Alternative arguments and directions for studying performance measurement

Total Quality Management and Business Excellence

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 409-421

  Elg, Mattias ^a   Kollberg, Beata ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Design; Implementation; Management; Performance measurement systems; Performance measures; Research method; Usage

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954502773     PISSN: 14783363     EISSN: 14783371     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14783360902781899     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology. New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
2. Bititci, U.S., Carrie, A.S., & McDevitt, L. (1997). Integrated performance measurement systems: An audit and development guide. The TQM Magazine, 9(1), 46-53.
3. Bititci, U.S., Nudurupati, S.S., Turner, T.J., & Creighton, S. (2002). Web enabled performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(11), 1273-1287.
4. Bititci, U.S., Turner, T., & Begemann, C. (2000). Dynamics of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(6), 692-704.
5. Blomgren, M., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2003). Ledning på distans: Att skapa kunskap för politisk styrning av hälso-och sjukvård. Stockholm: Landstingsförbundet.
6. Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., & Platts, K. (2000). Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(7), 754-771.
7. Bourne, M., Neely, A., Platts, K., & Mills, J. (2002). The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(2), 1288-1310.
8. Cohen, M.D., March, J.D., & Olsen, J.P. (1972). A garbage can theory of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1-25.
9. Elg, M. (2001). Performance measures and managerial work: A modified behavior setting approach to the study of usage of performance measures in managerial meetings. Quality and humansystems engineering (Doctoral thesis, Linköping University, Sweden).
10. Fishman, D.B. (1999). The case for pragmatic psychology. New York: New York University Press.
11. Forsberg, T. (1998). Process orientation and measurements. Division of Quality Technology and Management (Licentiate of engineering thesis, Linköping University, Sweden).
12. Johanson, U., Mårtensson, M., & Skoog, M. (2001). Measuring to understand intangible performance drivers. European Accounting Review, 10(3), 1-31.
13. Julnes, P. de L., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693-708.
14. Juran, J.M. (1989). Juran on leadership for quality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Kald, M., & Nilsson, F. (2000). Performance measurement at Nordic companies. European Management Journal, 18(1), 113-127.
16. Kanji, G.K. (2000). Measuring KANJI’s Business Excellence Index. The 44th EOQ Congress, Budapest, Vol. 2, pp. 163-170.
17. Kanji, G.K. (2002). Measuring business excellence. Routledge Advances in Management and Business Studies. London: Routledge.
18. Kanji, G.K., & Lan, W.Y. (2003). Business excellence and banking. Leeds: Wisdom House Publication Ltd.
19. Kanji, G.K., & Liu, C.K. (2003). Business excellence in the hotel industry. Leeds: Wisdom House Publication Ltd.
20. Kanji, G.K., & Sá, P.M. (2002). Kanji’s business scorecard. Total Quality Management, 13(1), 13-27.
21. Kanji, G.K., & Sá, P.M. (2003). Sustaining health care excellence through performance measurement. Total Quality Management, 14(3), 269-289.
22. Kanji, G.K., & Sá, P.M. (2006). Performance measurement: Path to business excellence. Leeds: Wisdom House Publication Ltd.
23. Kanji, G.K., & Tambi, A.M. (2002). Business excellence in higher education. Chichester: Kingsham Press.
24. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1992). The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, (January-February), 71-79.
25. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1996a). Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management Review, 39, 53-79.
26. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1996b). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
27. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (2001). The strategy-focused organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
28. Kennerley, M., & Neely, A. (2002). A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(11), 1222-1245.
29. Kimberly, J. (1981). Managerial innovation. In P. Nystrom & W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design, Vol. 1: Adapting organizations to their environments (pp. 84-104). New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Kollberg, B. (2003). Exploring the use of balanced scorecards in a Swedish health care organization. Kvalitetsteknik: IKP. Linköping University, Sweden.
31. Kollberg, B., Elg, M., & Lindmark, J. (2005). Design and implementation of a performance measurement system in Swedish health care services: A multiple case study of 6 development teams. Quality Management in Health Care, 14(2), 95-111.
32. Liukkonen, P. (2000). Verksamhetsuppföljning med inriktning på personalen, ekonomin och organisationen. Norsborg: Oskar media.
33. Malmi, T. (2001). Balanced scorecards in Finnish companies: A research note. Management Accounting Research, 12, 207-220.
34. McKinnon, S.M., & Bruns, W.J. (1992). The information mosaic. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
35. Meyer, C. (1994). How the right measures help teams excel. Harvard Business Review, (May-June), 95-103.
36. Neely, A., Adams, C., & Kennerley, M. (2002). The performance prism. London: Prentice Hall.
37. Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design-a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), 80-116.
38. Neely, A., Richards, A.H., Mills, J.F., Platts, K.W., & Bourne, M.C.S. (1997). Designing performance measures: A structured approach. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 17(11), 1131-1152.
39. Olve, N.-G., Petri, C.-J., Roy, J., & Roy, S. (2003). Making scorecards actionable: Balancing strategy and control. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
40. Olve, N.-G., Roy, J., & Wetter, M. (1997). Balanced scorecard i svensk praktik. Malmö: Liber ekonomi.
41. Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10, 363-382.
42. Radnor, Z.J., & Lovell, B. (2003). Success factors for implementation of the balanced scorecard in a NHS multi-agency setting. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 16(2), 99-108.
43. Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith.
44. Simons, R. (1995a). Control in an age of empowerment. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 80-88.
45. Simons, R. (1995b). Levers of control. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
46. Södergren, B., & Söderholm, J. (1999). Sifferledning eller kunskapsledarskap? In S.-E. Sjöstrand, J. Sandberg & M. Tyrstrup (Eds.), Osynlig företagsledning (pp. 246-264). Stockholm: Ekonomiska forskningsinstitutet, EFI.
47. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D.H. (1987). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In R. Hogarth& M. Reder (Eds.), Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology (pp. 67-94). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Van de Ven, A., Angle, H.L., & Poole, M.S. (Eds.). (2000). Research on the management of innovations-The Minnesota Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Wheelwright, S.C., & Clark, K.B. (1992). Revolutionizing product development-quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. New York: The Free Press.