A derivational approach to the interpretation of scrambling chains

Lingua

Volumn 113, Issue 4-6, 2003, Pages 481-518

  Saito, Mamoru ^a  

^a NANZAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Binding conditions; Chain interpretation; Derivational approach to interpretation; Derivational phase; Feature decomposition; Radical reconstruction; Scrambling

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038374373     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00083-9     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ausin, A., 1998. A minimalist approach to the remnant movement constraint. MS, University of Connecticut.
2. Belletti A. Rizzi L. Psych-verbs and Θ-theory Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6 1988 291-352
3. Bošković Ž. Takahashi D. Scrambling and last resort Linguistic Inquiry 29 1998 347-366
4. Chomsky N. Lectures on Government and Binding 1981 Foris Publications Dordrecht
5. Chomsky N. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use 1986 Praeger New York
6. Chomsky N. Barriers 1986 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
7. Chomsky N. A minimalist program for linguistic theory In: Hale K. Keyser S.J. (Eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger 1993 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
8. Chomsky, N., 1994. Bare Phrase Structure. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 5.
9. Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program 1995 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
10. Chomsky, N., 1998. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 15.
11. Chomsky, N., 1999. Derivation by Phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 18.
12. Chomsky N. Lasnik H. Filters and control Linguistic Inquiry 8 1977 425-504
13. Dejima, M., 1999. A Study on Remnant-Scrambled Sentences in Japanese and their LF Representations. MA thesis, Nanzan University.
14. Diesing M. Indefinites 1992 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
15. Epstein S.D. Groat E. Kawashima R. Kitahara H. A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations 1998 Oxford University Press Oxford
16. Fukui, N., 1986. A Theory of Category Projection and its Applications. PhD dissertation, MIT.
17. Grewendorf G. Sabel J. Scrambling in German and Japanese: adjunction versus multiple specifiers Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17 1999 1-65
18. Harada K. Constraints on WH-Q binding Studies in Descriptive and Applied Linguistics 5 1972 180-206
19. Hoji, H., 1985. Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
20. Kawamura, T., 2001. A Feature-Checking Analysis of Japanese Scrambling. MA thesis, Nanzan University.
21. Kitahara H. Elementary Operations and Optiomal Derivations 1997 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
22. Kitahara, H., 2000. Case and scrambling: a derivational view. MS, Keio University.
23. Kuno, M., 2001. Why does movement sometimes leave a trace and sometimes not? MS, University of Tokyo.
24. Kuroda S.-Y. Whether we agree or not: a comparative syntax of English and Japanese In: Poser W. (Ed.), Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax 1988 CSLI Publications Stanford
25. Lasnik H. Illicit NP movement: locality conditions on chains? Linguistic Inquiry 16 1985 481-490
26. Lasnik H. Chains of arguments In: Epstein S.D. Hornstein N. (Eds.), Working Minimalism 1999 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
27. Lasnik H. Saito M. On the nature of proper government Linguistic Inquiry 15 1984 235-289
28. Lasnik H. Saito M. Move α 1992 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
29. Lebeaux, D., 1988. Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
30. Lebeaux, D., 1998. Where does the binding theory apply? MS, NEC Research Center, Princeton.
31. Lee, R. K., 1994. Economy of representation. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
32. Mahajan, A., 1990. The A/A-Bar Distinction and Movement Theory. PhD dissertation, MIT.
33. Miyagawa S. Against optional scrambling Linguistic Inquiry 28 1997 1-25
34. Miyagawa, S., 2000. The EPP, scrambling, and wh-in situ. MS, MIT.
35. Müller G. A constraint on remnant movement Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14 1996 355-407
36. Murasugi, K., 1991. Noun Phrases in Japanese and English. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
37. Nakamura M. Sokubaku Kankei (Binding Relations) 1996 Hitsuji Shobo Tokyo
38. Nemoto, N., 1993. Chains and Case Positions: A Study from Scrambling in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
39. Riemsdijk H.van Williams E. NP-structure The Linguistic Review 1 1981 171-217
40. Saito, M., 1985. Some Asymmetries in Japanese and their Theoretical Implications. PhD dissertation, MIT.
41. Saito M. Scrambling as semantically vacuous A′-movement In: Baltin M. Kroch A. (Eds.), Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure 1989 University of Chicago Press Chicago
42. Saito M. Long distance scrambling in Japanese Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1 1992 69-118
43. Saito M. Improper adjunction MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 24 1994 263-293
44. Saito, M., 1995. Radical reconstruction. MS, University of Connecticut.
45. Saito M. Barriers for A-adjunction Japanese/Korean Linguistics 5 1996 1-36
46. Saito, M., 2000. Japanese scrambling in a comparative perspective. MS, Nanzan University.
47. Saito M. Fukui N. Order in phrase structure and movement Linguistic Inquiry 29 1998 439-474
48. Saito M. Hoshi H. The Japanese light verb construction and the minimalist program In: Martin R. Michaels D. Uriagereka J. (Eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik 2000 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
49. Tada, H., 1990. Scrambling(s). MS, MIT.
50. Tada, H., 1993. A/A-bar partition in derivation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
51. Takano Y. Object shift and scrambling Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16 1998 817-889
52. Ura H. Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Universal Grammar 2000 Oxford University Press Oxford
53. Yatsushiro, K., 1999. Case Licensing and VP Structure. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
54. Yoshimura, N., 1989. Parasitic pronouns. MS, University of Southern California.