Nutritional values of sugarcane products in local Caribbean growing pigs

Animal

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 745-754

  Xande X ^a   Regnier C ^a   Archimede H ^a   Bocage, B ^b   Noblet, J ^b   Renaudeau, D ^a  

^a Unite de Recherches Zootechniques Pointe a Pitre   (Guadeloupe)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Creole pig; digestibility; energy value; sugarcane products

Indexed keywords

SUIDAE;

EID: 77954538520     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S175173110999173X     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.
2. Bayley HS, Figueroa V, Ly J, Maylin A and Perez A 1983. Utilisation of sugarcane final molasses by the pig: energy metabolism. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 63, 455-462.
3. Bravo M, Lasso M, Esnaola MA and Preston TR 1996. Preliminary studies on the use of chopped sugarcane stalks as the basal diet for fattening pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development 8. Retrieved from http://www.cipav.org. co/lrrd/lrrd8/3/bravo83.htm
4. Brooks CC 1967. Effect of sex, fat, fibre, molasses and thyroprotein on digestibility of nutrients and performance of growing swine. Journal of Animal Science 26, 495-499.
5. Christon R and Le Dividich J 1978. Utilisation de la mélasse de canne à sucre dans l'alimentation du porc: essai d'interpré tation des acquisitions ré centes. Annales de Zootechnie 27, 267-288.
6. Figueroa V, Maylin A, Ly J, Pé rez A, Carrillo O and Bayley HS 1990. Ileal and total digestibility studies in pigs fed molasses type A or starch diets supplemented with torula yeast or soybean meal. Livestock Production Science 25, 151-161.
7. Gonzàlez D, Gonzàlez C, Ojeda A, Machado W and Ly J 2006. Growth performance of pigs feed sugarcane juice (Saccharum officinarum) and mulberry leaf meal (Morus alba). Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producció n Animal 14, 42-48.
8. Henry Y and Etienne M 1969. Effets nutritionnels de l'incorporation de cellulose purifiée dans le ré gime du porc en croissance-finition. 1-Influence sur l'utilisation digestive des nutriments. Annales de Zootechnie 18, 337-357.
9. Le Goff G and Noblet J 2001. Comparative total tract digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2418-2427.
10. Le Goff G, van Milgen J and Noblet J 2002. Influence of dietary fibre on digestive utilisation and rate of passage in growing pigs, finishing pigs and adult sows. Animal Science 74, 503-515. (Pubitemid 34853675)
11. Ly MVJ and Preston TR 1969. Digestible and metabolisable energy values for pigs of diets based on high-test molasses or final molasses and sugar. Journal of Animal Science 29, 578-580.
12. Meade GP and Chen JCP 1977. Cane sugar handbook; a manual for cane sugar manufacturers and their chemists, 10th edition. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA.
13. Mederos CM, Figueroa V, Garcia A, Aleman E, Martinez RM and Ly J 2004. Growth performance of pigs fed hand-chopped sugarcane stalks. Livestock Research for Rural Development 16. Retrieved from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/3/ med16014.htm
14. Noblet J and Shi XS 1994. Effect of body weight on digestive utilisation of energy and nutrients of ingredients and diets in pigs. Livestock Production Science 72, 323-338.
15. Noblet J, Bontems V and Tran G 2003. Estimation de la valeur énergétique des aliments chez le porc. INRA Productions Animales 16, 197-210.
16. Noblet J, Shi XS, Fortune H, Dubois S, Lechevestrier Y, Corniaux C, Sauvant D and Henry Y 1994. Teneur en énergie nette des aliments chez le porc. Mesure, pré diction et validation aux diffé rents stades de sa vie. Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France 26, 235-250.
17. Preston TR 1995. Research, extension and training for sustainable farming systems in the tropics. Livestock Research for Rural Development 7. Retrieved from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd7/2/1.htm
18. Preston TR and Leng RA 1989. The greenhouse effect and its implications for world agriculture. The need for environmentally friendly development. Livestock research for rural development. 1. Retrieved from http://www.cipav. org.co/lrrd/lrrd1/1/preston.htm
19. Preston TR, MacLeod NA, Lassota L, Willis MB and Velazquez M 1968. Sugar cane products as energy sources for pigs. Nature 219, 727-730.
20. Renaudeau D, Bocage B and Noblet J 2006. Influence of energy intake on protein and lipid deposition in Creole and Large White growing pigs in a humid tropical climate. Animal Science 82, 937-945.
21. Rostagno HS 2005. Brazilian tables for poultry and swine: composition of feedstuffs and nutritional requirements, 2th edition. Universidade Federal de Viçosa. Departamento de zootecnìa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 186p.
22. SAS Institute Inc. 1997. SAS/STAT user's guide: version 7, 4th edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
23. Sauvant D, Perez JM and Tran G 2002. Tables de composition et de valeur nutritive des matiè res premiè res destinées aux animaux d'élevage. AFZ-INRA, pp. 1-301.
24. Tollier MTh and Robin JP 1979. Adaptation de la mé thode à l'orcinol sulfurique au dosage automatique des glucides neutres totaux: conditions d'application aux extraits d'origine végé tale. Annales de Technologie Agricole 28, 1-15.
25. Van Soest PJ and Wine RH 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of the AOAC 50, 50-55.
26. Xandé X, Despois E, Giorgi M, Gourdine JL, Archimède H and Renaudeau D 2009. Influence of sugarcane diets and a high fibre commercial diet on growth and carcass performance in local Caribbean pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 22, 90-98.