Comparative analysis of total body and dermatoscopic photographic monitoring of nevi in similar patient populations at risk for cutaneous melanoma

Dermatologic Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1087-1098

  Goodson, Agnessa Gadeliya ^a   Florell, Scott R ^a   Hyde, Mark ^b   Bowen, Glen M ^a,b   Grossman, Douglas ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPILUMINESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MELANOMA; NEVUS; PATIENT MONITORING; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN BIOPSY; TUMOR BIOPSY;

BIOPSY; COHORT STUDIES; DERMOSCOPY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MELANOMA; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEVUS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SKIN NEOPLASMS;

EID: 77954551145     PISSN: 10760512     EISSN: 15244725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01589.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Tucker MA, Fraser MC, Goldstein AM, et al. Risk of melanoma and other cancers in melanoma-prone families. J Invest Dermatol 1993 100 : 350S 5S.
2. Bataille V, Bishop JA, Sasieni P, et al. Risk of cutaneous melanoma in relation to the numbers, types and sites of naevi: a case-control study. Br J Cancer 1996 73 : 1605 1611.
3. Kelly JW, Yeatman JM, Regalia C, et al. A high incidence of melanoma found in patients with multiple dysplastic naevi by photographic surveillance. Med J Aust 1997 167 : 191 194.
4. Goodson AG, Grossman D. Strategies for early melanoma detection: approaches to the patient with nevi. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009 60 : 719 735.
5. Lucas CR, Sanders LL, Murray JC, et al. Early melanoma detection: nonuniform dermoscopic features and growth. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 48 : 663 671.
6. Altamura D, Avramidis M, Menzies SW. Assessment of the optimal interval for and sensitivity of short-term sequential digital dermoscopy monitoring for the diagnosis of melanoma. Arch Dermatol 2008 144 : 502 506.
7. Rigel DS, Friedman RJ, Kopf AW, Polsky D. ABCDE - an evolving concept in the early detection of melanoma. Arch Dermatol 2005 141 : 1032 1034.
8. Muhn CY, From L, Glied M. Detection of artificial changes in mole size by skin self-examination. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000 42 : 754 759.
9. Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital epiluminescence microscopy: patterns of modifications observed in early melanoma, atypical nevi, and common nevi. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000 43 : 467 476.
10. Robinson JK, Nickoloff BJ. Digital epiluminescence microscopy monitoring of high-risk patients. Arch Dermatol 2004 140 : 49 56.
11. Haenssle HA, Krueger U, Vente C, et al. Results from an observational trial: digital epiluminescence microscopy follow-up of atypical nevi increases the sensitivity and the chance of success of conventional dermoscopy in detecting melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 2006 126 : 980 985.
12. Feit NE, Dusza SW, Marghoob AA. Melanomas detected with the aid of total cutaneous photography. Br J Dermatol 2004 150 : 706 714.
13. Wang SQ, Kopf AW, Koenig P, et al. Detection of melanomas in patients followed up with total cutaneous examinations, total cutaneous photography, and dermoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004 50 : 15 20.
14. Fuller SR, Bowen GM, Tanner B, et al. Digital dermoscopic monitoring of atypical nevi in patients at risk for melanoma. Dermatol Surg 2007 33 : 1198 1206.
15. Halpern AC, Marghoob AA, Bialoglow TW, et al. Standardized positioning of patients (poses) for whole body cutaneous photography. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 49 : 593 598.
16. Grob JJ, Bonerandi JJ. The 'ugly duckling' sign: identification of the common characteristics of nevi in an individual as a basis for melanoma screening. Arch Dermatol 1998 134 : 103 104.
17. Banky JP, Kelly JW, English DR, et al. Incidence of new and changed nevi and melanomas detected using baseline images and dermoscopy in patients at high risk for melanoma. Arch Dermatol 2005 141 : 998 1006.
18. Piepkorn M, Barnhill RL. Common acquired and atypical (dysplastic) melanocytic nevi. In : Barnhill RL, Piepkorn M, Busam KJ, editors. Pathology of Melanocytic Nevi and Malignant Melanoma.
19. Barnhill RL. Malignant melanoma. In : Barnhill RL, Piepkorn M, Busam KJ, editors. Pathology of Melanocytic Nevi and Malignant Melanoma.
20. Bauer J, Blum A, Strohhacker U, Garbe C. Surveillance of patients at high risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma using digital dermoscopy. Br J Dermatol 2005 152 : 87 92.
21. Risser J, Pressley Z, Veledar E, et al. The impact of total body photography on biopsy rate in patients from a pigmented lesion clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007 57 : 428 434.
22. Rivers JK, Kopf AW, Vinokur AF, et al. Clinical characteristics of malignant melanomas developing in persons with dysplastic nevi. Cancer 1990 65 : 1232 1236.
23. Tiersten AD, Grin CM, Kopf AW, et al. Prospective follow-up for malignant melanoma in patients with atypical-mole (dysplastic-nevus) syndrome. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1991 17 : 44 8.
24. Halpern AC, Guerry D IV., Elder DE, et al. A cohort study of melanoma in patients with dysplastic nevi. J Invest Dermatol 1993 100 : 346S 9S.
25. MacKie RM, McHenry P, Hole D. Accelerated detection with prospective surveillance for cutaneous malignant melanoma in high-risk groups. Lancet 1993 341 : 1618 1620.
26. Cohen MH, Cohen BJ, Shotkin JD, Morrison PT. Surgical prophylaxis of malignant melanoma. Ann Surg 1991 213 : 308 314.
27. Marks R, Dorevitch AP, Mason G. Do all melanomas come from "moles"? A study of the histological association between melanocytic naevi and melanoma. Australas J Dermatol 1990 31 : 77 80.
28. Bevona C, Goggins W, Quinn T, et al. Cutaneous melanomas associated with nevi. Arch Dermatol 2003 139 : 1620 1624.
29. Weatherhead SC, Haniffa M, Lawrence CM. Melanomas arising from naevi and de novo melanomas - does origin matter? Br J Dermatol 2007 156 : 72 6.