Multiple long-distance scrambling: Syntax as reflections of processing

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 127-192

  Kempson, Ruth ^a   Kiaer, Jieun ^b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954542761     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226709990211     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Abe, Jun. 2006. Identification of null arguments in Japanese. Ms., Tohoku Gakuin University.
2. Aoshima, Sachiko, Colin Phillips & Amy Weinberg. 2004. Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-filler language. Journal of Memory and Language 51, 23-54.
3. Asher, Nicholas & Alex Lascarides. 2002. Logics of conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Baldridge, Jason. 2002. Lexically specified derivational control in Combinatory Categorial Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
5. Blackburn, Patrick & Wilfried Meyer-Viol. 1994. Linguistics, logic and finite trees. Bulletin of Interest Group of Pure and Applied Logics 2, 2-39.
6. Boškovič, Željko 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry, 34, 351-383.
7. Boškovič, Željko & Daiko Takahashi 1998. Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 347-366.
8. Bouzouita, Miriam. 2008a. At the syntax-pragmatics interface: Clitics in the history of Spanish. In Cooper & Kempson (eds.), 223-265.
9. Bouzouita, Miriam. 2008b. Diachronic development of Spanish object clitics. Ph.D. dissertation, King's College London.
10. Cann, Ronnie & Ruth Kempson. 2008. Production pressures, language change, and the emergence of clitic pronouns. In Cooper & Kempson (eds.), 179-230.
11. Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson & Eleni Gregoromichelaki. 2009. Semantics: The study of meaning in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson & Lutz Marten. 2005. The dynamics of language. Oxford: Elsevier.
13. Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson & Matthew Purver. 2007. Context and well-formedness: The dynamics of ellipsis. Research on Language and Computation 5, 333-358.
14. Cappelen, Hermann & Ernest Lepore. 2005. Insensitive semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Choe, Jaewoong. 1987. Anti-quantifiers and a theory of distributivity. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
17. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Cooper, Robin. 1980. Quantification and syntactic theory. Dordrecht: Reidel.
19. Cooper, Robin & Ruth Kempson (eds.). 2008. Language in flux: Dialogue dynamics in language variation, change and evolution. London: College Publications.
20. Ferreira, Victor & Hiroko Yoshita. 2003. Given-new ordering effects on the production of scrambled sentences in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32, 669-692.
21. Fong, Sandiway. 2005. Computation with probes and goals. In Anna-Maria Di Sciullo & Rodolpho Delmonte (eds.), UG and external systems: Language, brain and computation, 247-268 Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22. Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68, 1-76.
23. Gregoromichelaki, Eleni. 2006. Conditionals in Dynamic Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, King's College London.
24. Grewendorf, Gunther. 2003. Improper remnant movement. Gengo Kenkyo: Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan 123, 47-94.
25. Grice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Hawkins, John. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hawkins, John. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Hayashishita, J.-R. 2004. Syntactic and non-syntactic scope. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.
29. Hiraiwa, Ken. 2005. Dimensions of symmetries in syntax: Agreement and clausal architecture. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
30. Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical Form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.
31. Hoshi, Hiroto (ed.). 2009. The dynamics of the language faculty: Perspectives from linguistics and cognitive neuroscience. Tokyo: Kuroshio.
32. Inoue, Atsui & Janet Dean Fodor. 1995. Information-paced parsing of Japanese. In Reiko Mazuka & Noriko Nagai (eds.), Japanese sentence processing, 9-64. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Jun, Sun-Ah. 2000. K-ToBI (Korean ToBI) labelling convention Version 3. Speech Sciences 7, 143-169.
34. Kamide, Yuki & Geoffrey Mitchell. 1999. Incremental pre-head attachment in Japanese parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes 14, 631-662.
35. Kamp, Hans. 1984. A theory of meaning and semantic representation. In Theo Janssen & Mark Stokhof (eds.), Truth, interpretation, and information, 1-34. Dordrecht: Foris.
36. Kaplan, Ron & Annie Zaenen. 1989. Long-distance dependencies, constituent structure, and functional uncertainty. In Mark Baltin & Anthony Kroch (eds.), Alternative conceptions of phrase structure, 17-42. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Karimi, Simil (ed.). 2003. Word order and scrambling. Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Kempson, Ruth & Ronnie Cann. 2007. Dynamic Syntax, dialogue and syntactic change. In Joseph C. Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith (eds.), Historical linguistics 2005, 15-50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. Kempson, Ruth & Stergios Chatzikyriakidis. 2009. The Person Case Constraint as a tree-growth property. Ms., King's College London.
40. Kempson, Ruth & Annabel Cormack. 1981. Ambiguity and quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 259-309.
41. Kempson, Ruth, Eleni Gregoromichelaki & Yo Sato. 2009. Incrementality, speaker-hearer switching and the disambiguation challenge. SRSL 2009: The 2nd Workshop on Semantic Representation of Spoken Language, 74-81. Athens, Greece: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb. org/anthology/W09-0510 (30 July 2009).
