Defining hotspots of characteristic species for multiple taxonomic groups in the Netherlands

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2517-2536

  Schouten, M A ^a   Barendregt, A ^a   Verweij, P A ^a   Kalkman, V J ^b   Kleukers, R M J C ^b   Lenders, H J R ^c   Siebel, H N ^d  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b European Invertebrate Survey The Netherlands/Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d Natuurmonumenten ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Characteristic species; Conservation biogeography; Hotspots of characteristic species; Multiple taxa; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOGEOGRAPHY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONSERVATION PLANNING; HABITAT CONSERVATION; PRIORITIZATION; PROTECTED AREA; SPECIES CONSERVATION; TAXONOMY; TWINSPAN;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 77954457825     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9857-2     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alterra (2001) Het Landelijk grondgebruiksbestand Versie 4 (LGN4). Centrum voor Geo-informatie, Wageningen.
2. Andelman SJ, Fagan WF (2000) Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 5954-5959.
3. Beuk PLTh (ed) (2002) Checklist of the Diptera of the Netherlands. KNNV Uitgeverij, Utrecht.
4. Bio AMF, Alkemade A, Barendregt A et al (1999) Geostatistical interpolation of abiotic site conditions in the Netherlands. A method for reference mapping. RIVM report 408657 003. RIVM, Bilthoven.
5. Carey PD, Preston CD, Hill MO et al (1995) An environmentally defined biogeographical zonation of Scotland designed to reflect species distributions. J Ecol 83: 833-845.
6. Cormont A, Radix J, Segers M (2004) The spatial distribution of biodiversity over the Netherlands: the role of landscape age. Internal research project MSc Natural Resources Management, Utrecht University.
7. Diffendorfer JE, Fleming GM, Duggan JM et al (2007) Developing terrestrial, multi-taxon indices of biological integrity: an example from coastal sage scrub. Biol Conserv 140: 130-141.
8. Dûfrene M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67: 345-366.
9. Faith DP, Carter G, Cassis G et al (2003) Complementarity, biodiversity viability analysis, and policy-based algorithms for conservation. Environ Sci Policy 6: 311-328.
10. Fox NJ, Beckley LE (2005) Priority areas for conservation of Western Australian coastal fishes: a comparison of hotspot, biogeographical and complementarity approaches. Biol Conserv 125: 399-410.
11. Guralnick R, van Cleve J (2005) Strengths and weaknesses of museum and national survey data sets for predicting regional species richness: comparative and combined approaches. Divers Distrib 11: 349-359.
12. Hill MO (1979) TWINSPAN: a Fortran program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table of the individuals and attributes. Cornell University Press, New York.
13. Jepson P, Canney S (2001) Biodiversity hotspots: hot for what? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10: 225-227.
14. Kati V, Devillers P, Dufrêne M et al (2004) Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at a local scale. Conserv Biol 18: 667-675.
15. Kleukers RMJC, van Nieukerken EJB, Odé LPM et al (1997) De sprinkhanen en krekels van Nederland: Orthoptera. Nederlandse Fauna 1. Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, KNNV Uitgeverij & European Invertebrate Survey, Leiden.
16. KNMI (2002) Klimaatatlas van Nederland. Elmar, B. V., Rijswijk.
17. Kwak RGM, van den Berg A (2004) Nieuwe Broedvogeldistricten van Nederland. Alterra report 1006. Alterra, Wageningen.
18. Landis JR, Koch G (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159-174.
19. Maes D, Bonte D (2007) Using distribution patterns of five threatened invertebrates in a highly fragmented dune landscape to develop a multispecies conservation approach. Biol Conserv 133: 490-499.
20. Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243-253.
21. Margules CR, Pressey RL, Williams PH (2002) Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation. J Biosci 27: 309-326.
22. Mertens R, Wermuth H (1960) Die Amphibien und Reptilien Europas. Verlag W. Kramer, Frankfurt am Main.
23. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington.
24. Monserud RA, Leemans R (1992) Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic. Ecol Model 62: 275-293.
25. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 40: 853-858.
26. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Libellenstudie (2002) De Nederlandse libellen: Odonata. Nederlandse Fauna 4. Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, KNNV Uitgeverij and European Invertebrate Survey, Leiden.
27. Oksanen J, Minchin PR (1997) Instability of ordination results under changes in input data order: explanations and remedies. J Veg Sci 8: 447-454.
