Fast performance uncertainty estimation via pushover and approximate IDA

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 683-703

  Fragiadakis, Michalis ^a,b   Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios ^c  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

Epistemic uncertainty; Incremental dynamic analysis; moment estimating methods; Performance based earthquake engineering; Simulation; Static pushover analysis

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; CIVIL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKES; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; ESTIMATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; SEISMIC WAVES;

EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTIES; ESTIMATING METHOD; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; STATIC PUSHOVER ANALYSIS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

IDAS;

EID: 77954509926     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.965     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. FEMA-350. Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-frame Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC, 2000.
2. Cornell C, Jalayer F, Hamburger R, Foutch D. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128(4):526-533.
3. Baker J, Cornell C. Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation. Structural Safety 2008; 30(3):236-253.
4. Lupoi G, Lupoi A, Pinto P. Seismic risk assessment of RC structures with the '2000 SAC/FEMA' method. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2002; 6(4):499-512.
5. Krawinkler H, Zareian F, Medina R, Ibarra L. Decision support for conceptual performance-based design. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(1):115-133.
6. Pinto P, Giannini R, Franchin P. Seismic Reliability Analysis of Structures. IUSS Press: Pavia-Italy, 2004.
7. Melchers R. Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction. Wiley: New York, 2002.
8. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(3):491-514.
9. Dolsek M. Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modeling uncertainties. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008; DOI: 10.1002/eqe.869.
10. Liel A, Haselton C, Deierlein G, Baker J. Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings. Structural Safety 2009; 31(2):197-211.
11. Vamvatsikos D, Fragiadakis M. Incremental Dynamic Analysis for seismic performance uncertainty estimation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2009; DOI: 10.1002/eqe.935.
12. Yun SY, Hamburger R, Cornell C, Foutch D. Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128(4):534-545.
13. FEMA-356. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC, 2000.
14. FEMA-440. Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC, 2005.
15. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C. Direct estimation of the seismic demand sand capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(9):1097-1117.
16. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C. Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multidegree-of-freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approximation. Journal of Structural Engineering 2005; 131(4):589-599.
17. McKenna F, Fenves G. The OpenSees Command Language Manual (1.2. edn), 2001.
18. Ibarra L, Medina R, Krawinkler H. Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34(12):1489-1511.
19. Luco N, Cornell C. Effects of connection fractures on SMRF seismic drift demands. Journal of Structural Engineering 2000; 126(1):127-136.
20. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C. Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20(2):523-553.
21. Vamvatsikos D. SPO2IDA software for short, moderate and long periods, 2002. Available from: http://blume.stanford.edu/pdffiles/Tech%20Reports/TR151 spo2ida-allt.xls [January 2007].
22. Jalayer F. Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: implementing non-linear dynamic assessments. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2003. Available from: http://www.stanford.edu/group/rms/Thesis/FatemehJalayer.pdf [October 2008].
23. Rosenblueth E. Point estimates for probability. Applied Mathematical Modelling 1981; 5:329-335.
24. McKay M, Conover W, Beckman R. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 1979; 21(2):239-245.
25. Iman R, Conover W. A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Communication in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation 1982; 11(3):311-1334.
26. Iman R. Latin hypercube sampling. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. Wiley: New York, 1999. DOI: 10.1002/0471667196.ess1084.pub2.
27. Ching J, Porter K, Beck J. Propagating uncertainties for loss estimation in performance-based earthquake engineering using moment matching. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 2009; 5(3):245-262.
28. Cleveland WS. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1979; 74:829-836.