Measures and models for causal inference in cross-sectional studies: Arguments for the appropriateness of the prevalence odds ratio and related logistic regression

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Reichenheim, Michael E ^a   Coutinho, Evandro S ^a,b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREVALENCE; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CAUSALITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PREVALENCE;

EID: 77954543891     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-66     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. B MacMahon T Pugh, Epidemiology: principles and methods Little, Brown Boston 1970
2. AM Lilienfeld DE Lilienfeld, Foundations of Epidemiology New York: Oxford University Press 2edn. 1980
3. Prevalence, incidence and duration. J Freeman GB Hutchison, Am J Epidemiol 1980 112 707 723 6969024
4. Age-specific Incidence and Prevalence: a Statistical Perspective. N Keiding, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1991 154 371 412 10.2307/2983150
5. A non-parametric method for the reconstruction of age- and time-dependent incidence from the prevalence data of irreversible diseases with differential mortality. RC Brunet CJ Struchiner, Theor Popul Biol 1999 56 76 90 10.1006/tpbi.1999.1415 10438670
6. Rate estimation from prevalence information on a simple epidemiologic model for health interventions. RC Brunet CJ Struchiner, Theor Popul Biol 1996 50 209 226 10.1006/tpbi.1996.0029 9000488
7. A method for assessing age-time disease incidence using serial prevalence data. IC Marschner, Biometrics 1997 53 1384 1398 10.2307/2533505 9423255
8. Fitting a multiplicative incidence model to age- and time-specific prevalence data. IC Marschner, Biometrics 1996 52 492 499 10.2307/2532889 8672700
9. DG Kleinbaum LL Kupper H Morgenstern, Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company 1982
10. KJ Rothman, Modern Epidemiology Boston: Little, Brown and Co 1986
11. Prevalence odds ratio v prevalence ratio. U Strömberg, Occup Environ Med 1994 51 143 144 10.1136/oem.51.2.143 7710464
12. Prevalence odds ratio v prevalence ratio - some further comments. U Strömberg, Occup Environ Med 1995 52 143 10.1136/oem.52.2.143 7757169
13. Estimation of prevalence rate ratios for cross sectional data: an example in occupational epidemiology. J Lee KS Chia, Br J Ind Med 1993 50 861 862 8398881
14. Use of the prevalence ratio v the prevalence odds ratio as a measure of risk in cross sectional studies. J Lee KS Chia, Occup Environ Med 1994 51 841 10.1136/oem.51.12.841 7849870
15. Odds ratio or relative risk for cross-sectional data? J Lee, Int J Epidemiol 1994 23 201 203 10.1093/ije/23.1.201 8194918
16. Use of the prevalence ratio v the prevalence odds ratio as a measure of risk in cross sectional studies. O Axelson M Fredriksson K Ekberg, Occup Environ Med 1994 51 574 10.1136/oem.51.8.574 7951785
17. Use of the prevalence ratio v the prevalence odds ratio in view of confounding in cross sectional studies. O Axelson M Fredriksson K Ekberg, Occup Environ Med 1995 52 494 10.1136/oem.52.7.494 7670626
18. Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done? ML Thompson JE Myers D Kriebel, Occup Environ Med 1998 55 272 277 10.1136/oem.55.4.272 9624282
19. Effect measures in prevalence studies. N Pearce, Environ Health Perspect 2004 112 1047 1050 15238274
20. On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies. S Greenland DC Thomas, Am J Epidemiol 1982 116 547 553 7124721
21. Case-control design in the study of common diseases: updates on the demise of the rare disease assumption and the choice of sampling schemes for controls. L Rodrigues BR Kirkwood, Int J Epidemiol 1990 19 205 213 10.1093/ije/19.1.205 2190942
22. Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testing. T Skov J Deddens MR Petersen L Endahl, Int J Epidemiol 1998 27 91 95 10.1093/ije/27.1.91 9563700
23. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. AJ Barros VN Hirakata, BMC Med Res Methodol 2003 3 21 10.1186/1471-2288-3-21 14567763
24. A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios. MR Petersen JA Deddens, BMC Med Res Methodol 2008 8 9 10.1186/1471-2288-8-9 18307814
25. Estimating adjusted prevalence ratio in clustered cross-sectional epidemiological data. CA Santos RL Fiaccone NF Oliveira S Cunha ML Barreto MB do Carmo AL Moncayo LC Rodrigues PJ Cooper LD Amorim, BMC Med Res Methodol 2008 8 80 10.1186/1471-2288-8-80 19087281
26. Different methods to calculate effect estimates in cross-sectional studies. A comparison between prevalence odds ratio and prevalence ratio. T Behrens D Taeger J Wellmann U Keil, Meth Inform Med 2004 43 505 509 15702210
27. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches. RJ Little DB Rubin, Annu Rev Public Health 2000 21 121 145 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.121 10884949
28. An overview of relations among causal modelling methods. S Greenland B Brumback, Int J Epidemiol 2002 31 1030 1037 10.1093/ije/31.5.1030 12435780
29. Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses. S Greenland, Am J Epidemiol 1987 125 761 768 3551588
30. KJ Rothman S Greenland TL Lash, Modern Epidemiology Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 3 3rd edition 2008
31. RLA Little DB Rubin, Statistical Analysis of Missing Data Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc 2nd edition 1992
32. Selection of controls in case-control studies.iii. disign options. S Wacholder J McLauglin D Siverman J Mandel, Am J Epidemiol 1992 135 1042 1050 1595690
33. Estimability and estimation in case-reference studies. O Miettinen, Am J Epidemiol 1976 103 226 235 1251836
34. Causation and causal inference in epidemiology. KJ Rothman S Greenland, Am J Public Health 2005 95 Suppl 1 144 S150 10.2105/AJPH.2004.059204 16030331
35. Using causal diagrams to understand problems in social epidemiology. MM Glymour, Methods in social epidemiology San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Oakes JM, Kaufman JS, 2006 393 428