28. Orme CDL, Davies RG, Burgess M et al (2005) Global hotspot of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436: 1016-1019.
29. Overbeek GJ, Beusen AHW, Boers PCM et al (2002) Plausibiliteitsdocument STONE 2. 0 Globale verkenning van de plausibiliteit van the STONE versie 2. 0 voor de modellering van uit- en afspoeling van N en P. RIVM report 718501001. RIVM, Bilthoven.
30. Palmer MA (1999) The application of biogeographical zonation and biodiversity assessment to the conservation of freshwater habitats in Great Britain. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 9: 179-208.
31. Pawar SS, Birand AC, Ahmed MF et al (2007) Conservation biogeography in north-east India: hierarchical analysis of cross-taxon distributional congruence. Divers Distrib 13: 53-65.
32. Pienkowski MW, Bignal EM, Galbraith CA et al (1996) A simplified classification of land-type zones to assist the integration of biodiversity objectives in land-use policies. Biol Conserv 75: 11-25.
33. Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH et al (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335-337.
34. Reemer M, Renema W, van Steenis W et al (2009) De Nederlandse zweefvliegen (Diptera: Syrphidae). Nederlandse Fauna 8. Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, KNNV Uitgeverij & European Invertebrate Survey, Leiden.
35. Reid WV (1998) Biodiversity hotspots. Trends Ecol Evol 13: 275-280.
36. Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (2002) Does butterfly diversity predict moth diversity? Testing a popular indicator taxon at local scales. Biol Conserv 103: 361-370.
37. Rodrigues ASL, Gaston KJ (2002) Optimisation in reserve selection procedures-why not? Biol Conserv 107: 123-129.
38. Schouten MA, Verweij PA, Barendregt A et al (2007) Nested assemblages of Orthoptera in the Netherlands: the importance of habitat features and life history traits. J Biogeogr 34: 1938-1946.
39. Schouten MA, Verweij PA, Barendregt A et al (2009) Determinants of species richness distribution in the Netherlands across multiple taxonomic groups. Biodivers Conserv 18: 203-217.
40. Siebel HN, During HJ (2006) Beknopte mosflora van Nederland en België. KNNV Uitgeverij, Utrecht.
41. Sjörs H (1965) Forest regions. Acta Phytogeogr Suecica 50: 48-63.
42. Steur GGL, Heijink W (1992) Bodemkaart van Nederland, schaal 1: 50. 000. Stiboka, Wageningen.
43. Tamis WLM, van 't Zelfde M, van der Meijden R et al (2005) Changes in vascular plant biodiversity in the Netherlands in the 20th century explained by their climatic and other environmental characteristics. Clim Chang 72: 37-56.
44. Tchouto MGP, Yemefack M, De Boer WF et al (2006) Biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities in the Campo-Ma'an rain forests, Cameroon. Biodivers Conserv 15: 1219-1252.
45. Thomas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB et al (2004) Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303: 1879-1881.
46. van Hinsbergen A, van Elsbroek MLP, Hendriks AM et al (2001) Knelpuntenanalyse van milieudruk in relatie tot provinciale natuurdoelen. RIVM report 4086663002. RIVM, Bilthoven.
47. Weeda EJ (1990) Over de plantengeografie van Nederland. In: van der Meijden R (ed) Heukels' flora van Nederland. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.
48. Whitehead PJ, Bowman DJMS, Tidemann SC (1992) Biogeographic patterns, environmental correlates and conservation of avifauna in the Northern Territory, Australia. J Biogeogr 19: 151-161.
49. Whittaker RJ, Araújo MB, Jepson P, Ladle RJ, Watson JEM, Willis KJ (2005) Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Divers Distrib 11: 3-23.
50. Wiens JA, Hayward GD, Holthausen RS et al (2008) Using surrogate species and groups for conservation planning and management. Bioscience 58: 241-252.
51. Williams PH, Gaston KJ (1994) Measuring more of biodiversity: can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? Biol Conserv 67: 211-217.
52. Williams P, Faith D, Manne L et al (2006) Complementarity analysis: mapping the performance of surrogates for biodiversity. Biol Conserv 128: 253-264.
53. Witte JPM, van der Meijden R (2000) Mapping ecosystems by means of ecological species groups. Ecol Eng 16: 143-152.
54. Zonneveld JIS (1985) Levend land. De geografie van het Nederlandse landschap. Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht.