Investigation on overall charged behavior of polyamide nanofiltration membranes by electrokinetic method

Desalination and Water Treatment

Volumn 12, Issue 1-3, 2009, Pages 284-291

  Ma, Zhun ^a   Wang, Meng ^a   Wang, Duo ^a   Gao, Congjie ^a  

^a OCEAN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

Charge densities; Electrokinetic method; Polyamide nanofiltration membrane; Specific adsorption

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954419236     PISSN: 19443994     EISSN: 19443986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2009.916     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. A.E. Childress and M. Elimelech, Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 119 (1996) 253-268.
2. S. Bandini, Modelling the mechanism of charge formation in NF membranes: Theory and application, J. Membr. Sci., 264 (2005) 75.
3. S.A. Avlonitis, D.A. Avlonitis, S. Skourtis and D. Vlachos, An experimental and modeling study of nanofiltration processes for mixed electrolyte solutions, Desal. Wat. Treat., 7 (2009) 25-34.
4. A. Escoda, B. Lakard, A. Szymczyk and P. Fievet, Characterization of an ultrafiltration membrane modified by sorption of branched polyethyleneimine, Desal. Wat. Treat., 1 (2009) 186-193.
5. M.D. Afonso, G. Hagmeyer and R. Gimbel, Streaming potential measurements to assess the variation of nanofiltration membranes surface charge with the concentration of salt solutions, Separ. Purif. Technol., 22 (2001) 529-541.
6. J.M.M. Peeters, M.H.V. Mulder and H. Strathmanns, Streaming potential measurements as a characterization method for nanofiltration membranes, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 150 (1999) 247-259.
7. M.S. Hall, V.M. Starov and D.R. Lloyd, Reverse osmosis of multicomponent electrolyte Solutions. Part I. Theoretical development, J. Membr. Sci., 128 (1997) 23-37.
8. M.J. Ariza and J. Benavente, Streaming potential along the surface of polysulfone membranes: a comparative study between two different experimental systems and determination of electrokinetic and adsorption parameters, J. Membr. Sci., 190 (2001) 119-132.
9. C. Lettmann, D.M. Kel and E. Staude, Permeation and tangential flow streaming potential measurements for electrokinetic characterization of track-etched microfiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 159 (1999) 243-251.
10. I.H. Huisman, P. Prádanos and A. Hernández, Electrokinetic characterisation of ultrafiltration membranes by streaming potential, electroviscous effect, and salt retention, J. Membr. Sci., 178 (2000) 55-64.
11. P. Fievet and M. Sbaï, Determining the -potential of plane membranes from tangential streaming potential measurements: effect of the membrane body conductance, J. Membr. Sci., 226 (2003) 227-236.
12. A. Szymczyk, A. Pierre, J.C. Reggiani and J. Pagetti, Characterisation of the electrokinetic properties of plane inorganic membranes using streaming potential measurements, J. Membr. Sci., 134 (1997) 59-66.
13. J.X. Mo and S.M. Liu, Theory, experimental method and result of the streaming potential, Technol. Wat. Treat., 17(3) (1991) 153-154.
14. M. Wang, L.G. Wu, J.X. Mo and C.J. Gao, Fabrication of tangential streaming potential measurement system, Chinese J. Anal. Chem., 34(10) (2006) 1507-1510.
15. A. Szymczyk, N. Fatin-Rouge and P. Fievet, Tangential streaming potential as a tool in modeling of ion transport through nanoporous membranes, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 309 (2007) 245-252.
16. L. Ricq and J. Pagetti, Inorganic membrane selectivity to ions in relation with streaming potential, J. Membr. Sci., 155 (1999) 9-18.
17. M. Nyström, M. Lindström and E. Matthiason, Streaming potential as a tool in the characterization of UF membranes, Colloids Surf., 36 (1989) 297-312.
18. A. Szymczyk, P. Fievet, J.C. Reggiani and J. Pagetti, Electrokinetic characterization of mixed alumina-titania-silica MF membranes by streaming potential measurements, Desalination, 115 (1998) 129-134.
19. A.I. Cavaco Morāo, A.M. Brites Alves and M.D. Afonso, Concentration of clavulanic acid broths: influence of surface charge density on NF performance, J. Membr. Sci., 281 (2006) 417-428.
20. M.D. Afonso and M.N. Pinho, Transport of MgSO4, MgCl2, and Na2SO4 across an amphoteric nanofiltration membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 179 (2000) 137-154.
21. J.H. Petropoulos, D.G. Tsimboukis and K. Kouzeli, Nonequipotential volume membrane models: relation between the Glueckauf and equipotential surface models, J. Membr. Sci., 16 (1983) 379-389.
22. W.R. Bowen and H. Mukhtar, Characterisation and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 112 (1996) 263-274.
23. W.R. Bowen and X.W. Cao, Electrokinetic effect in membrane pores and the determination of zeta-potential, J. Membr. Sci., 140 (1998) 267-273.
24. M.D. Afonso and M.N. Pinho, Mass transfer modeling for salt transport in amphoteric nanofiltration membranes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37(10) (1998) 4118-4127.
25. W.R. Bowen, A.M. Mohammad and N. Hilal, Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes-use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy, J. Membr. Sci., 126 (1997) 91-105.