Movement planning in prehension: Do intended actions influence the initial reach and grasp movement?

Motor Control

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 311-329

  Armbrüster, Claudia ^a   Spijkers, Will ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

After grasp movement; Movement kinematics; Moves through; Serial task; Task requirements

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECELERATION; FEMALE; HAND GRIP; HAND MOVEMENT; HANDEDNESS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; LIFTING EFFORT; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PSYCHOMOTOR ACTIVITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 33750261426     PISSN: 10871640     EISSN: 15432696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/mcj.10.4.311     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Atkeson, C.G. & Hollerbach, J.M. (1985). Kinematics features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 2318-2330.
2. Cohen, R.G. & Rosenbaum, A. (2004). Where grasps are made reveal how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486-495.
3. Cutkosky, M.R. & Howe, R.D. (1990). Human grasp choice and robotic grasp analysis. In S.T. Venkataraman & T. Iberall (Eds.), Dextrous robot hands. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Dubrowski, A., Bock, O., Carnahan, H., & Jüngling, S. (2002). The coordination of hand transport and grasp formation during single- and double-perturbed human prehension movements. Experimental Brain Research, 145, 365-371.
5. Flash, T. & Hogan, N. (1985). The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 1688-1703.
6. Fleming, J., Klatzky, R.L. & Behrmann, M. (2002). Time course of planning for object and action parameters in visually guided manipulation. Visual Cognition, 9, 502-527.
7. Gangitano, M., Daprati, E., & Gentilucci, M. (1998). Visual distractors differentially interfere with the reaching and grasping components of prehension movements. Experimental Brain Research, 122, 441-452.
8. Gentilucci, M., Castiello, U., Corradini, M.L., Scarpa, M., Umiltà, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1991). Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements. Neuropsychologia, 29, 361-378.
9. Hewlett, N. & Hardcastle, W.J. (Eds.) (2000). Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Jeannerod, M. (1988). The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Keele, S.W. (1981). Behavioral analysis of motor control. In V.B. Brooks (Ed.), Handbook of physiology. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.
12. MacKenzie, C.L. & Iberall, T. (1994). The Grasping Hand. In G.E. Stelmach and P.A. Vroon (Eds.), Advances in Psychology. North-Holland. Amsterdam.
13. Marteniuk, R.G., MacKenzie, C.L., Jeannerod, M., Athenes, S., & Dugas, C. (1987). Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 365-378.
14. Neuwirth, W. (2002). Die Motorische Leistungsserie - MLS. Handanweisung. Mödling: Dr. G. Schuhfried.
15. Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
16. Paulignan, Y, Frak, V.G., Toni, I. & Jeannerod, M. (1997). Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements. Experimental Brain Research, 114, 226-234.
17. Rosenbaum, D.A. (1991). Human Motor Control. San Diego: Academic Press.
18. Rosenbaum, D.A. & Jorgenson, M.J. (1992). Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control. Human Movement Science, 11, 61-69.
19. Schmidt, R.A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
20. Short, M.W. & Cauraugh, J.H. (1997). Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: End-state comfort and point-of-change effects. Acta Psychologica, 96, 133-147.
21. Wing, A.M., Turton, A. & Fraser, C. (1986). Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 245-260.