Jim Bulpitt's Territory and Power in the United Kingdom and Interpreting Political Development: Bringing the State and Temporal Analysis Back In

Government and Opposition

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 318-344

  Bradbury, Jonathan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954358177     PISSN: 0017257X     EISSN: 14777053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2010.01315.x     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. J.G. Bulpitt, Territory and Power in the United Kingdom: An Interpretation, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1983; and reissued edn, Colchester, ECPR Press, 2008.
2. P. John, 'New Introduction', in J. G. Bulpitt, Territory and Power (2008), 1-16.
3. M. Bevir and R.A.W. Rhodes, Interpreting British Governance, London, Routledge, 2003, 77.
4. R.A.W. Rhodes, Beyond Westminster and Whitehall, London, Unwin and Hyman, 1988.
5. J. Bradbury, 'Territory and Power Revisited: Theorising Territorial Politics in the United Kingdom After Devolution', Political Studies, 54: 3 (2006), 559-82.
6. A. Trench (ed.), Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2008.
7. J. Buller, National Statecraft and European Integration, the Conservative Government and the European Union, 1979-1997, London, Cassell, 2000.
8. J. Buller and M. Flinders, 'The Domestic Origins of Depoliticisation in the Area of British Economic Policy', British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7 (2005), 526-43.
9. A. Gamble, 'Theories of British Politics', Political Studies, 38 (1990), 404-20.
10. P. Kerr and S. Kettell, 'In Defence of British Politics: The Past, Present and Future of the Discipline', British Politics, 1: 1 (2006), 3-25.
11. J. Bulpitt, 'The Discipline of the New Democracy: Mrs Thatcher's Domestic Statecraft', Political Studies, 34: 1 (1986), 19-39.
12. Gamble, 'Theories of British Politics', 410.
13. Bevir and Rhodes, Interpreting British Governance, 110-11.
14. Bradbury, 'Territory and Power Revisited'.
15. See P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol (eds), Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985.
16. P. Pierson, Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004.
17. P. Pierson and T. Skocpol (eds), The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2007.
18. T. Skocpol, 'Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research', in Evans, Rueschemeyer and Skocpol, Bringing the State Back In, 3-36.
19. E. Nordlinger, On the Autonomy of the Democratic State, Cambridge, MA, and London, Harvard University Press, 1981.
20. See for example J. Haywood, B. Barry and A. Brown (eds), The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century, 2003.
21. J. A. Hall and G. J. Ikenberry, The State, Milton Keynes, Open University Press, 1989, 1-2.
22. R. Lindley, Autonomy, London, Macmillan, 1986.
23. Nordlinger, On the Autonomy of the Democratic State; M. Olson, The Rise and Decline of Nations, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1982.
24. M. Carnoy, The State and Political Theory, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1984.
25. B. Jessop, 'Recent Theories of the Capitalist State', Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1 (1977), 353-73.
26. T. Bottomore, Elites and Society, Middlesex, Penguin, 1966.
27. P. Dunleavy and B. O'Leary, Theories of the State, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1987.
28. M. Mann, 'The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results', in J. A. Hall (ed.), States in History, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1986, 109-36.
29. P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol, 'On the Road Toward a More Adequate Understanding of the State', in Evans, Rueschemeyer and Skocpol, Bringing the State Back In, 347-66.
30. Mann, 'The Autonomous Power of the State', 111.
31. P. Cammack, 'Bringing the State Back In?', British Journal of Political Science, 19: 2 (1989), 261-90.
32. T. Gurr and D. King, The State and the City, Basingstoke and London, Macmillan, 1987, 1-28.
33. J. Richardson and G. Jordan, Governing Under Pressure: The Policy Process in a Post-Parliamentary Democracy, Oxford, Martin Robertson, 1979.
34. R.A.W. Rhodes, Understanding Governance, Buckingham, Open University Press, 1997.
35. D. Richards and M. Smith, Governance and Public Policy in the UK, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.
36. Bulpitt, Territory and Power (2008), 59-60.
37. Gamble, 'Theories of British Politics', 410.
38. J. Buller, 'A Critical Reappraisal of the Statecraft Interpretation', Public Administration, 77: 4 (1999), 691-712 for a discussion of realism and the statecraft perspective.
39. Bulpitt, Territory and Power (2008), 59, original emphasis.
40. Ibid., 61.
41. Ibid., 181-5 and 197-8.
42. Ibid, 65-8.
43. Ibid., 64.
44. Ibid., 64.
45. Ibid., 56-70.
46. B. Hindess, 'Bringing States Back In', Political Science Review, 4: 2 (2006), 118.
47. Pierson, Politics in Time, 4-7.
48. K. Thelen and S. Steinmo, 'Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics'.
49. S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth, Structuring Politics, Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992, 2.
50. J. Elster, Solomonic Judgments, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989, viii. Note Pierson ultimately sought to unite historical institutionalist and rational choice approaches in the development of the study of temporal mechanisms.
51. Pierson, Politics in Time, 10.
52. Ibid., 10-14.
53. Ibid., 13-14.
54. Ibid., 13.
55. P. Pierson and T. Skocpol, 'American Politics in the Long Run', in Pierson and Skocpol (eds), The Transformation of American Politics, 3.
56. Pierson and Skocpol, 'American Politics in the Long Run', 3-4.
57. Ibid., 4.
58. Pierson, Politics in Time 7-10.
59. F. Scharpf, Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centred Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1997, 29.
60. Bradbury, 'Territory and Power Revisited'.
61. M. Bevir, 'Interpreting Territory and Power', in this issue.
62. Bulpitt, Territory and Power (2008), 61.
63. Ibid., 78-83.
64. Ibid., 81.
65. Ibid., 82.
66. Ibid., 83-6.
67. Ibid., 94.
68. Ibid., 67-8.
69. Ibid., 101-17.
70. Ibid., 98.
71. Ibid., 116-17.
72. Ibid., 99.
73. Ibid., 99.
74. Ibid., 120-39.
75. Ibid., 123.
76. Ibid., 136.
77. D. Kavanagh, Thatcherism and British Politics, 2nd edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1990.
78. D. Kavanagh, 'The Postwar Consensus', Twentieth Century British History, 3: 2 (1992), 175-90.
79. C. Webster, The National Health Service, A Political History, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998.
80. S. Brittan, Steering the Economy, London, Penguin, 1970.
81. A. Ringe and N. Rollings, 'Responding to Relative Decline: The Creation of the National Economic Development Council', Economic History Review, 53: 2 (2000), 331-53.
82. D. Marquand, The Unprincipled Society, New Demands and Old Politics, London, Jonathan Cape, 1988.
83. Bulpitt, Territory and Power (2008), 142-63.
84. Ibid., 168-92.
85. J. Bulpitt, 'Walking Back to Happiness? Conservative Party Governments and Elected Local Authorities in the 1980s', in C. Crouch and D. Marquand (eds), The New Centralism, Oxford, Blackwell, 1989.
86. Bulpitt, Territory and Power (2008), 193-9.
87. M. Smith, 'Re-Centring British Government: Beliefs, Traditions and Dilemmas in Political Science', Political Studies Review, 6 (2008), 143-54.