fMRI reveals that involuntary visual deviance processing is resource limited

NeuroImage

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1245-1252

  Yucel, Gunes ^a,d   McCarthy, Gregory ^a,c   Belger, Aysenil ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Frontal cortex; Functional MRI; Load effect; Parietal cortex; Visual cortex; Visual mismatch

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; BEHAVIOR; BLOOD OXYGENATION; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INVOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL DEVIANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; VISUAL CORTEX; VOLITION;

EID: 33947164406     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.050     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bender D.B., and Youakim M. Effect of attentive fixation in macaque thalamus and cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 85 (2001) 219-234
2. Cammann R. Is there a mismatch negativity (MMN) in the visual modality?. Behav. Brain Sci. 13 (1990) 234-235
3. Corbetta M., and Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev., Neurosci. 3 (2002) 201-215
4. Czigler I., Balazs L., and Pato L.G. Visual change detection: event-related potentials are dependent on stimulus location in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 364 (2004) 149-153
5. Gandhi S.P., Heeger D.J., and Boynton G.M. Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96 (1999) 3314-3319
6. Grieve K.L., Acuna C., and Cudeiro J. The primate pulvinar nuclei: vision and action. Trends Neurosci. 23 (2000) 35-39
7. Handy T.C., Soltani M., and Mangun G.R. Perceptual load and visuocortical processing: event-related potentials reveal sensory-level selection. Psychol. Sci. 12 (2001) 213-218
8. Heslenfeld D.J. Visual mismatch negativity. In: Polich J. (Ed). Detection of Change: Event-Related Potential and fMRI Findings (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishing, Boston 41-60
9. Kastner S., and Ungerleider L.G. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23 (2000) 315-341
10. Kastner S., and Ungerleider L.G. The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex. Neuropsychologia 39 (2001) 1263-1276
11. Kastner S., Pinsk M.A., De Weerd P., Desimone R., and Ungerleider L.G. Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 22 (1999) 751-761
12. Kustov A.A., and Robinson D.L. Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements. Nature 384 (1996) 74-77
13. Lavie N. Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9 (2005) 75-82
14. Lavie N., and Tsal Y. Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Percept. Psychophys. 56 (1994) 183-197
15. Lavie N., Hirst A., de Fockert J.W., and Viding E. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 133 (2004) 339-354
16. Logan G.D. Attention demands of visual search. Mem. Cogn. 6 (1978) 446-453
17. Luck S.J., Chelazzi L., Hillyard S.A., and Desimone R. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 77 (1997) 24-42
18. Martinez A., Anllo-Vento L., Sereno M.I., Frank L.R., Buxton R.B., Dubowitz D.J., Wong E.C., Hinrichs H., Heinze H.J., and Hillyard S.A. Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nat. Neurosci. 2 (1999) 364-369
19. Naatanen R. Attention and Brain Function (1992), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
20. Naatanen R., and Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol. Bull. 125 (1999) 826-859
21. O'Connor D.H., Fukui M.M., Pinsk M.A., and Kastner S. Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat. Neurosci. 5 (2002) 1203-1209
22. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
23. Pazo-Alvarez P., Cadaveira F., and Amenedo E. MMN in the visual modality: a review. Biol. Psychol. 63 (2003) 199
24. Pazo-Alvarez P., Amenedo E., and Cadaveira F. Automatic detection of motion direction changes in the human brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19 (2004) 1978-1986
25. Pessoa L., Kastner S., and Ungerleider L.G. Neuroimaging studies of attention: from modulation of sensory processing to top-down control. J. Neurosci. 23 (2003) 3990-3998
26. Pinsk M.A., Doniger G.M., and Kastner S. Push-pull mechanism of selective attention in human extrastriate cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 92 (2004) 622-629
27. Rees G., Frith C.D., and Lavie N. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science 278 (1997) 1616-1619
28. Reynolds J.H., and Chelazzi L. Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27 (2004) 611-647
29. Reynolds J.H., Chelazzi L., and Desimone R. Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. J. Neurosci. 19 (1999) 1736-1753
30. Schwartz S., Vuilleumier P., Hutton C., Maravita A., Dolan R.J., and Driver J. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. Cereb. Cortex 15 (2005) 770-786
31. Sparks D.L. Conceptual issues related to the role of the superior colliculus in the control of gaze. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9 (1999) 698-707
32. Stagg C., Hindley P., Tales A., and Butler S. Visual mismatch negativity: the detection of stimulus change. NeuroReport 15 (2004) 659-663
33. Tales A., Newton P., Troscianko T., and Butler S. Mismatch negativity in the visual modality. NeuroReport 10 (1999) 3363-3367
34. Wickens C., Kramer A., Vanasse L., and Donchin E. Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science 221 (1983) 1080-1082
35. Woodman G.F., Vogel E.K., and Luck S.J. Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychol. Sci. 12 (2001) 219-224
36. Woods D.L., Alho K., and Algazi A. Intermodal selective attention: I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 82 (1992) 341-355
37. Yi D.J., Woodman G.F., Widders D., Marois R., and Chun M.M. Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load. Nat. Neurosci. 7 (2004) 992-996
38. Yucel G., Petty C., McCarthy G., and Belger A. Graded Visual Attention Modulates Brain Responses Evoked By Task-Irrelevant Auditory Pitch Changes. J Cogn Neurosci. 17 (2005) 1819-1828
39. Yucel G., Petty C., McCarthy G., and Belger A. Visual task complexity modulates the brain's response to unattended auditory novelty. NeuroReport 16 (2005) 1031-1036