Accessible cell phone design: Development and application of a needs analysis framework

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 549-560

  Smith Jackson, Tonya L ^a   Nussbaum, Maury A ^a   Mooney, Aaron M ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; TELECOMMUNICATION;

CELLULAR PHONE; DISABLED PERSONS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; SELF-HELP DEVICES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038476243     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0963828031000071732     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson RH, Bikson TK, Law SA, Mitchell BM. Universal access to email: Feasibility and Societal Implications. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1995.
2. Emiliani PL. Special needs and enabling technologies: An evolving approach to accessibility. In: C Stephanidis (ed) User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001; 97-114.
3. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. 1997; IDEA 20: USC, Ch 33, Section 1401 (25) US.
4. Wilson KB. Assisted living as a model of care delivery. In: Gamroth, L. M., et al. Enhancing autonomy in long-term care: Concepts and Strategies. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, 1995.
5. Yeager DM. Independent living: Perceptions, realities, and guidelines. Activities, Adaptation, and Aging 1996; 20: 1-11.
6. Schuler D, Namioka A. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
7. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: Free Press, 1995.
8. Smith-Jackson TL, Williges RC. User-centered design of telesupport systems. Assistive Technology 2001; 13: 144-169.
9. Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. New York: Academic Press, 1992.
10. Stephanidis C, Salvendy D, Akoumianakis D, Arnold A, Bevan N, Dardailler D, Emiliani PL, Iakouidis I, Jenkins P, Karshmer A, Korn P, Marcus A, Murphy H, Oppermann C, Stary C, Tamura H, Tscheligi M, Veda H, Weber G, Ziegler J. Toward an information society for all: HCI challenges and R & D recom-mendations. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 1999; 11: 1-28.
11. Shapiro JP. No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York, NY: Times Books (Random House), 1994.
12. Palen L, Salzman M. Beyond the handset: Designing for wireless communications usability. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 2002; 9: 125-151.
13. Scherer MJ. Editorial: The change in emphasis from people to person. Introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 1-4.
14. Yassi A, Cooper JE, Tate RB, Gerlach S, Muir M, Trottier J, Massey K. A randomized controlled trial to prevent patient lift and transfer injuries of health care workers. Spine 2001; 26: 1739-1746.
15. Kumar S. Disability, injury and ergonomics intervention. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001; 23: 805-814.
16. Kohn JG, LeBlanc M, Mortola P. Measuring quality and performance of Assistive technology: results of a prospective monitoring program. Assistive Technology 1994; 6: 120-125.
17. Stevens R. Last words on the (project) flight recording: A plea for user requirements. Requirements Engineering 1997; 2: 61-62.
18. Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983.
19. Brewster S. Overcoming the lack of screen space on mobile computers. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 2002; 6: 188-205.
20. Chincholle D. Designing highly usable mobile services for small display devices. 15th Annual Conference of the Human-Computer Interaction Group of the British Computer Society. IHM-HCI 2001. Cepadues-Editions, 2001; pp. 225-6 Toulouse, France.
21. Parks AM, Ward N. Case study: a safety and usability evaluation of two different carphone designs. International Journal of Vehicle Design 2001; 26: 12-29.
22. Gilb T. Towards the engineering of requirements. Requirements Engineering 1997; 2: 165-169.
23. Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H, Benyon D, Holland S, Carey T. Human-Computer Interaction. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1994.
24. Rosson MB, Carroll JM. Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2002.
25. Chatzoglou PD, Macaulay LA. Requirements capture and analysis: A survey of current practice. Requirements Engineering 1996; 1: 75-87.
26. Wilson JR, Corlett EN. Evaluation of human work: A practical ergonomics methodology. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis, 1990.
27. Scherer MJ, Lane JP. Assessing consumer profiles of 'ideal' assistive technologies in ten categories: An integration of quantitative and qualitative methods. Disability & Rehabilitation 1997; 19: 528-535.
28. Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN. Focus groups: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc, 1990.
29. Leedy P. Practical Research, Planning and Design. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 1993.
30. Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc 1990.
31. Cook AM. Future directions in assistive technology. In: MJ Scherer (ed) Assistive technology: Matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2002; pp. 269-279.