Comparison of mobile phone user interface design preferences: Perspectives from nationality and disability culture

Mobility Conference 2007 - The 4th Int. Conf. Mobile Technology, Applications and Systems, Mobility 2007, Incorporating the 1st Int. Symp. Computer Human Interaction in Mobile Technology, IS-CHI 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 512-519

  Jhangiani, Ira ^a   Smith Jackson, Tonya ^b  

^a MOTOROLA INC   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cell phone interfaces; cross cultural studies; design preferences; disability culture; product interactive focus groups

Indexed keywords

CELL PHONE; CROSS-CULTURAL DIFFERENCES; CROSS-CULTURAL STUDIES; CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY; FOCUS GROUPS; MOBILE PHONE INTERFACES; MOBILE-PHONE USERS; RESEARCH STUDIES; USERS WITH DISABILITIES; VISUAL DISABILITY;

CELL CULTURE; CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEMS; DESIGN; GROUP TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MOBILE PHONES; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; SOCIAL SCIENCES; TECHNOLOGY; TELEPHONE; TELEPHONE SETS; USER INTERFACES;

TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT;

EID: 77954522232     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1378063.1378146     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Jordan, P.W., Designing Pleasurable Products. 2000: Taylor and Francis.
2. Kiljander, H. and J. Johanna, Dominant Design in Mobile User Interfaces: User Interface Styles, in Mobile Usability: How Nokia Changed the Face of the Mobile Phone, C. Lindholm, T. Keinonen, and H. Kiljander, Editors. 2003, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
3. C.I.A.-The World Fact Book. 2006 September 7 2006 [cited 2006 March 20]; Available from: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html.
4. Newell, A.F. and P. Gregor. User Sensitive Inclusive Design. in JIM 2001. 2001. France.
5. Hofstede, G., Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 1997: McGraw-Hill. 273.
6. Choi, B., et al. A Qualitative Cross-National Study of Cultural Influences on Mobile Data Service Design. in CHI 2005. 2005. Portland, Oregon, USA: ACM.
7. Marcus, A. and E.W. Gould, Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design. Interactions, 2000. 7(4): p. 32-46.
8. Rose, K., Intercultural Human-Machine Systems: Emperical Study of User Requirements in Mainland China, in Usability and Internationalization of Information Technology, N. Aykin, Editor. 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers: Mahwah, New Jersey.
9. Aykin, N., Overview: Where to start and What to Consider, in Usability and Internationalization of Information Technology, N. Aykin, Editor. 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers: Mahwah, New Jersey.
10. Vijver, F.v.d. and K. Leung, Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Cross-Cultural Psychology Series, ed. W.J. Lonner and J.W. Berry. 1997: Sage Publications. 186.
11. Population Reference Bureau Country Statistics, P.R. Bureau, Editor. 2006.
12. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. 2006.
13. Jenkins, T., Towards a Convention on Disabilities, U.N. Department of Public Information, Editor. 2004, News &Media Division. p. 1-10.
14. Newell, A.F., Extra-ordinary human-computer interaction, in Extra-ordinary human-computer interaction: Interfaces for Users with Disabilities, A.D.N. Edwards, Editor. 1995, Cambridge University Press: New York, New York.
15. Gould, E.W., Synthesizing the Literature on Cultural Values, in Usability and Internationalization of Information Technology, N. Aykin, Editor. 2005, Laurence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, New Jersey. p. 74-121.
16. Christie, P.M.J., et al., A Cross-cultural comparison of Ethical Attitudes of Business Managers: India, Korea and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 2003. 46: p. 263-287.
17. Kerston, G.E., M.A. Kerston, and W.M. Rakowski, Software and Culture: Beyond the Internationalization of the Culuture. Journal Of Global Information Management, 2002. 10(4): p. 86-101.
18. Hofstede, G. Values Survey Module 1994. 1994 [cited 2005 June 8]; Available from: http://feweb.uvt.nl/center/hofstede/VSM.html.
19. Peters, S., Is There a Disability Culture? A Syncretisation of Three Possible World Views. Disability & Society, 2000. 15(4): p. 583-601.
20. Brown, S.E. Disability Culture. Independent Living Institute Newsletter 2001-12 2001 [cited 2005 November 20]; Available from: http://www. independentliving.org/newsletter/12-01.html#anchor1.
21. Lee, Y.S., et al. Design Considerations for Accessible Mobile Phones. in HFES' 06. 2006. San Fansisco, CA, USA.
22. Smith-Jackson, T., M.A. Nussbaum, and A.M. Mooney, Accessible cell phone design: development and application of a needs analysis framework. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2003. 25(10): p. 549-560.
23. Mooney, A.M., Usability Evaluation of Notebook Computers and Cellular Telephones Among Users With Visual and Upper Extremity Disabilities, in ISE. 2002, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: Blacksburg, Virginia. p. 257.
24. Hines, A.M., Linking Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Cross-Cultural Survey Research: Techniques from Cognitive Science. American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 2 No. 6, 1993, 1993. 2(6): p. 729-746.
25. Barber, W. and A. Badre. Culturability: The Merging of Culture and Usability. in 4th Conference on Human Factors & the Web. 1998. New Jersey.
26. Kim, J.H. and K.P. Lee. Cultural Differences and Mobile Phone Interface Design: Icon Recognition According to Level of Abstraction. in Mobile HCI. 2005. Salzburg, Austria: ACM.
27. Harrison, C.M., Low-vision reading aids: reading as a pleasurable experience. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2004. 8(3-4): p. 213-220.