Assessing the level of agreement between the self- and interview- administered Child-OIDP

Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 340-347

  Rosel, Eva ^a   Tsakos, Georgios ^b   Bernabé, Eduardo ^b   Sheiham, Aubrey ^b   Bravo, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

child; oral health; quality of life; random allocation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; EATING; EMOTION; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HEALTH; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; LEARNING; MALE; MOUTH HYGIENE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CONCEPT; SELF EVALUATION; SLEEP; SOCIAL CLASS; SPAIN; SPEECH;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; DENTAL CARE; EATING; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LEARNING; MALE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ORAL HEALTH; ORAL HYGIENE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF CONCEPT; SLEEP; SMILING; SOCIAL CLASS; SPAIN; SPEECH;

EID: 77954443188     PISSN: 03015661     EISSN: 16000528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00533.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. Developing and evaluating an oral health-related quality of life index for children; the CHILD-OIDP. Community Dent Health 2004 21 : 161 169.
2. Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health (Oxf) 2005 27 : 281 291.
3. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use.
4. Robinson PG, Gibson B, Khan FA, Birnbaum W. A comparison of OHIP 14 and OIDP as interviews and questionnaires. Community Dent Health 2001 18 : 144 149.
5. Robinson PG, Gibson B, Khan FA, Birnbaum W. Validity of two oral health-related quality of life measures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003 31 : 90 9.
6. Tsakos G, Bernabé E, O'Brien K, Sheiham A, de Oliveira C. Comparison of the self-administered and interviewer-administered modes of the Child-OIDP. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008 6 : 40.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat 2007 17 : 571 582.
8. McColl E, Eccles MP, Rousseau NS, Steen IN, Parkin DW, Grimshaw JM. From the generic to the condition-specific? Instrument order effects in Quality of Life Assessment. Med Care 2003 41 : 777 790.
9. Cheung YB, Wong LC, Tay MH, Toh CK, Koo WH, Epstein R et al. Order effect in the assessment of quality of life in cancer patients. Qual Life Res 2004 13 : 1217 1223.
10. Cheung YB, Lim C, Goh C, Thumboo J, Wee J. Order effects: a randomised study of three major cancer-specific quality of life instruments. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005 3 : 37.
11. Childs AL, The Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group. Effect of order of administration of health-related quality of life interview instruments on responses. Qual Life Res 2005 14 : 493 500.
12. Jensen PS, Watanabe HK, Richters JE. Who's up first? Testing for order effects in structured interviews using a counterbalanced experimental design. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1999 27 : 436 439.
13. Lucas CP. The order effect: reflections on the validity of multiple test presentations. Psychol Med 1992 22 : 197 202.
14. Cheung YB, Goh C, Thumboo J, Khoo KS, Wee J. Quality of life scores differed according to mode of administration in a review of three major oncology questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2006 59 : 185 191.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 1 : 307 310.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999 8 : 135 160.
17. Hebert JR, Miller DR. The inappropriateness of conventional use of the correlation coefficient in assessing validity and reliability of dietary assessment methods. Eur J Epidemiol 1991 7 : 339 343.
18. Schmidt ME, Steindorf K. Statistical methods for the validation of questionnaires - discrepancy between theory and practice. Methods Inf Med 2006 45 : 409 413.
19. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine - the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983 32 : 307 317.
20. McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1996 1 : 30 46.
21. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. Methods of constructing health measures. Measuring functioning and well-being. In : Stewart AL, Ware JE editors. The medical outcomes study approach.
22. Locker D, Jokovic A, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Family impact of child oral and oro-facial conditions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002 30 : 438 448.
23. Grupo de trabajo de la Sociedad Española de Epidemiología y de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria. Una propuesta de medida de la clase social. Aten Primaria 2000 25 : 350 363.
24. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. The prevalence and severity of oral impacts on daily performances in Thai primary school children. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004 2 : 57.
25. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993 46 : 1417 1432.
26. Acquadro C, Conway K, Giroudet C, Mear I. Linguistic validation manual for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments.
27. Cortés-Martinicorena FJ, Bravo-Pérez M, Artázcoz-Osés J, Tsakos G, Rosel-Gallardo E. Estudio sobre la salud dental de los niños y adolescentes de Navarra (4 edición). Necesidades normativas, percibidas y calidad de vida en relación a su salud oral.
28. Cortés-Martinicorena FJ, Rosel-Gallardo E, Artázcoz- Osés J, Bravo M, Tsakos G. Adaptation and validation for Spain of the Child-Oral Impact on Daily Performance (C-OIDP) for use with adolescents. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010 15 : e106 11.
29. Vach W. The dependence of Cohen's kappa on the prevalence does not matter. J Clin Epidemiol 2005 58 : 655 661.
30. García M, Rohlfs I, Vila J, Sala J, Pena A, Masiá R et al. Comparison between telephone and self-administration of Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36). Gac Sanit 2005 19 : 433 439.
31. Lyons RA, Wareham K, Lucas M, Price D, Williams J, Hutchings HA. SF-36 scores vary by method of administration: implications for study design. J Public Health Med 1999 21 : 41 5.
32. Wu AW, Jacobson DL, Berzon RA, Revicki DA, Van der Host C, Fichtenbaum CJ. The effect of mode of administration on medical outcomes study ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS. Qual Life Res 1997 6 : 3 10.
33. Weinberger M, Oddone EZ, Samsa GP, Landsman PB. Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration? J Clin Epidemiol 1996 49 : 135 140.
34. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Juniper E, Griffith L, McIlroy W, Willan A et al. Interviewer versus self-administered questionnaires in developing a disease-specific, health-related quality of life instrument for asthma. J Clin Epidemiol 1993 46 : 529 534.
35. McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care 1994 32 : 551 567.
36. Slade GD, Reisine ST. The child oral health impact profile: current status and future directions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007 35 (Suppl. 1 50 3.