Priority setting in practice: Participants opinions on vertical and horizontal priority setting for reallocation

Health Policy

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 245-254

  Waldau, Susanne ^a   Lindholm, Lars ^b   Wiechel, Anna Helena ^a  

^a Vasterbotten County Council   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Health care resource reallocation; Priority setting; Procedural development

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE BASE; LEADERSHIP; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; POLITICS; PRIORITY SETTING; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC OPINION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SWEDEN; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH PRIORITIES; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; STATE MEDICINE; SWEDEN;

EID: 77954457945     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Waldau S. Prioriteringar i Västerbotten - procedur, genomförande och uppföljning. Del 1. (Priority setting in Västerbotten - procedure, performance and follow up. Part 1) National Knowledge Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care's Report 2009:1. Linköping, 2009 (in Swedish).
2. Västerbotten County Council. Att välja och välja bort - hur ska hälso- och sjukvårdens resurser fördelas? Prioriteringsprinciper för förtroendevalda i Västerbottens läns landsting. (To choose and reject - how should health care resources be allocated? Priority setting principles for politicians in Västerbotten County Council). Dnr 474:91. Umeå, 1992 (in Swedish).
3. Västerbotten County Council. Så arbetar vi med prioriteringar. Riktlinjer för hälso- och sjukvården i Västerbottens läns landsting. (This is how we work with priority setting. Guidelines for health care in Västerbotten County Council). Umeå, 2003 (in Swedish).
4. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Regeringens proposition Prioriteringar inom hälso- och sjukvården. (Swedish Government Proposition Priorities in health care). Gov. Prop. 1996/97:60. Stockholm, 1997 (in Swedish).
5. Waldau S. Local prioritisation work in health care-assessment of an implementation process. Health Policy 2007, 81:133-145.
6. Lindström H., Waldau S. Ethically acceptable prioritisation of childless couples and treatment rationing: " accountability for reasonableness" European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology 2008, 139(2):176-186.
7. Carlsson P, Kärvinge C, Broqvist M, Eklund K, Hallin B, Jacobsson C et al. National Model for Transparent Vertical Prioritisation in Swedish Health Care. English translation of National Knowledge Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care's Report 2007:1. ISSN 1650-8475. National Knowledge Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care. Linköping. 2007.
8. Liss P-E. Fördelning, prioritering och ransonering-en begreppsanalys. (Allocation, priority setting and rationing-a concepts analysis). The National Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care's Report 2002:4. Linköping, 2002. pp. I-II (in Swedish).
9. The National Board of Health and Welfare. Prioritering i sjukvården. Beslut och tillämpning. (Prioritisation in Health Care. Decision and implementation.) The National Board of Health and Welfare Report 1999:16. Stockholm, 1999 (in Swedish).
10. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Prioriteringar i vården. Perspektiv för politiker, profession och medborgare. Slutbetänkande från Prioriteringsdelegationen. (Priority setting in health care. Perspectives for politicians, professions and the public. Final report from the National Delegation on Priority Setting.) Swedish Government Official Report 2001:8. Stockholm, 2001 (in Swedish).
11. Swedish National Audit Office. Riktlinjer för prioritering i hälso- och sjukvården. (Guidelines for priority setting in health care.) SNAO report 2004:9. Stockholm, 2004 (in Swedish).
12. The National Knowledge Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care. Resolving Health Care's Difficult Choices. Survey of Priority Setting in Sweden and an Analysis of Principles and Guidelines on Priorities in Health Care. The National Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care's Report 2008:2. Linköping, 2008.
13. Sabik LM, Lie RK. Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries. International Journal of Equity Health 2008; 7:4. http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/4.
