Population genetic diversity and fitness in multiple environments

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Markert, Jeffrey A ^a,c   Champlin, Denise M ^a   Gutjahr Gobell, Ruth ^a   Grear, Jason S ^a   Kuhn, Anne ^a   McGreevy, Thomas J ^a,b   Roth, Annette ^a   Bagley, Mark J ^a   Nacci, Diane E ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^c U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; CRUSTACEAN; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; ESTUARINE ECOSYSTEM; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; EXTINCTION; FITNESS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; POPULATION SIZE; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; SEAWATER; VULNERABILITY;

AMERICAMYSIS BAHIA; CRUSTACEA;

ALLELE; AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CRUSTACEA; DNA SEQUENCE; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; POPULATION GENETICS;

ALLELES; AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; ANIMALS; CRUSTACEA; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 77954289659     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-205     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Of cats and haruspices: genetic intervention in the Florida panther. Response to Pimm et al. (2006). DS Maehr P Crowley J CJ J LM JL Larkin TS Hoctor LD Harris M HP, Animal Conservation 2006 9 127 132 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2005. 00019.x
2. Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population. R Westemeier J Brawn S Simpson T Esker R Jansen J Walk E Kershner J Bouzat K Paige, Science 1998 282 1695 1698 10.1126/science.282.5394.1695 9831558
3. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. ME Gilpin ME Soule, Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc, Soule ME, 1986
4. Population size: Implications for plant conservation. NC Ellstrand DR Elam, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1993 24 217 242 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001245
5. An investigation of inbreeding depression and purging in captive pedigreed populations. EH Boakes J Wang W Amos, Heredity 2007 98 172 182 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800923 17180167
6. Differences in reproductive success between laboratory and wild-derived golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) as a consequence of inbreeding. P Fritzsche K Neumann K Nasdal R Gattermann, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2006 60 220 226 10.1007/s00265-006-0159-3 (Pubitemid 43846648)
7. Low genetic variation in the heath hen prior to extinction and implications for the conservation of prairie-chicken populations. JA Johnson PO Dunn, Conservation Genetics 2006 7 37 48 10.1007/s10592-005-7856-8
8. Environmental dependency of inbreeding depression: implications for conservation biology. LA Pray JM Schwartz CJ Goodnight L Stevens, Conservation Biology 1993 8 562 568 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08020562.x
9. Inbreeding depression influences lifetime breeding success in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). J Slate LEB Kruuk TC Marshall JM Pemberton TH Clutton-Brock, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 2000 267 1657 1662 10.1098/rspb.2000.1192
10. Genetic and environmental stress, and the persistence of populations. R Bijlsma J Bundgaard AC Boerema WF Van Putten, Environmental Stress, Adapation and Evolution Basel: Birkhauser Verlag, Loeschcke RBaV, 1998
11. Inbreeding and extinction: the effect of environmental stress and lineage. DH Reed DA Briscoe R Frankham, Conservation Genetics 2002 3 301 307 10.1023/A:1019948130263
12. Environmental conditions affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression in survival of Darwin's finches. LF Keller PR Grant BR Grant K Petren, Evolution 2002 56 1229 1239 12144022
13. Genetic diversity-fitness correlation revealed by microsatellite analyses in European alpine marmots (Marmota marmota). A Da Silva G Luikart NG Yoccoz A Cohas D Allaine, Conservation Genetics 2006 7 371 382 10.1007/s10592-005-9048-y (Pubitemid 43873291)
14. Heterosis: revisiting the magic. ZB Lippman D Zamir, Trends in Genetics 2007 23 60 66 10.1016/j.tig.2006.12.006 17188398
15. Neutral locus heterozygosity, inbreeding, and survival in Darwin's ground finches (Geospiza fortis and G. scandens). JA Markert PR Grant BR Grant LF Keller JL Coombs K Petren, Heredity 2004 92 306 15 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800409 14735140
16. Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expecations and empirical data. J Slate P David KG Dodds BA Veenvliet BC Glass TE Broad JC McEwan, Heredity 2004 93 255 265 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800485 15254488
17. Predicting the occurrence of genetic adaptation to dioxinlike compounds in populations of the estuarine fish Fundulus heteroclitus. D Nacci D Champlin L Coiro R McKinney S Jayaraman, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2002 21 1525 1532 12109755
18. Ecological history affects zooplankton community responses to acidification. JM Fischer JL Klug AR Ives TM Frost, Ecology 2001 82 2984 3000 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2984:EHAZCR]2.0.CO;2
19. Low potential for climatic stress adapation in a rainforest Drosophila species. AA Hoffmann RJ Hallas JA Dean M Schiffer, Science 2003 301 100 102 10.1126/science.1084296 12843394
20. Why breeding time has not responded to selection for earlier breeding in a songbird population. P Gienapp E Postma ME Visser, Evolution 2006 60 2381 2388 17236428
21. Influence of genetic variability on population growth: implications for conservation. P Leberg, Journal of Fish Biology 1990 37 Supplement A 193 195 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb05036.x
