Ethically acceptable prioritisation of childless couples and treatment rationing: "Accountability for reasonableness"

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 139, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 176-186

  Lindström, Håkan ^a   Waldau, Susanne ^b,c  

^a Skelleftea Hospital   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c Vasterbotten County Council   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Accountability for reasonableness; Health priorities; In vitro fertilisation; Rationing; Structured quality improvement; Total quality management

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILDLESSNESS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ETHICS; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN DIGNITY; MALE INFERTILITY; OCCUPATION; ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE; POLITICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 47849085536     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Swedish Government proposition 1996/97:60. Priorities in health care [in Swedish].
2. The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Priorities in health care. Ethics, economy, implementation. Final report by The Swedish Parliamentary Priorities Commission. Swedish Government Official Reports SOU 1995:5. Fritzes, Stockholm; 1995.
3. For explicit and updated reasoning, please see The National Board of Health and Welfare. Nationella riktlinjer för bröst-, kolorektal- och prostatacancer sjukvård 2006. Beslutsstöd för prioriteringar. Preliminär version. [National guidelines for treatment of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer 2006. Support for decision making on prioritisation. Preliminary version]; 2006. p. 37 [in Swedish].
4. National Board of Health and Welfare. National registry of quality in IVF treatment; 2007.
5. Västerbotten County Council. Dimensionering, finansiering och subvention av behandling för barnlöshet i Västerbottens läns landsting. [Dimensioning, financing and subsidies for infertility treatment in Västerbotten County Council]. PM 2003-04-21; 2003 [in Swedish].
6. Hull M.G., Fleming C.F., Hughes A.O., and McDermott A. The age-related decline in female fecundity: a quantitative controlled study of implanting capacity and survival of individual embryos after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 65 4 (1996) 783-790
7. Dunson D.B., Colombo B., and Baird D.D. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 17 5 (1999) 1399-1403
8. Landstingsförbundet [Union of County Councils]. Förbättringskunskap - förenklingskunskap. Hur vi arbetar med ständiga förbättringar vid Kvinnokliniken i Skellefteå. Skellefteå sjukvård. [Constant quality improvement work in the Gyn-Obstetrics Unit in Skellefteå]; 2004 [in Swedish].
9. Plsek P.E. Quality improvement methods in clinical medicine. Pediatrics 103 (1999) 203-214
10. Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness. Establishing a fair process for priority setting is easier than agreeing on principles. BMJ 321 (2000) 1300-1301
11. Argyris C., Putnam R., and McLain Smith D. Action science. Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention (1985), Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco
12. Donabedian A. The quality of medical care. Science 200 (1978) 856-864
13. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed?. JAMA 260 (1988) 1743-1748
14. Plsek P.E., and Greenhalgh T. Complexity science: the challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ 323 (2001) 625-628
15. Västra Götaland County Council. Ofrivillig Barnlöshet-Riktlinjer för Utredning och Behandling i Västra Götaland. [Infertility-guidelines for investigation and treatment in Västra Götaland]; 2003 [in Swedish].
16. Peterson S., Backlund I., and Diderichsen F. Sjukdomsbördan i Sverige-en svensk DALY-kalkyl. Appendix 1. [The burden of disease in Sweden-a Swedish DALY-calculation. Appendix 1]. Folkhälsoinstitutet 1998 (1998) 50 [in Swedish]
17. Eden B. Övervikt och fetma minskar kvinnors fertilitet. [Overweight and obesity reduce female fertility]. Läkartidningen 49 100 (2003) 4096-4099 [in Swedish]
18. Tanbo T., Dale P.O., Abyholm T., and Stokke K.T. Follicle-stimulating hormone as a prognostic indicator in clomiphene citrate human menopausal gonadotropin-stimulated cycles for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 4 (1989) 647-650
19. Check J.H., Nazari P., Check M.L., Choe J.K., and Liss J.R. Prognosis following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in patients with elevated day 2 or 3 serum follicle stimulation hormone (FSH) is better in younger vs. older patients. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 29 (2002) 42-52
20. An earlier version of this article, including the same statements, has been read and accepted by the representative in question.
21. Daniels N., and Sabin J. The ethics of accountability in managed care reform. Health Aff 17 5 (1998) 50-64
22. Daniels N., and Sabin J.E. Last chance therapies and managed care. Pluralism, fair procedures, and legitimacy. Hastings Cent Rep 28 2 (1998) 27-41
23. Martin D.K., Giacomini M., and Singer P.A. Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers. Health Policy 61 (2002) 279-290
24. Carlsson P (director of The National Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care). The 3rd national conference on prioritisation, Gothenburg; September 2005 [oral presentation].
25. PrioriteringsCentrum [The National Knowledge Centre for Prioritisation in Health Care]. Vårdens alltför svåra val? Kartläggning av prioriteringsarbete och analys av riksdagens principer och riktlinjer för prioriteringar I hälso- och sjukvården. [The too hard choices in health care? Investigation of priority setting and analysis of the parliament's principles and guidelines for priority setting in health care]. PrioriteringsCentrum Report; March 2007. ISSN 1650-8475.
26. National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW). Prioriteringar I hälso- och sjukvården. Socialstyrelsens analys och slutsatser utifrån rapporten "Vårdens alltför svåra val". [Priority setting in health care. The NBHW analysis and conclusions based on the report "The too hard choices in health care"]; May 2007. ISBN 978-91-85483-31-0. Published at http://www.socialstyrelsen.se.
27. County Council of Östergötland. Medical programs. Horizontal political prioritisation. From words to action. Sub-report; January 2004.
28. Bäckman K, Andersson A, Carlsson P. Öppna prioriteringar i Östergötland Del I. Den politiska beslutsprocessen. [Open priority setting in Östergötland. Part I. The political decision making process]. PrioriteringsCentrum Report 2004:4; 2004 [in Swedish].
29. Bäckman K, Karlsson E, Carlsson P. Öppna prioriteringar i Östergötland. Del III. Uppföljning av de politiska besluten - hur gick det sedan? [Open priority setting in Östergötland. Part III. Follow up on political decisions-what happened next?]. PrioriteringsCentrum Report 2006:3; 2006 [in Swedish].
30. Swedish Government. Innovativa processer. [Innovative processes]. Swedish Government Official Reports 2003:90; 2003 [in Swedish].
31. Calltorp J, Johansson A, Maathz G. Kunskapsbaserad ledning, styrning och utveckling inom hälso- och sjukvården. Slutrapport. [Knowledge based management and development in health care. Final report]. Sveriges kommuner och landsting. [The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR)]; 2006 [in Swedish].
32. Greenhalgh T., Robert G., MacFarlane F., Bate P., and Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 82 4 (2004) 581-629
33. Waldau S. Local prioritisation work in health care - assessment of an implementation process. Health Policy 81 May (2/3) (2007) 133-145