42. Kempson, Ruth & Jieun Kiaer. 2009. Japanese scrambling: The dynamics of on-line processing. In Hoshi (ed.), 5-45.
43. Kempson, Ruth, Jieun Kiaer & Ronnie Cann. 2009. Topic and focus at the peripheries: The dynamics of tree growth. In Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds.), Dislocated elements in discourse: Syntactic, semantic and pragmatic perspectives, 141-170. New York: Routledge.
44. Kempson, Ruth & Akiko Kurosawa. 2009. At the syntax-pragmatics interface: Japanese relative-clause construal. In Hoshi (ed.), 47-84.
45. Kempson, Ruth & Wilfried Meyer-Viol. 2004. Indefinites and scope. In Anne Bezuidenhout & Marga Reimer (eds.), Descriptions and beyond, 558-584. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Kempson, Ruth, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Dov Gabbay. 2001. Dynamic Syntax: The flow of language understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
47. Kiaer, Jieun. 2007. Processing and interfaces in syntactic theory: The case of Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, King's College London.
48. Kiaer, Jieun & Ruth Kempson. 2006a. Pro-active parsing of Korean scrambling. The West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 24, 209-217.
49. Kiaer, Jieun & Ruth Kempson. 2006b. Pro-active parsing in Korean: At the syntax-phonology interface. European Conference on Korean Linguistics 1, 58-72.
50. Ko, Heejong. 2005. Syntactic edges and linearization. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
51. Ko, Heejong. 2007. Asymmetries in scrambling and cyclic linearization. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 315-337.
52. Koizumi, Masatoshi. 2000. String vacuous overt verb raising. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9, 227-285.
53. Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Kuroda, Sigeyuki. 1971. Remarks on the notion of subject with reference to words like also, even or only (part 2). Journal of Japanese Linguistics 11, 98-156.
55. Kurosawa, Akiko. 2003. A Dynamic Syntax account of Japanese relative clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, King's College London.
56. Mahajan, Anoop. 1997. Rightward scrambling. In Dorothee Beerman, David Leblanc & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Rightward movement, 186-214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
57. Marcus, Mitchell. 1980. A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. May, Robert. 1985. Logical form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Meyer-Viol, Wilfried. 1995. Instantial logic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.
60. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1997. Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 1-25.
61. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2003. A-movement scrambling and options without optionality. In Karimi (ed.), 177-200.
62. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2005. EPP and semantically vacuous scrambling. In Sabel & Saito (eds.), 181-220.
63. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2006. On the 'undoing' property of scrambling: A reply to Boškovič. Linguistics Inquiry 37, 607-624.
64. Miyamoto, Edson. 2002. Case markers as clause boundary inducers in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31, 307-347.
65. Müller, Gereon 1996. A constraint on remnant movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14, 355-407.
66. Muromatsu, Keiko. 2003. Classifiers and the count-mass distinction. In Audrey Li & Andrew Simpson (eds.), Functional structure(s), form and interpretation: Perspectives from East Asian languages, 65-96. London: Routledge.
67. Nordlinger, Rachel. 1998. Constructive case. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
68. Partee, Barbara & Mats Rooth. 1983. Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. In Rainer Bauerle, Urs Egli & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language, 361-383. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
69. Phillips, Colin. 1996. Order and structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
70. Phillips, Colin. 2003. Linear order and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 37-90.
71. Purver, Matthew, Ronnie Cann & Ruth Kempson. 2006. Grammars as parsers: Meeting the dialogue challenge. Research on Language and Computation 4, 289-326.
72. Rogers, James. 1994. Studies in the logic of trees with applications to grammar formalisms. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Delaware.
73. Sabel, Joachim & Mamoru Saito (eds.). 2005. The free word order phenomenon: Its syntactic sources and diversity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
74. Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
75. Saito, Mamoru. 1992. Long distance scrambling in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 69-118.
76. Saito, Mamoru. 2003. A derivational approach to interpretation of scrambling chains. Lingua 113, 481-518.
77. Saito, Mamoru. 2005. Further notes on the interpretation of scrambling chains. In Sabel & Saito (eds.), 335-376.
78. Sauerland, Uri & Paul Elbourne. 2002. Total reconstruction, PF movement and derivational order. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 283-320.
79. Sells, Peter. 1999. Postposing in Japanese. Ms., Stanford University.
80. Shirai, Ken-ichiro. 2004. Context, thought and utterance: Where context meets syntax (un)-expectedly. Ms., University of Nagoya.
81. Sperber, Daniel & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
82. Steedman, Mark & Jason Baldridge. 2003. Combinatory categorial grammar (tutorial paper). Ms., University of Edinburgh.
83. Szabolcsi, Anna. 1997. Strategies for scope taking. In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of scope taking, 109-154. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
84. Tada, Hiroaki. 1993. A/A-bar partition in derivation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
85. Takahashi, Daiko. 2008. Quantificational null objects and argument ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 39, 307-326.
86. Takano, Yuji. 2002. Surprising constituents. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11, 243-301.
87. Ueyama, Ayumi. 1998. Two types of dependency. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.