Advance planning in sequential pick-and-place tasks

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 508-516

  Hesse, Constanze ^a,b   Deubel, Heiner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOTOR SYSTEM; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954446600     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00097.2010     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ansuini C, Giosa L, Turella L, Altoe G, Castiello U. An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effect on hand shaping. Ex Brain Res 185: 111-119, 2008. (Pubitemid 351170524)
2. Ansuini C, Grigis K, Massaccesi S, Castiello U. Breaking the flow of an action. ExpBrain Res 192: 287-292, 2009.
3. Ansuini C, Santello M, Massaccesi S, Castiello U. Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. J Neurophysiol 95: 2456-2465, 2006.
4. Armbrüster C, Spijkers W. Movement planning in prehension: do intended actions influence the initial reach and grasp movement? Motor Control 10: 311-329, 2006. (Pubitemid 44608281)
5. Baldauf D, Cui H, Andersen RA. The posterior parietal cortex encodes in parallel both goals for double-reach sequences. J Neurosci 28: 10081-10089, 2008.
6. Baldauf D, Deubel H. Attentional selection of multiple goal positions before rapid hand movement sequences: an event-related potential study. J Cogn Neurosci 21: 18-29, 2009.
7. Baldauf D, Wolf M, Deubel H. Deployment of visual attention before sequences of goal-directed hand movements. Vision Res 46: 4355-4374, 2006. (Pubitemid 44646527)
8. Castiello U. Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action. Trends Cogn Sci 3: 264-271, 1999. (Pubitemid 29316413)
9. Chao LL, Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12: 478-484, 2000.
10. Cohen RG, Rosenbaum DA. Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans. Exp Brain Res 157: 486-495, 2004.
11. Cuijpers RH, Smeets JBJ, Brenner E. On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. J Neurophysiol 91: 2598-2606, 2004. (Pubitemid 38649769)
12. Culham JC, Cavanagh P, Kanwisher NG. Attention response functions: characterizing brain areas using fMRI activation during parametric variations of attentional load. Neuron 32: 737-745, 2001. (Pubitemid 33145205)
13. Culham JC, Cavina-Pratesi C, Singhal A. The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: what have we learned from neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia 44: 2668-2684, 2006. (Pubitemid 44511945)
14. Culham JC, Kanwisher NG. Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11: 157-163, 2001. (Pubitemid 32289401)
15. Deubel H, Schneider WX. Attentional selection in sequential manual movements, movements around an obstacle and in grasping. In: Attention in Action, edited by Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ. London, UK: Hove, Psychology Press, 2004, p. 69-91.
16. Fitts PM. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47: 381-391, 1954.
17. Fogassi L, Ferrari PF, Gesierich B, Rozzi S, Chersi F, Rizzolatti G. Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 308: 662-667, 2005. (Pubitemid 40594381)
18. Fowler CA. Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. J Phonetics 8: 113-133, 1980.
19. Gentilucci M, Negrotti A, Gangitano M. Planning an action. Exp Brain Res 115: 116-128, 1997.
20. Grafton ST, Fadiga L, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G. Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 6: 231-236, 1997. (Pubitemid 28018712)
21. Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24: 95-112, 1959.
22. Grèzes J, Tucker M, Armony J, Ellis R, Passingham RE. Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. Eur J Neurosci 17: 2735-2740, 2003. (Pubitemid 36819298)
23. Haggard P. Planning of action sequences. Acta Psychol 99: 201-215, 1998.
24. Hesse C, deGrave DD, Franz VH, Brenner E, Smeets JB. Planning movements well in advance. Cogn Neuropsychol 25: 985-995, 2008.
25. Hesse C, Deubel H. Effects of altered transport paths and intermediate movement goals on human grasp kinematics. Exp Brain Res 201: 73-109, 2010.
26. Jackson SR, Jackson GM, Rosicky J. Are non-relevant objects represented in working-memory? The effect of nontarget objects on reach and grasp kinematics. Exp Brain Res 102: 519-530, 1995.
27. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16: 235-254, 1984.
28. Jeannerod M, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G, Sakata H. Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends Neurosci 18: 314-320, 1995.
29. Johansson RS, Westling G. Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71: 59-71, 1988.
30. Johnson-Frey SH, McCarty ME, Keen R. Reaching beyond spatial perception: effects of intended future actions on visually guided prehension. Visual Cogn 11: 371-399, 2004. (Pubitemid 38344186)
31. Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Jeannerod M, Athenes S, Dugas C. Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can J Psychol 41: 365-378, 1987.
32. Milgram P. A spectacle - mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 19: 449-456, 1987.
33. Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H. Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area aip. J Neurophysiol 83: 2580-2601, 2000. (Pubitemid 30321452)
34. Mushiake H, Strick PL. Pallidal neuron activity during sequential arm movements. J Neurophysiol 74: 2754-2758, 1995. (Pubitemid 26012331)
35. Rand MK, Stelmach GE. Segment interdependency and difficulty in two-stroke sequences. Exp Brain Res 134: 228-236, 2000.
36. Rand MK, Stelmach GE. Effect of orienting the finger opposition space in the control of reach-to-grasp movements. J Mot Behav 37: 65-78, 2005.
37. Rosenbaum DA. Human Motor Control. New York: Academic, 1991.
38. Rosenbaum DA, Meulenbroek RG, Vaughan J. Three approaches to the degrees of freedom problem in reaching. In: Hand and Brain: The Neurophysiology and Psychology of Hand Movements, edited by Wing AM, Haggard P, Flanagan R.San Diego, CA: Academic, 1996, p. 169-185.
39. Rosenbaum DA, Meulenbroek RG, Vaughan J, Jansen C. Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. Psychol Rev 108: 709-734, 2001. (Pubitemid 33604143)
40. Rosenbaum DA, Vaughan J, Barnes HJ, Jorgensen MJ. Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation. J Exp Psychol Learn Memory Cogn. 18: 1058-1073, 1992.
41. Savelsbergh GJ, Steenbergen B, van der Kamp J. The role of fragility information in the guidance of the precision grip. Hum Move Sci 15: 115-127, 1996. (Pubitemid 126161913)
42. Schiegg A, Deubel H, Schneider WX. Attentional selection during preparation of prehension movements. Visual Cogn 10: 409-431, 2003. (Pubitemid 36621928)
43. Sidaway B, Schoenfelder-Zohdi B, Moore B. Programming time in serial tapping responses as a function of pathway constraint. Psychol Res 52: 359-365, 1990.
44. Sternberg S, Monsell S, Knoll RL, Wright CE. The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences; comparison of speech and typewriting. In: Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning, edited by Stelmach GE. New York: Academic, 1978, p. 117-152.
45. Weir PL, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Cargoe SL. Is object texture a constraint on human prehension: kinematic evidence. J Mot Behav 23: 205-210, 1991a.
46. Weir PL, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Cargoe SL, Fraser MB. The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension. J Mot Beh 23: 192-204, 1991b.