Climate policy to defeat the green paradox

Ambio

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 223-235

  FÖlster, Stefan ^a   NystrÖm, Johan ^b  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b Pyry Management Consulting (Sweden) AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Climate policy; Green paradox; Rebound effect

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EMISSION INVENTORY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FEEDBACK MECHANISM; GLOBAL WARMING; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT; KYOTO PROTOCOL; POLLUTION POLICY; SUBSIDY SYSTEM;

AIR POLLUTANT; CARBON DIOXIDE;

AIR POLLUTANT; ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPEAN UNION; GEOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MANAGEMENT; POLICY; PREVENTION AND CONTROL;

AIR POLLUTANTS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EUROPEAN UNION; GEOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 77954534034     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-010-0030-7     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Allan, G., N. Hanley, P. McGregor, J. K. Swales, and K. Turner. 2007. The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom. Energy Economics 29(4):779-798.
2. Angelsen, A. 2008. Moving ahead with REDD. Issues, options and implications. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
3. Anson, S., and K. Tuner. 2009. Rebound and disinvestment effects in oil consumption and supply resulting from an increase in energy efficiency in the Scottish commercial transport sector. Strathclyde Discussion Papers in Economics No. 09-01.
4. Babiker, M. H. 2005. Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. Journal of International Economics 65:421-445.
5. Barker, T., A. Dagoumas, and J. Rubin. 2009. The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy. Journal Energy Efficiency 2(4):411-427.
6. Bentzen, J. 2004. Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption. Energy Economics 26:123-134.
7. Binswanger, M. 2001. Technological progress and sustainable development: What about the rebound effect? Ecological Economics 36:119-132.
8. Blair, R. D., D. Kaserman, and R. C. Tepel. 1984. The impact of improved mileage on gasoline consumption. Economic Inquiry 22:209-217.
9. Bottazzi, L., D. R. Marco, and T. Hellmann. 2004. The changing face of the European venture capital industry: Facts and analysis. Journal of Private Equity 8 (1).
10. Bränlund, R. 2007. Miljöpolitik utan kostnader? En kritisk granskning av Porterhypotesen. Expertgruppen för miljöstudier 2
11. Brännlund, R., T. Ghalwash, and J. Nordstrom. 2007. Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect: Effects on consumption and emissions. Energy Economics 29:1-17.
12. Carlsson-Kanyama, A., A. Getachew, G. Peters, and A. Wadeskog. 2007. Koldioxidutsläpp till följd av Sveriges import och konsumtion-beräkningar med olika metoder. KTH, TRITA-IM 11.
13. CE Delft. 2008. Impacts on competitiveness from EU ETS.
14. Climate Strategies. 2007. Differentiation and dynamics of EU ETS industrial competitiveness impacts.
15. Copenhagen Economics. 2009. Klimatavtal-Jobb och utsläpp.
16. Damm, D. L., and A. G. Fedorov. 2008. Conceptual study of distributed CO2 capture and the sustainable carbon economy. Energy Conversion and Management 49 (6).
17. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Danish solutions to global environmental challenges.
18. Dealflower. 2003. Varför investerar inte det svenska riskkapitalet i förnyelsebar och klimateffektiv energiteknik? konsultrapport beställd av NUTEK.
19. Dimitropolous, J. 2007. Energy productivity improvements and the rebound effect: An overview of the state of knowledge. Energy Policy 35:6354-6363.
20. Dinan, T. M. 1987. An analysis of the impact of residential retrofit on indoor temperature choice. Oak Ridge: Oake Ridge National Laboratory.
21. Dubin, J. M., A. K. Miedema, and R. V. Chandran. 1986. Price effects of energy-efficient technologies: A study of residential demand for heating and cooling. Rand Journal of Economics 17:310-325.
22. EC. 2001. Community guidelines on state aid for environmental protection. 2001/C 37/03.
23. EC. 2007. Report of the environmental technologies action plan (2005-2006). COM/2007/0162
24. Final. EC. 2008a. Annex to the impact assessment: Package implementation measures for the EU's objectives on climate change and renewable energy 2020.
25. EC. 2008b. Commission services paper on energy insensitive industries exposed to significant risk of carbon leakage.
26. Eichner, Thomas, and Pethig, Rüdinger. 2009. Carbon leakage, the green paradox and perfect future markets. CESIFO Working Paper No. 2542, February 2009.
27. Employ RES. 2009. The impact of renewable energy policy on economic growth and employment in the European Union. Final report prepared for the European Commission, DG Energy and Transport.
28. Ernst, J., and L. L. P. Young. 2008. Transformation Cleantech: Enabling the business response to climate change.
29. Felder, S., and T. F. Rutherford. 1993. Unilateral CO2 reductions and carbon leakage: The consequences of international trade in oil and basic materials. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25(2):162-176.
30. Fouquet, R., and P. Pearson. 2006. Seven centuries of energy services: The price and use of light in the United Kingdom (1300-2000). International Association for Energy Economics 27(1):138-178.
31. Fowles, M. 2007. Black carbon sequestration as an alternative to bioenergy. Biomass & Bioenergy 31(6):426-432.
32. Frondel, M., J. Peters, and C. Vance. 2007. Identifying the rebound-Evidence from a German household panel. Ruhr Economic Paper No. 32.
33. Gately, D. 1990. The US demand for highway travel and motor fuel. Energy Journal 11:59-73.