22. Strategies for population reintroduction: Effects of genetic variability on population growth and size. P Leberg, Conservation Biology 1993 7 194 199 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07010194.x
23. Increased probability of extinction due to decreased genetic effective population size: Experimental populations of Clarkia pulchella. D Newman D Pilson, Evolution 1997 51 354 362 10.2307/2411107
24. Experimental tests of captive breeding for endangered species. EH Bryant VL Backus ME Clark DH Reed, Conservation Biology 1999 13 1487 1496 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98440.x
25. Do population size bottlenecks reduce evolutionary potential. R Frankham K Lees ME Montgomery PR England EH Lowe DA Briscoe, Animal Conservation 1999 2 10.1111/j.1469-1795.1999.tb00071.x
26. Stress and adaptation in conservation genetics. R Frankham, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2005 18 750 755 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00885.x 16033545
27. Reproductive strategies of Tribolium flour beetles. A Ludovic Y Brostaux S Lallemand E Haubruge, Journal of Insect Science 2005 5 33 17119615
28. Age-specific patterns of genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Fecundity and its genetic covariance with age-specific mortality. M Tatar DEL Promislow AA Khazaeli JW Curtsinger, Genetics 1996 143 849 858 8725233
29. A taxonomic guide to the mysids of the South Atlantic. RW Heard DM Knott RA King DM Allen, Book A taxonomic guide to the mysids of the South Atlantic. (Editor ed.eds.) City: U.S. Department of Commerce 2006 37
30. Optimization of environmental factors during the life cycle of Mysidopsis bahia. CL McKenney, EPA Environmental Research Brief 1987 EPA/600/M-87/004 1 6
31. The combined effects of salinity and temperature on various aspects of the reproductive biology of the estuarine mysid, Mysidopsis bahia. CL McKenney, Invertebrate reproduction and development 1996 29 9 18
32. Evaluation of the efficacy of extrapolation population modeling to predict the dynamics of Americamysis bahia populations in the laboratory. A Kuhn WR Munns D Champlin R McKinney M Tagliabue J Serbst T G, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2001 20 213 221 11351411
33. Techniques for the laboratory culture of Mysidopsis species (Crustacea: Mysidae). SM Lussier A Kuhn MJ Chammas J Swewall, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 1988 7 969 977
34. Trophic analysis of an estuarine mangrove community. WE Odum EJ Heald, Bulletin of Marine Science 1972 22 671 738
35. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. P Vos R Hogers M Bleeker M reijans TVd Lee M Hernes A Frijters J Pot J Peleman M Kuiper, Nucleic Acids Research 1995 23 4407 4414 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407 7501463
36. Increased reproduction by Mysids (Mysidopsis bahia) fed with enriched Artemia spp. Nauplii. AH Kuhn DA Bengtson KL Simpson, American Fisheries Society Symposium 1991 9 192 199
37. R Frankham JD Ballou DA Briscoe, Introduction to conservation genetics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004
38. Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. X Vekemans T Beauwens M Lemaire I Roldan-Ruiz, Molecular Ecology 2002 11 131 151 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01415.x (Pubitemid 34108478)
39. Nonequilibrium population structure in forked fungus beetles: extinction, colonization and the genetic variance among populations. MC Whitlock, American Naturalist 1992 139 952 970 10.1086/285368
40. An objective, rapid and reproducible method for scoring AFLP peak-height data that minimizes genotyping error. R Whitlock H Hipperson M Mannarelli RK Butlin T Burke, Molecular Ecology Resources 2008 8 725 735 10.1111/j.1755-0998. 2007.02073.x (Pubitemid 351989527)
41. Analysis of populationgenetic structure with RAPD markers. M Lynch BG Milligan, Molecular Ecology 1994 3 91 99 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1994.tb00109.x 8019690
42. An estimate of the mutational damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. NE Morton JF Crow HJ Muller, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 1956 42 855 863 10.1073/pnas.42.11.855
43. G Keppel TD Wickens, Design and Analysis Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall 4 2004
44. The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. SN Goodman JA Berlin, Annals of Internal Medicine 1994 121 200 206 8017747
45. Effect of migration or inbreeding followed by selection on low-founder-number populations: implications for captive breeding programs. VL Backus EH Bryant CR Hughes LM Meffert, Conservation Biology 1995 9 1216 1224 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9051216.x
46. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. P Armbruster D Reed, Heredity 2005 95 235 242 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800721 16077737
47. The ecology of inbreeding depression. PO Cheptou, Heredity 2006 96 110 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800768 16249800
48. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. LF Keller DM Waller, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2002 17 230 241 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02489-8 (Pubitemid 34270584)
49. The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. DA Tallmon G Luikart RS Waples, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2004 19 489 496
50. The expected degree of heterozygosity in a double-cross hybrid population. DG Pederson, Genetics 1966 53 669 674 17248300
51. R Lande S Engen Saether B-E, Stochastic Population Dynamics in Ecology and Conservation Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003
52. On population growth in a randomly varying evironment. RC Lewontin D Cohen, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 1969 69 1056 1060 10.1073/pnas.62.4.1056