Pitfalls of using administrative data for research

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1506-1508

  Lieberman, David ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL;

ALGORITHMS; COLONOSCOPY; CURRENT PROCEDURAL TERMINOLOGY; DATA MINING; DATABASES AS TOPIC; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MASS SCREENING; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS;

EID: 77954427385     PISSN: 01632116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1246-x     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. LC Seeff TB Richards JA Shapiro MR Nadel DL Manninen LS Given FB Dong LD Winges MT McKenna 2004 How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity Gastroenterology 127 1670 1677 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.051 15578503 (Pubitemid 39575845)
2. D Lieberman M Nadel R Smith W Atkin S Duggirala R Fletcher S Glick CD Johnson TR Levin J Pope M Potter D Ransohoff D Rex R Schoen P Schroy S Winawer 2007 Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system (CO-RADS): report of the quality assurance task group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable Gastrointest Endosc 65 757 766 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.055 17466195 (Pubitemid 46629071)
3. NL Keating MB Landrum BE Landon, et al. 2003 Measuring the quality of diabetes care using administrative data: is there bias? Health Serv Res 38 1529 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00191.x 14727786
4. DA Lieberman DO Faigel J Logan N Mattek J Holub G Eisen C Morris R Smith M Nadel 2009 Assessment of colonoscopy quality: results from a multi-center consortium Gastrointest Endosc 69 645 653 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.034 19251005
5. Fisher DA, Grubber JM, Castor JM, Coffman CJ. Ascertainment of colonoscopy indication using administrative data. Dig Dis Sci. 2010. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1200-y.
6. RE Schoen PF Pinsky JL Weissfeld LA Yokochi DJ Reding RB Hayes T Church S Yurgalevich VP Doria-Rose T Hickey T Riley CD Berg 2010 Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice Gastroenterology 138 73 81 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.062 19818779
7. SJ Heitman PE Ronksley RJ Hilsden BJ Manns A Rostom BR Hemmelgarn 2009 Prevalence of adenomas and colorectal cancer in average risk individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis Clin Gastroenterol Hepat 7 1272 1278 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.032
8. HB El-Serag L Petersen H Hampel P Richardson G Cooper 2006 The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs Arch Intern Med 166 2202 2208 10.1001/archinte.166.20.2202 17101937 (Pubitemid 44748766)
9. NN Baxter MA Goldwasser LF Paszat R Saskin DR Urback L Rabeneck 2009 Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer: a population-based, case-control study Ann Intern Med 150 1 8 19075198
10. DK Rex JH Bond S Winawer TR Levin RW Burt DA Johnson LM Kirk S Litlin DA Lieberman JD Waye J Church JB Marshal RH Riddell 2002 Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer Am J Gastroenterol 97 1296 1308 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05812.x 12094842 (Pubitemid 34664769)