The use of STAN monitoring in the labour ward

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 465-469

  Ragupathy, K ^a   Ismail, F ^a   Nicoll, A E ^a  

^a NINEWELLS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Neonatal metabolic acidosis; ST analysis; STAN

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CONTINUOUS INTRAPARTUM CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS DISTRESS; FETUS ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FETUS MONITORING; HUMAN; LABOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METABOLIC ACIDOSIS; NEONATAL METABOLIC ACIDOSIS; OBSTETRIC CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QRS COMPLEX; ST SEGMENT; ST SEGMENT ANALYSIS; T WAVE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; WARD; ACIDOSIS, LACTIC; ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FETAL HYPOXIA; FETUS HEART RATE; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROCEDURES;

ACIDOSIS, LACTIC; ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FETAL HYPOXIA; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY, HIGH-RISK; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77954520421     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: 13646893     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2010.482218     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GML. 2006. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3):CD006066.
2. Amer-Wahlin I, Arulkumaran S, Hagberg H, Marsal K, Visser GH. 2007. Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intra-partum surveillance. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 114:1191-1193.
3. Ayres-de-Campos D, Sousa P, Costa A, Bernardes J. 2008. Omniview-SisPorto 3.5 - a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram+ST event analysis. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 36:260-264.
4. CEMACH. 2009. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) Perinatal Mortality 2007: England, Wales and Northern Ireland. London: CEMACH.
5. Costa A, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa F, Santos C, Bernardes J. 2009. Prediction of neonatal acidemia by computer analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 201:464.e1-464.e6.
6. Doria V, Papageorghiou AT, Gustafsson A, Ugwumadu A, Farrer K, Arulkumaran S. 2007. Review of the first 1502 cases of ECGST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1202-1207.
7. Heintz E, Brodtkorb TH, Nelson N, Levin LA. 2008. The longterm cost-effectiveness of fetal monitoring during labour: a comparison of cardiotocography complemented with ST analysis versus cardiotocography alone. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115:1676-1687.
8. Kale A, Chong YS, Biswas A. 2008. Effect of availability of fetal ECG monitoring on operative deliveries. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 87:1189-1193.
9. Luttkus AK,Norén H, Stupin JH, Blad S, Arulkumaran S, Erkkola R, et al. 2004. Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to CTG. Journal of PerinatalMedicine 32:486-494.
10. Massoud M, Giannesi A, Amabile N, Manevy M, Geron G, Gaucherand P. 2007. Fetal electrocardiotocography in labor and neonatal outcome: An observational study in 1889 patients in the French center of Edouard Herriot, Lyon. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 20:819-824.
11. Norén H, Blad S, Carlsson A, Flisberg A, Gustavsson A, Lilja H, et al. 2006. STAN in clinical practice - the outcome of 2 years of regular use in the city of Gothenburg. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 195:7-15.
12. Ojala K, Mäkikallio K, Haapsamo M, Ijäs H, Tekay A. 2008. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 87:536-540.
13. Parisaei M, Harrington K, Erskine K. 2009. Maternal satisfaction and acceptability of foetal electrocardiographic (STAN1) monitoring system. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 30 October [Epub ahead of print].
14. Rault S, Vayssiere C, Roth E, David E, Favre R, Langer B. 2008. Assessment of STAN S21 fetal heart monitor by medical staff. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 102:8-11.
15. RCOG. 2005. Operative vaginal delivery. Guideline No. 26. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
16. Vayssière C, David E, Meyer N, Haberstich R, Sebahoun V, Roth E, et al. 2007. A French randomized controlled trial of STsegment analysis in a population with abnormal cardiotocograms during labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 197:299.e1-299.e6.
17. Vayssière C, Tsatsaris V, Pirrello O, Cristini C, Arnaud C, Goffinet F. 2009. Inter-observer agreement in clinical decisionmaking for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 116:1081-1087.
18. Westerhuis ME, Kwee A, van Ginkel AA, Drogtrop AP, Gyselaers WJ, Visser GH. 2007. Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 114:1194-1201.