Is understory plant species diversity driven by resource quantity or resource heterogeneity?

Ecology

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1931-1938

  Bartels, Samuel F ^a   Chen, Han Y H ^a  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biome; Intermediate disturbance; Neutral theory; Old growth forest; Plant diversity; Resource heterogeneity; Resource quantity; Understory

Indexed keywords

BIOME; DATABASE; FLORISTICS; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; HETEROGENEITY; INTERMEDIATE DISTURBANCE HYPOTHESIS; LINEARITY; OLD-GROWTH FOREST; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; UNDERSTORY;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; CLIMATE; PLANT; TREE;

BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANTS; TREES;

EID: 77954569415     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/09-1376.1     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alaback, P. B. 1982. Dynamics of understory biomass in sitka spruce western hemlock forests of southeast Alaska. Ecology 63:1932-1948.
2. Barbier, S., F. Gosselin, and P. Balandier. 2008. Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved: a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 254:1-15.
3. Bartemucci, P., C. Messier, and C. D. Canham. 2006. Overstory influences on light attenuation patterns and understory plant community diversity and composition in southern boreal, forests of Quebec. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 2065-2079.
4. Beatty, S. W. 1.984. Influence of microtopography and canopy species on spatial patterns of forest understory plants. Ecology 65:1406-1419.
5. Beatty, S. W., and E. L. Stone. 1986. The variety of soil microsites created by tree fells. Canadian Journal, of Forest Research 16:539-548.
6. Bell, G. 2001, Ecology: neutral, macroecology. Science 293: 2413-2418.
7. Bradshaw, G. A., F. J. Swanson, and M. R. Fiorella. 1996. Implications of patch dynamics for forested ecosystems in the Pacific Northwest. Pages 283-305 in R. G. Lawford, P. B. Alaback, and E. Fuentes, editors. High-latitude rainforests and associated ecosystems of the west coast of the Americas: climate, hydrology, ecology, and conservation. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
8. Brandani, A., G. S. Hartshorn, and G. H. Orians. 1988. Internal heterogeneity of gaps and species richness in Costa Rican tropical forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 4:99-119.
9. Brassard, B. W., and H. Y. H. Chen. 2006. Stand, structural dynamics of North American boreal forests. Critical. Reviews in Plant Sciences 25:115-137.
10. Brassard, B. W., and H. Y. H. Chen. 2008. Effects of forest type and disturbance on diversity of coarse woody debris in boreal forest. Ecosystems 11:1078-1090.
11. Brown, M. J., and G. G. Parker. 1994. Canopy light transmittance in a chronosequence of mixed-species deciduous forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24:1694-1702.
12. Canham, C. D., J. S. Denslow, W. J. Piatt, J. R. Runkle, T. A. Spies, and P. S. White. 1990. Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20:620-631.
13. Chase, J. M., and M. A. Leibold. 2003. Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. University of Chigaco Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
14. Chazdon, R. L. 1996. Spatial, heterogeneity in tropical forest structure: canopy palms as landscape mosaics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:8-9.
15. Chen, H. Y. H., S. Légaré, and Y. Bergeron. 2004. Variation of the understory composition and diversity along a gradient of productivity in Populus tremuloides stands of northern British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 82:1314-1323.
16. Chen, H. Y. H., and. R. V. Popadiouk. 2002. Dynamics of North American boreal mixedwoods. Environmental Reviews 10:137-166.
17. Chipman, S. J., and E. A. Johnson. 2002. Understory vascular plant species diversity in the mixed wood boreal forest of western Canada. Ecological Applications 12:588-601.
18. Clinton, B. D. 2003. Light, temperature and soil moisture responses to elevation, evergreen understory, and small canopy gaps in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management 186:243-255.
19. Cornwell, W. K., and P. J. Grubb. 2003. Regional and local patterns in plant species richness with respect to resource availability. Oikos 100:417-428.
