevailing paradigm of compensatory mortality still, valid? Oikos 104: 612-615.
36. Royle, J. A. 2008. Modeling individual effects in the CormackJolly-Seber model: a state-space formulation. Biometrics 64: 364-370.
37. Schaub, M. 2009. Evaluation of bias, precision and accuracy of mortality cause proportion estimators from ring recovery data. Pages 1081-1097 in D. L. Thomson, E. G. Cooch, and M. J. Conroy, editors. Modeling demographic processes in marked populations. Springer series: environmental and ecological statistics. Volume 3. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
38. Schaub, M., and J.-D. Lebreton. 2004. Testing the additive versus the compensatory hypothesis of mortality from ring recovery data using a random effects model. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 27: 73-85.
39. Schaub, M., and R, Pradel. 2004. Assessing the relative importance of different sources of mortality from, recoveries of marked animals. Ecology 85: 930-938.
40. Schley, L., and T. J. Roper. 2003. Diet of wild boar Sus seroja in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal Review 33: 43-56.
41. Skalski, J. R., K. E. Ryding, and J. J. Millspaugh. 2005. Wildlife demography: analysis of sex, age, and count data. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.
42. Spiegelhalter, D. J., A. Thomas, N. G. Best, and D. Lunn. 2003. WinBUGS user manual. Version 1.4. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK.
43. Stockwell, C. A., A. P. Hendry, and M. T. Kinnison. 2003. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 94-101.
44. Sturtz, S., U. Ligges, and A. Gelman. 2005. R2WinBUGS: a package for running WinBUGS from R. Journal of Statistical Software 12: 1-16.
45. Toïgo, C., S. Servanty, J.-M. Gaillard, S. Brandt, and E. Baubet. 2008. Survival patterns in an intensively hunted wild boar population: disentangling natural from hunting mortality. Journal, of Wildlife Management 72: 1532-1539.
46. Truvé, J., and J. Lemel. 2003. Timing and distance of natal dispersal for wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Sweden. Wildlife Biology 9(Supplement l):51-57.
47. Williams, B. K. 1996. Adaptive optimization and the harvest of biological populations. Mathematical Biosciences 136: 1-20.
48. Winkler, R. L. 1981. Combining probability distributions from dependent information sources. Management Science 27: 479-488.