34. Gerlagh, R. O., and O. Kuik. 2007. Carbon leakage with international technology spillovers, Nota di Lavoaro 33. Milano: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
35. Glomsrod, S., and W. Taojuan. 2005. Coal cleaning: A viable strategy for reduced carbon emissions and improved environment in China? Energy Policy 33:525-542.
36. Gompers, P., and J. Lerner. 2001. The venture capital revolution. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(2):145-168.
37. Greene, D. L. 1992. Vehicle use and fuel economy: How big is the rebound effect? Energy Journal 13:117-143.
38. Greene, D. L., J. Kahn, and R. Gibson. 1999. Fuel economy rebound effect for US household's vehicles. Energy Journal 20:1-32.
39. Greening, L., D. Greene, and C. Difiglio. 2000. Energy efficiency and consumption-The rebound effect. A survey. Energy Policy 28:389-401.
40. Hanley, N., P. McGregor, J. K. Swales, and K. Turner. 2008. Do increases in resource productivity improve environmental quality and sustainability? Ecological Economics 68(3):692-709.
41. Haughton, J., and S. Sarker. 1996. Gasoline tax as a corrective tax: estimates for the United Stated, 1970-1991. The Energy Journal 17:103-126.
42. Hellman, T., and M. Puri. 2002. Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Finance 57(1):169-197.
43. Hirst, E. 1987. Changes in indoor after retrofit based on electricity billing and weather data. Energy System Policy 10:1-20.
44. Ho, M. S., R. Morgenstern, and J. S. Shih. 2008. Impact of carbon price policies on U. S. industry. RFF Discussion Paper No. 08-37.
45. Hoel, M., and S. Kverndokk. 1996. Depletion of fossil fuels and the impacts of global warming. Resource and Energy Economics 18:115-136.
46. Holmgren, K., E. Eriksson, O. Olsson, M. Olsson, B. Hillring, and M. Parikka. 2007. Biobränsle och klimatneutralitet-systemanalys av produktion och användning. Elforsk rapport 07:35.
47. Elforsk. IEA. 2005. Industrial competitiveness under the European emissions trading scheme.
48. International Council for Science. 2009. Biofuels: Environmental consequences and interactions with changing land use. Issued April 2, 2009.
49. IPCC. 2007. The physical science basis working group I. The Fourth Assessment Report.
50. ITPS. 2008. Svensk miljöteknik-En kartläggning av aktörer, marknader och konkurrenter.
51. Kågesson, P. 2009. Miljöbil på villovägar: hur klarar Sverige EU:s krav på snåla fordon och förnybara drivmedel? SNS Förlag.
52. Khazzoom, J. D. 1986. An econometric model integrating conservation measures in the residential demand for electricity. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
53. Laitner, J. A. 2000. Energy efficiency: Rebounding to a sound analytical perspective. Energy Policy 28:471-475.
54. Leung, P. S., and M. H. Vesenka. 1987. Forecasting a state-specific demand for highways fuels. Energy System Policy 10:167-188.
55. Lindström, G., and C. Olofsson. 1998. Teknikbaserade företag i tidig utvecklingsfas, Institute for Technology and Management.
56. Marschinski, R., M. Jakob, and O. Edenhofer. 2008. Analysis of carbon leakage in an extended Ricardo-Viner model. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
57. Mayo, J. W., and J. E. Mathis. 1988. The effectiveness of mandatory fuel efficiency standards of reducing demand for gasoline. Applied Economics 20:211-219.
58. McKinsey. 2006. Report on international competitiveness.
59. Mizobuchi, K. 2008. An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs. Energy Economics 30:2486-2516.
60. Nutek. 2007. Investera i CleanTech 2007.
61. OECD. 2008. The economics of climate change mitigation: Policies and options for the future.
62. Paltsev, S. V. 2001. The Kyoto Protocol: Regional and sectoral contributions to the carbon leakage. The Energy Journal 22:53-79.
63. Popp, D. 2006. R&D subsidies and climate policy: Is there a "free lunch"? Climate Change 77:311-341.
64. Profu. 2008. Nordic perspectives on the EU goals relating to CO2, renewable energy and energy efficiency.
65. Roy, J. 2000. The rebound effect: Some empirical evidence for India. Energy Policy 28:433-438.
66. Rubio, S., and L. Esriche. 2001. Strategic Pigouvian taxation, stock externalities and polluting nonrenewable resources. Journal of Public Ecoomics 79:297-313.
67. Rutledge, D. 2007. The coal question and climate change. The Oil Drum, http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2697.
68. Saunders, H. D. 2008. Fuel conserving (and using) production functions. Energy Economics 5:2184-2235.
69. Schurr, S. H. 1985. Energy conservation and productivity growth: Can we have both? Energy Policy 13(2):32-126.
70. SIKA. 2007. Bantrafik 2006.
71. Sinn, H.-W. 2007. Public policies against global warming. NBER Working Paper No. 13454.
72. Sinn, H.-W. 2008. Public policies against global warming. International Tax and Public Finance 15:360-394.
73. 2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices. Climate Policy 6(1):31-48.
74. Sorrell, S., J. Dimitropoulos, and M. Sommerville. 2009. Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy Policy 37(4):1356-1371.
75. Stern, N. 2006. The economics of climate change: The Stern review. http://www.hm-treasury.gov. uk.
76. Svensk Energi. 2008. Elåret 2006.
77. Swentec. 2008. Svenska strategier och initiativ för främjande av miljöteknik.
78. Turner, K. 2009. Negative rebound and disinvestment effects in response to an improvement in energy efficiency in the UK economy. Energy Economics 31(5):648-666.
79. Walker, I. O., and F. Wirl. 1993. Asymmetric energy demand due to endogenous efficiencies: An empirical investigation of the transport sector. Energy Journal 14:183-205.
80. Wei, T. 2009. A general equilibrium view of global rebound effects. CICERO Working Paper No. 2009:02.
81. Weinblatt, H. 1989. The FHWA/Faucett VMT forecasting model. Bethesda, MA: Jack Faucett Associates.
82. Weitzman, M. L. 1974. Prices vs. Quantities. Review of Economic Studies 41:477-491.