Modulating video credibility via visualization of quality evaluations

Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility, WICOW '10

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 75-82

  Diakopoulos, Nicholas ^a   Essa, Irfan ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

credibility; mechanical turk; video annotation; visualization

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY LEVELS; CREDIBILITY; IN-LINE; QUALITY EVALUATION; VIDEO ANNOTATIONS; VISUAL CUES;

VISUALIZATION;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 77954576303     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1772938.1772953     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Adler, B.T. and Alfaro, L.d., A Content-Driven Reputation System for the Wikipedia. in Proceedings of the 16th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), (2007).
2. Adler, B.T., Chatterjee, K., Alfaro, L.d., Faella, M., Pye, I. and Raman, V., Assigning Trust to Wikipedia Content. in In WikiSym 2008: International Symposium on Wikis, (2008).
3. boyd, d., Lee, H.-Y., Ramage, D. and Donath, J., Developing Legible Visualizations for Online Social Spaces. in HICSS, (2002).
4. Diakopoulos, N. and Essa, I., An Annotation Model for Making Sense of Information Quality in Online Video. in International Conference on the Pragmatic Web, (Uppsala, Sweden, 2008).
5. Diakopoulos, N., Goldenberg, S. and Essa, I., Videolyzer: Quality Analysis of Online Informational Video for Bloggers and Journalists. in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (Boston, MA, 2009).
6. Diakopoulos, N. and Shamma, A., Characterizing Debate Performance via Aggregated Twitter Sentiment. in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (Atlanta, GA, 2010).
7. Few, S. Information Dashboard Design: The Effective Visual Communication of Data. O'Reilly Media, 2006.
8. Fogg, B.J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan, 2003.
9. Fogg, B.J., Prominence-interpretation theory: explaining how people assess credibility online. in CHI '03: CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, (2003), ACM, 722-723.
10. Fogg, B.J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Fang, N., Paul, J., Rangnekar, A., Shon, J., Swani, P. and Treinen, M., What makes Web sites credible?: a report on a large quantitative study. in CHI '01: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, (2001), ACM, 61-68.
11. Josephson, S. and Holmes, M.E., Clutter of Content? How on-screen enhancements affect how TV viewers scan and what they learn. in Proc. Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Application, (2006), 155-162.
12. Kittur, A., Chi, E.H. and Suh, B., Crowdsourcing User Studies With Mechanical Turk in Proceedings of CHI, (2008), 453-456.
13. Kittur, A., Suh, B. and Chi, E.H. Can You Ever Trust a Wiki? Impacting Perceived Trustworthiness in Wikipedia CSCW, San Diego, CA, 2008, 477-480.
14. Lampe, C. and Garrett, R.K., It's all News to Me: The Effect of Insturments on Ratings Provision. in Proceedings of HICSS, (2007).
15. Lerman, K. Social Information Processing in News Aggregation. IEEE Internet Computing. 16-28.
16. Lord, C.G., Ross, L. and Lepper, M.R. Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (11). 2098-2109.
17. Manjoo, F. True Enough: Learning to Live in a Post-Fact Society. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
18. McCroskey, J. The effects of evidence in persuasive communication. The Journal of Western Speech Communications, 31. 189-199.
19. Miller, K. Communication Theories: Perspectives, Processes, and Contexts. McGraw-Hill, 2004.
20. Murakami, K., Nichols, E., Matsuyoshi, S., Sumida, A., Masuda, S., Unui, K. and Matsumoto, Y., Statement Map: Assisting Information Credibility Analysis by Visualizing Arguments. in Workshop on Information Credibility on the Web, (2009).
21. Nakamura, S., Shimizu, M. and Tanaka, K., Can Social Annotation Support Users in Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Video Clips? in Workshop on Information Credibility on the Web (WICOW), (2008), 59-62.
22. Pentland, A.S. Honest Signals: How They Shape our World. MIT Press, 2008.
23. Perry, D.K. Theory and Reserach in Mass Communication: Contexts and Consequences (2nd Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.
24. Pirolli, P., Wollny, E. and Suh, B., So You Know You're Getting the Best Possible Information: A Tool that Increases Wikipedia Credibility. in Proc. CHI, (2009), 1505-1508.
25. Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M.S., Zaldivar, A. and Tomlinson, B., Who are the Crowdworkers? Shifting Demographics in Mechanical Turk. in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) alt.chi, (2010).
26. Shamma, A., Kennedy, L. and Churchill, E., Tweet the Debates. in ACM Multimedia Workshop on Social Media (WSM), (2009).
27. Sheng, V.S., Provost, F. and Ipeirotis, P.G., Get Another Label? Improving Data Quality and Data Mining Using Multiple, Noisy Labelers. in KDD, (2008).
28. Smith, M.A. and Fiore, A.T., Visualization Components for Persistent Conversations. in Proc CHI, (2001), 136-143.
29. Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D. and Ng, A.Y. Cheap and Fast - But is it Good? Evaluating Non-Expert Annotations for Natural Language Tasks Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2008.
30. Stvilia, B., Twidale, M., Smith, L. and Gasser, L. Information Quality Work Organization in Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (6). 983-1001.
31. Suh, B., Chi, E.H., Kittur, A. and Pendleton, B.A., Lifting the Veil: Improving Accountability and Social Transparency in Wikipedia with WikiDashboard. in Proc. CHI, (2008), 1037-1040.
32. Wyer, R.S., Jr., and Albarracín, D. Belief formation, organization, and change: Cognitive and motivational influences. in D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson and Zanna, M.P. eds. The handbook of attitudes, Erlbaum, 2005.