20. Crow, T. R., D. S. Buckley, E. A. Nauertz, and. J. C. Zasada. 2002. Effects of management on the composition and structure of northern hardwood forests in Upper Michigan. Forest Science 48:129-145.
21. D'Amato, A. W., D. A. Orwig, and D. R. Foster. 2009. Understory vegetation in old-growth and second-growth Tsuga canadensis forests in western Massachusetts. Forest Ecology and Management 257:1.043-1052.
22. Decocq, G., M. Aubert, F. Dupont, D. Alard, R. Sanguez, A. Wattez-Franger, B. De Foucault, A. Delelelis-Dusollier, and J. Bardat. 2004. Plant diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest: understory response to two silvicultural systems. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:1065-1079.
23. Denslow, J. S. 1987. Tropical rainforest gaps and tree species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 431-452.
24. Denslow, J. S., A. M. Ellison, and R. E. Sanford, 1998. Treefell gap size effects on above- and below-ground processes in a tropical wet forest. Journal of Ecology 86:597-609.
25. Franklin, J. F., et al. 2002. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural. implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. Forest Ecology and Management 155:399-423.
26. Fredericksen, T. S., B. D. Ross, W. Hoffman, M. L. Morrison, J. Beyea, B. N. Johnson, M. B. Lester, and E. Ross. 1999. Short-term understory plant community responses to timberharvesting intensity on non-industrial private forestlands in Pennsylvania. Forest Ecology and Management 116:129-139.
27. Gilliam, F. S., and N. L. Turrill. 1993. Herbaceous layer cover and biomass in a young versus a mature stand of a Central Appalachian hardwood forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 120:445-450.
28. Gross, K. L., M. R. Willig, L. Gough, R. Inouye, and. S. B. Cox. 2000. Patterns of species density and productivity at different spatial scales in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 89:417-427.
29. Guariguata, M. R., R. L. Chazdon, J. S. Denslow, J. M. Dupuy, and L. Anderson. 1997. Structure and floristics of secondary and old-growth forest stands in lowland Costa Rica. Plant Ecology 132:1.07-120.
30. Gundale, M. J., K. L. Metlen, C. E. Fieldler, and. T. H. DeLuca. 2006. Nitrogen spatial heterogeneity influences diversity following restoration in a ponderosa pine forest, Montana. Ecological Applications 16:479-489.
31. Halpern, C. B., and T. A. Spies. 1.995. Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications 5:913-934.
32. Hart, S. A., and. H. Y. H. Chen. 2006. Understory vegetation dynamics of North American boreal forests. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 25:381-397.
33. Hart, S. A., and. H. Y. H. Chen. 2008. Fire, logging, and overstory affect understory abundance, diversity, and composition in boreal forest. Ecological Monographs 78:123-140.
34. Hély, C., Y. Bergeron, and M. D. Flannigan. 2000. Coarse woody debris in the southeastern Canadian boreal forest: composition and load variations in relation to stand replacement. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30:674-687.
35. Howard, L. F., and T. D. Lee. 2003. Temporal patterns of vascular plant diversity in southeastern New Hampshire forests. Forest Ecology and Management 185:5-20.
36. Hubbell, S. P. 2001. A unified theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
37. Huston, M. 1979. A general, hypothesis of species diversity. American Naturalist 113:81-100.
38. Huston, M. A. 1994. Biological diversity: The coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
39. Hutchinson, T. F., R. E. J. Boerner, L. R. Iverson, S. Sutherland, and E. K. Sutherland, 1999. Landscape patterns of understory composition and richness across a moisture and nitrogen mineralization gradient in Ohio (U.S.A.) Quer cus forests. Plant Ecology 144:177-189.
40. Jonsson, B. G., and P.-A. Esseen. 1990. Treefell disturbance maintains high bryophyte diversity in boreal spruce forests. Journal of Ecology 78:924-936.
41. Klinka, K., H. Y. H. Chen, Q. Wang, and L. de Montigny. 1996. Forest canopies and their influence on the cover of understory vegetation in early-seral stands on West Vancouver Islands. Northwest Science 70:193-200.
