Unstructured finite volume discretization of two-dimensional depth-averaged shallow water equations with porosity

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 903-930

  Cea, L ^a   Vazquez Cendon M E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Depth averaged models; Finite volume method; High order schemes; Porosity; Roe scheme; Shallow water equations; Unstructured mesh

Indexed keywords

DEPTH-AVERAGED MODELS; HIGH-ORDER SCHEME; HIGH-ORDER SCHEMES; ROE SCHEME; SHALLOW WATER EQUATIONS; UNSTRUCTURED MESHES;

DRAG; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; STREAM FLOW; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

POROSITY;

EID: 77954515692     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2107     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bates PD, Marks KJ, Horrit MS. Optimal use of high-resolution topographic data in flood inundation models. Hydrological Processes 2003; 17:5237-5257.
2. Cea L, French J, Vázquez-Cendón ME. Numerical modelling of tidal flows in complex estuaries including turbulence: an unstructured finite volume solver and experimental validation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2006; 67(13):1909-1932.
3. French JR. Hydrodynamic modelling of estuarine flood defence realignment as an adaptive management response to sea-level rise. Journal of Coastal Research 2008; 24(2B):1-12.
4. Horrit MS, Bates PD. Predicting floodplain inundation: raster-based modelling versus the finite-element approach. Hydrological Processes 2001; 15:825-842.
5. Horrit MS, Bates PD, Mattison MJ. Effects of mesh resolution and topographic representation in 2D finite volume models of shallow water fluvial flow. Journal of Hydrology 2006; 329:306-314.
6. Mason DC, Cobby DM, Horrit MS, Bates PD. Floodplain friction parametrization in two-dimensional river flood models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hydrological Processes 2003; 17:1711-1732.
7. Aronica GT, Lanza JG. Drainage efficiency in urban areas: a case study. Hydrological Processes 2005; 19(5): 1105-1119.
8. Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K. A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. Journal of Hydrology 2003; 277:24-49.
9. Hunter NM, Bates PD, Neelz S, Pender G, Villanueva I, Wright NG, Liang D, Falconer RA, Lin B, Waller S, Crossley AJ, Mason DC. Benchmarking 2D hydraulic models for urban flooding. Water Management 2008; 161:13-30.
10. Mason DC, Horrit MS, Hunter NM, Bates PD. Use of fused airborne scanning laser altimetry and digital map data for urban flood modelling. Hydrological Processes 2007; 21:1436-1447.
11. Mignot E, Paquier A, Haider S. Modeling floods in a dense urban area using 2D shallow water equations. Journal of Hydrology 2006; 327(1-2):186-199.
12. Schubert JE, Sanders BF, Smith MJ, Wright NG. Unstructured mesh generation and landcover-based resistance for hydrodynamic modeling of urban flooding. Advances in Water Resources 2008; 31:1603-1621.
13. Guinot V, Soares-Frazao S. Flux and source term discretization in two-dimensional shallow water models with porosity on unstructured grids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2006; 50(3):309-345.
14. Soares-Frazao S, Lhomme J, Guinot V, Zech Y. Two-dimensional shallow-water model with porosity for urban flood modeling. Journal of Hydraulic Research 2008; 46(1):45-64.
15. Roe PL. A basis for the upwind differencing of the two-dimensional unsteady Euler equations. Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics 1986; 2:55-80.
16. Bermúdez A, Vázquez-Cendón ME. Upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws with source terms. Computers and Fluids 1994; 23(8):1049-1071.
17. Hubbard ME, García-Navarro P. Flux difference splitting and the balancing of source terms and flux gradients. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 165:89-125.
18. Cea L, Puertas J, Vázquez-Cendón ME. Depth averaged modelling of turbulent shallow water flow with wet-dry fronts. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering (ARCME) 2007; 14(3):303-341.
19. Rodi W. Turbulence models and their applications in hydraulics-a state of the art review. The Netherlands International Association of Hydraulic Research, Delft, The Netherlands, 1980.
20. Roe PL. Discrete models for the numerical analysis of time-dependent multidimensional gas dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 1986; 63:458-476.
21. Toro EF. Shock-capturing Methods for Free-surface Shallow Flows. Wiley: Chichester, West Sussex, England, 2001.
22. Bermúdez A, Dervieux A, Desideri JA, Vázquez-Cendón ME. Upwind schemes for the two-dimensional shallow water equations with variable depth using unstructured meshes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 155:49-72.
23. Bouchut F. Nonlinear Stability of the Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws and Well-balance Schemes for Sources. Frontiers in Mathematics. Birkhäuser: Basel, 2004.
24. Gallardo J, Parés C, Castro M. On a well-balanced high-order finite volume scheme for shallow water equations with topography and dry areas. Journal of Computational Physics 2007; 227(1):574-601.
25. Cea L, Pena L, Puertas J, Vázquez-Cendón ME, Peña E. Application of several depth-averaged turbulence models to simulate flow in vertical slot fishways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 2007; 133(2):160-172.
26. Brunner GW. Hec-Ras River Analysis System. Hydraulic Reference Manual, US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC), Davis, CA, 2002.