14. The National Board of Health and Welfare. Prioriteringar i hälso- och sjukvården. Socialstyrelsens analys och slutsatser utifrån rapporten " Vårdens alltför svåra val" (Priority setting in health care. The NBHW analysis and conclusions based on the report " The too hard choices in health care" ). Stockholm. 2007. ISBN 978-91-85483-31-0. Published at , May 2007 (in Swedish). http://www.sos.se/.
15. Klein R, Williams A. Setting priorities: what is holding us back-inadequate information or inadequate institutions? In: Coulter A, Ham C, editors. The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing. Buckingham Philadelphia: Open University Press; 2001. p. 15-26.
16. Kamper Jörgensen F. Extern utvärdering av Prioriteringscentrum. (External evaluation of The National Knowledge Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care). The National Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care. Linköping. 2004. (in Swedish). http://e.lio.se/prioriteringscentrum.
17. Greenhalgh T., Robert G., MacFarlane F., Bate P., Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly 2004, 82(4):581-629.
18. The National Board of Health and Welfare. Nationella riktlinjer för strokevård 2009. (National Guidelines for Stroke Care 2009). Stockholm, 2009. (in Swedish). http://www.sos.se/.
19. The Northern County Councils Regional Federation. Synpunkter på Socialstyrelsens Nationella riktlinjer för bröst-, kolorektal- och prostatacancersjukvård 2006. Preliminär version. (Comments on the National Board of Health and Welfare National Guidelines for breast-, colorectal- and prostate cancer care 2006. Preliminary version.) Umeå. 2006-08-24 (in Swedish).
20. The Northern County Councils Regional Federation. Synpunkter på den preliminära versionen av Socialstyrelsens Nationella riktlinjer för hjärtsjukvård 2007. (Comments on the preliminary version of the National Guidelines for coronary care 2007.) Umeå. 2007-11-19 (in Swedish).
21. Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness. Establishing a fair process for priority setting is easier than agreeing on principles. BMJ 2000, 321:1300-1301.
22. Swedish National Audit Office. Att påverka utan att styra. Statens informativa insatser inom hälso- och sjukvårdsområdet. (To influence without managing. National informative actions in health care.) SNAO report 2002:4. Stockholm, 2002 (in Swedish).
23. Calltorp J, Johansson A, Maathz G. Kunskapsbaserad ledning, styrning och utveckling inom hälso- och sjukvården. Slutrapport. (Knowledge based management and development in health care. Final report). Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting. (The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions.) Stockholm, 2006. (in Swedish).
24. Waldau S. Orienteringshjälp för ledare. Kunskapstillväxt i ett snårigt vårdlandskap. (Orientation guide for managers. Knowledge growth in a messy landscape of care). Västerbotten County Council. Umeå. 2007. ISBN 978-91-633-0422-1 (in Swedish).
25. Olson U-J. Mot en effektivare kunskapsstyrning - Kartläggning och analys av nationellt och regionalt stöd för en evidensbaserad praktik i hälso- och sjukvården. (Towards more efficient knowledge management). National Board of Health and Welfare and The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. Stockholm. 2009 (in Swedish).
26. Klein R. Dimensions of rationing: Who should do what?. BMJ 1993, 307:309-311.
27. Argyris C., Putnam R., McLain Smith D. Action science. concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention 1985, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
28. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Research in Nursing & Health 2000, 23:334-340.
29. Kouzes J., Mico P.R. Domain theory: an introduction to organizational behavior in human service organizations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1979, 15:449-469.
30. Vrangbaek K. New Public Management i sygehusfeltet-udformning og konsekvenser. (New public management in the hospital field-shaping and consequences.) In Zeuthen Bentsen E, editor. Når styringsambitioner möder praksis. (Management ambitions meeting practice). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press; 1999. Chapter 2 (in Danish).
31. Melander P. Økonomistyring og organisatorisk skizofreni-om fattige sprog, løse koblinger og onde cirkler. (Economic management and organizational schizophrenia-about poor language, loose couplings and vicious circles.) In Zeuthen Bentsen E, editor. Når styringsambitioner möder praksis. (Management ambitions meeting practice). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press; 1999. Chapter 11 (in Danish).
32. Smith R. Why are doctors so unhappy?. BMJ 2001, 322:1073-1074.
33. Edwards N., Kornacki M.J., Silversin J. Unhappy doctors: what are the causes and what can be done?. BMJ 2002, 324:835-838.