42. Légaré, S., Y. Bergeron, A. Leduc, and D. Paré. 2001. Comparison of the understory composition in boreal forest types of southwest Quebec. Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 1019-1027.
43. Légaré, S., Y. Bergeron, and D. Paré. 2002. Influence of forest composition on understory cover in boreal mixedwood forests of western Quebec. Silva Fennica 36:353-366.
44. MacArthur, R. H. 1968. The theory of niche. Pages 159-176 in R. C. Lewontin, editor. Population biology and evolution. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York, USA.
45. Macdonald, S. E., and T. E. Fenniak. 2007. Understory plant communities of boreal, mixedwood forests in western Canada: natural patterns and response to variable retention harvesting. Forest Ecology and Management 242:34-48.
46. Magnani, F., et al, 2007. The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests. Nature 447:848-850.
47. Messier, C., S. Parent, and Y. Bergeron. 1998. Effects of overstory and understory vegetation on the understory light environment in mixed boreal forests. Journal of Vegetation Science 9:511-520.
48. Montgomery, R. A., and R. L. Chazdon. 2001. Forest structure, canopy architecture, and light transmittance in tropical wet forests. Ecology 82:2707-2718.
49. Nicotra, A. B., R. L. Chazdon, and S. V. B. Iriarte. 1999. Spatial heterogeneity of light and woody seedling regeneration in tropical wet forests. Ecology 80:1908-1926.
50. Nilsson, M. C., and D. A. Wardle. 2005. Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3:421-428.
51. Pare, D., and. K. Van Cleve. 1993. Soil nutrient availability and relationship with aboveground biomass production on postharvested upland white spruce sites in interior Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:1223-1232.
52. Prescott, C. E., L. M. Zabec, C. L. Staley, and R. Kabzems. 2000. Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of forest type, litter type and litter mixtures. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 1742-1750.
53. Rahbek, C. 2004. The role of spatial scales and the perception of large-scale species richness patterns. Ecology Letters 8: 224-239.
54. Ricklefs, R. E. 1977. Environmental heterogeneity and plant species diversity: a hypothesis. American Naturalist 111:376-381.
55. Roberts, M. R. 2004. Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests. Canadian Journal of Botany 82:1273-1283.
56. Roberts, M. R., and F. S. Gilliam. 2003. Response of the herbaceous layer to disturbance in eastern forests. Pages 302-320 in F. S. Gilliam and M. R. Roberts, editors. The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
57. Royo, A. A., and W. P. Carson. 2006. On the formation of dense understory layers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:1345-1362.
58. Schaetzl, R. J., S. F. Burns, D. L. Johnson, and T. W. Small. 1989. Tree uprooting: review of impact on forest ecology. Vegetatio 79:165-176.
59. Stevens, M. H. H., and W. P. Carson. 2002. Resource quantity, not resource heterogeneity, maintains plant diversity. Ecology Letters 5:420-426.
60. Stone, W. E., and M. L. Wolfe. 1996. Response of understory vegetation to variable tree mortality following a mountain pine beetle epidemic in lodgepole pine stands in northern Utah. Vegetatio 122:1-12.
61. Sturtevant, B. R., J. A. Bissonette, J. N. Long, and D. W. Roberts. 1997. Coarse woody debris as a function of age, stand structure, and disturbance in boreal Newfoundland. Ecological Applications 7:702-712.
62. Tárrega, R., L. Calvo, E. Marcos, and A. Taboada. 2006. Forest structure and understory diversity in Quercus pyrenaica communities with different human uses and disturbances. Forest Ecology and Management 227:50-58.
63. Vu, H. T. V., and R. A. Maller. 1996. The likelihood ratio test for Poisson versus binomial distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91:818-824.
64. Waide, R. B., M. R. Willig, C. F. Steiner, G. Mittelbach, L. Gough, S. I. Dodson, G. P. Juday, and R. Parmenter. 1999. The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annual. Review of Ecology and Systematics 30:257-300.
65. Whittaker, R. J., K. J. Willis, and R. Field. 2001. Scale and species richness: towards a general hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography 28:453-470.
66. Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Fourth, edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.