The effect of cryopreservation on goat semen characteristics related to sperm freezability

Animal Reproduction Science

Volumn 121, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 115-123

  Dorado, J ^a   Munoz Serrano A ^a   Hidalgo, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Caprine; CASA; Fertility; Freezing; Semen quality

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; FREEZING; GOAT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM PRESERVATION; PROCEDURES; VETERINARY;

ANIMALS; CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; FREEZING; GOATS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; MALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SEMEN PRESERVATION;

CAPRA; CAPRA HIRCUS;

EID: 77954457367     PISSN: 03784320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.04.182     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aboagla E.M., Terada T. Effects of egg yolk during the freezing step of cryopreservation on the viability of goat spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2004, 62:1160-1172.
2. Amann R.P. Can the fertility potential of a seminal sample be predicted accurately?. J. Androl. 1989, 10:89-98.
3. +2 flux in bovine spermatozoa. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1994, 74:53-58.
4. Cabrera F., González F., Batista M., Calero P., Medrano A., Gracia A. The effect of removal of seminal plasma, egg yolk level and season on sperm freezability of Canary Buck (Capra hircus). Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2005, 40:191-195.
5. Chandler J.E., Painter C.L., Adkinson R.W., Memon M.A., Hoyt P.G. Semen quality characteristics of dairy goats. J. Dairy Sci. 1988, 71:1638-1646.
6. den Daas J.H.G., de Jong G., Lansbergen L.M.T.E., van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw A.M. The relationship between the number of spermatozoa inseminated and the reproductive efficiency of individual bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81:1714-1723.
7. Dorado J., Hidalgo M., Muñoz A., Rodríguez I. Assessment of goat semen freezability according to the spermatozoa characteristics from fresh and frozen samples. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 112:150-157.
8. Dorado J., Rodriguez I., Hidalgo M. Cryopreservation of goat spermatozoa: comparison of two freezing extenders based on post-thaw sperm quality and fertility rates after artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2007, 68:168-177.
9. Farrell P.B., Foote R.H., Simkin M.E., Clegg E.D., Wall R.J. Relationship of semen quality, number of sperm inseminated, and fertility in rabbits. J. Androl. 1993, 14:464-471.
10. Farrell P.B., Presicce G.A., Brockett C.C., Foote R.H. Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility. Theriogenology 1998, 49:871-879.
11. Gacitua H., Arav A. Successful pregnancies with directional freezing of large volume buck semen. Theriogenology 2005, 63:931-938.
12. Garde J.J., Soler A.J., Cassinello J., Crespo C., Malo A.F., Espeso G., Gomendio M., Roldan E.R.S. Sperm cryopreservation in three species of endangered gazelles (Gazella cuvieri, G. dama mhorr, and G. dorcas neglecta). Biol. Reprod. 2003, 69:602-611.
13. Gil J., Söderquist L., Rodriguez-Martinez H. Influence of centrifugation and different extenders on post-thaw sperm quality of ram semen. Theriogenology 2000, 54:93-108.
14. Gil M.A., Roca J., Cremades T., Hernández M., Vázquez J.M., Rodríguez-Martínez H., Martínez E.A. Does multivariate analysis of post-thaw sperm characteristics accurately estimate in vitro fertility of boar individual ejaculates?. Theriogenology 2005, 64:305-316.
15. Gravance C.G., Champion Z.J., Casey P.J. Computer-assisted sperm head morphometry analysis (ASMA) of cryopreserved ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology 1998, 49:1219-1230.
16. Gravance C.G., White C., Robertson K.R., Champion Z.J., Casey P.J. The effects of cryopreservation on the morphometric dimensions of caprine sperm heads. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1997, 49:37-43.
17. Hidalgo M., Rodríguez I., Dorado J.M. The effect of cryopreservation on sperm head morphometry in Florida male goat related to sperm freezability. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2007, 100:61-72.
18. Holt C., Holt W.V., Moore H.D.M., Reed H.C.B., Curnock R.M. Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials. J. Androl. 1997, 18:312-323.
19. Holt W.V. Fundamental aspects of sperm cryobiology: the importance of species and individual differences. Theriogenology 2000, 53:47-58.
20. Holt W.V., Watson P.F., Curry M., Holt C. Reproducibility of computer-aided semen analysis: comparison of five different systems used in a practical workshop. Fertil. Steril. 1994, 62:1277-1282.
21. Leboeuf B., Restall B., Salamon S. Production and storage of goat semen for artificial insemination. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 62:113-141.
22. Lindsay G., Evans G., Maxwell W.M.C. Flow cytometric evaluation of sperm parameters in relation to fertility potential. Theriogenology 2005, 63:445-457.
23. MacLeod I.C., Irvine D.S. The predictive value of computer-assisted semen analysis in the context f a donor insemination programme. Hum. Reprod. 1995, 10:580-586.
24. Martinez-Pastor F., Garcia-Macias V., Alvarez M., Herrez P., Anel L., De Paz P. Sperm subpopulations in Iberian red deer epididymal sperm and their changes through the cryopreservation process. Biol. Reprod. 2005, 72:316-327.
25. Moore H.D.M., Akhondi M.A. Fertilizing capacity of rat spermatozoa is correlated with decline in straight-line velocity measured by continuous computer-aided sperm analysis: epididymal rat spermatozoa from the proximal cauda have a greater fertilizing capacity in vitro than those from the distal cauda or vas deferens. J. Androl. 1996, 17:50-60.
26. Mortimer S.T., Maxwell W.M.C. Effect of medium on the kinetics of frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa. Reproduction 2004, 127:285-291.
27. Nie G.J., Wenzel J.G., Johnson K.E. Comparison of pregnancy outcome in mares among methods used to evaluate and select spermatozoa for insemination. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2002, 69:211-222.
28. Purdy P.H. A review on goat sperm cryopreservation. Small Rumin. Res. 2006, 63:215-225.
29. Ritar A.J., Ball P.D. The effect of freeze-thawing of goat and sheep semen at a high density of spermatozoa on cell viability and fertility after insemination. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1993, 31:249-262.
30. Salamon S., Maxwell W.M. Storage of ram semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 62:77-111.
31. Sanchez-Partida L.G., Windsor D.P., Eppleston J., Setchell B.P., Maxwell W.M.C. Fertility and its relationship to motility characteristics of spermatozoa in ewes after cervical, transcervical, and intrauterine insemination with frozen-thawed ram semen. J. Androl. 1999, 20:280-288.
32. Shannon P., Vishwanath R. The effect of optimal and suboptimal concentrations on the fertility of fresh and frozen bovine semen and a theoretical model to explain the fertility differences. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1995, 39:1-10.
33. Tardif S., Laforest J.P., Cormier N., Bailey J.L. The importance of porcine sperm parameters on fertility in vivo. Theriogenology 1999, 52:447-459.
34. Thurston L.M., Watson P.F., Holt W.V. Semen cryopreservation: a genetic explanation for species and individual variation?. Cryo Lett. 2002, 23:255-262.
35. Thurston L.M., Watson P.F., Mileham A.J., Holt W.V. Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. J. Androl. 2001, 22:382-394.
36. Verstegen J., Iguer-Ouada M., Onclin K. Computer assisted analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 2002, 57:149-179.
37. Vidament M., Magistrini M., Palmer E., Clement F. Equine artificial insemination in French Nacional Studs. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2000, 6:61-66.
38. Watson P.F. Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 1995, 7:871-891.
39. Watson P.F. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 60-61:481-492.
40. Watson P.F., Holt W.V. Cryobanking the Genetic Resource: wildlife conservation for the future? 2001, Taylor and Francis Inc., London.