Developmental ability of porcine in vitro matured oocytes at the meiosis II stage after vitrification

Journal of Reproduction and Development

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 356-361

  Ogawa, Buko ^a   Ueno, Satoshi ^a   Nakayama, Naoki ^a   Matsunari, Hitomi ^a   Nakano, Kazuaki ^a   Fujiwara, Tsukasa ^a   Ikezawa, Yuka ^a   Nagashima, Hiroshi ^a  

^a MEIJI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cryopreservation; Delipation; In vitro matured oocytes; Pig; Vitrification

Indexed keywords

PACLITAXEL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CHEMISTRY; CRYOPRESERVATION; CYTOLOGY; CYTOPLASM; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; MEIOSIS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MICROTUBULE; OOCYTE; PHYSIOLOGY; SWINE; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; CRYOPRESERVATION; CYTOPLASM; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EMBRYO CULTURE TECHNIQUES; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; MEIOSIS; MICROTUBULES; OOCYTES; PACLITAXEL; SWINE;

SUIDAE; SUS;

EID: 77954276917     PISSN: 09168818     EISSN: 13484400     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1262/jrd.10-005H     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Glenister PH, Thornton CE. Cryoconservation-archiving for the future. Mamm Genome 2000; 11: 565-571.
2. Dobrinsky JR. Advancements in cryopreservation of domestic animal embryos. Theriogenology 2002; 57: 285-302.
3. Al-Hasani S, Kirsch J, Diedrich K, Blanke S, Van der Ven H, Krebs D. Successful embryo transfer of cryopreserved and in-vitro fertilized rabbit oocytes. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 77-79.
4. Fuku E, Kojima T, Shioya Y, Marcus GJ, Downey BR. In vitro fertilization and development of frozen-thawed bovine oocytes. Cryobiology 1992; 29: 485-492.
5. Maclellan LJ, Carnevale EM, Coutinho da Silva MA, Scoggin CF, Bruemmer JE, Squires EL. Pregnancies from vitrified equine oocytes collected from super-stimulated and non-stimulated mares. Theriogenology 2002; 58: 911-919.
6. Gómez MC, Kagawa N, Pope CE, Kuwayama M, Leibo SP, Dresser BL. In vivo survival of domestic cat oocytes after vitrification, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and transfer to recipients. Reprod Fertil Dev 2008; 20: 118.
7. Chen C. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet 1986; 1: 884-886.
8. Whittingham DG. Fertilization in vitro and development to term of unfertilized mouse oocytes previously stored at -196 C. J Reprod Fertil 1977; 49: 89-94.
9. Nakagata N. Cryopreservation of unfertilized rat oocytes by ultrarapid freezing. Jikken Dobutsu 1992; 41: 443-447 (In Japanese).
10. Zhou GB, Li N. Cryopreservation of porcine oocytes: recent advances. Mol Hum Reprod 2009; 15: 279-285.
11. Nagashima H, Cameron RDA, Kuwayama M, Young M, Beebe L, Blackshaw AW, Nottle MB. Survival of porcine delipated oocytes and embryos after cryopreservation by freezing or vitrification. J Reprod Dev 1999; 45: 167-176.
12. Nagashima H, Kashiwazaki N, Ashman RJ, Grupen CG, Seamark RF, Nottle MB. Removal of cytoplasmic lipid enhances the tolerance of porcine embryos to chilling. Biol Reprod 1994; 51: 618-622.
13. Nagashima H, Kashiwazaki N, Ashman RJ, Grupen CG, Nottle MB. Cryopreservation of porcine embryos. Nature 1995; 374: 416.
14. Chen SU, Lien YR, Chao KH, Ho HN, Yang YS, Lee TY. Effects of cryopreservation on meiotic spindles of oocytes and its dynamics after thawing: clinical implications in oocyte freezing-a review article. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2003; 202: 101-107.
15. Albertini DF, Herman B, Sherline P. In vivo and in vitro studies on the role of HMW-MAPs in taxol-induced microtubule bundling. Eur J Cell Biol 1984; 33: 134-143.
16. Shi WQ, Zhu SE, Zhang D, Wang WH, Tang GL, Hou YP, Tian SJ. Improved development by Taxol pretreatment after vitrification of in vitro matured porcine oocytes. Reproduction 2006; 131: 795-804.
17. Morató R, Izquierdo D, Albarracín JL, Anguita B, Palomo MJ, Jiménez-Macedo AR, Paramio MT, Mogas T. Effects of pre-treating in vitro-matured bovine oocytes with the cytoskeleton stabilizing agent taxol prior to vitrification. Mol Reprod Dev 2008; 75: 191-201.
18. Park SE, Chung HM, Cha KY, Hwang WS, Lee ES, Lim JM. Cryopreservation of ICR mouse oocytes: improved post-thawed preimplantation development after vitrification using Taxol, a cytoskeleton stabilizer. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 1177-1184.
19. Schmidt DW, Nedambale TL, Kim C, Maier DB, Yang XJ, Tian XC. Effect of cytoskeleton stabilizing agents on bovine matured oocytes following vitrification. Fertil Steril 2004; 82 (Suppl 2): S26 (abstract O66).
20. Zhang J, Nedambale TL, Yang M, Li J. Improved development of ovine matured oocyte following solid surface vitrification (SSV): effect of cumulus cells and cytoskeleton stabilizer. Anim Reprod Sci 2009; 110: 46-55.
21. Petters RM, Wells KD. Culture of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 48 (Suppl): 61-73.
22. Funahashi H, Day BN. Effects of the duration of exposure to hormone supplements on cytoplasmic maturation of pig oocytes in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 98: 179-185.
23. Nagashima H, Hiruma K, Saito H, Tomii R, Ueno S, Nakayama N, Matsunari H, Kurome M. Production of live piglets following cryopreservation of embryos derived from in vitro-matured oocytes. Biol Reprod 2007; 76: 900-905.
24. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 300-308.
25. Fujihira T, Nagai H, Fukui Y. Relationship between equilibration times and the presence of cumulus cells, and effect of Taxol treatment for vitrification of in vitro matured porcine oocytes. Cryobiology 2005; 51: 339-343.
26. Rojas C, Palomo MJ, Albarracín JL, Mogas T. Vitrification of immature and in vitro matured pig oocytes: study of distribution of chromosomes, microtubules, and actin microfilaments. Cryobiology 2004; 49: 211-220.
27. Fu XW, Shi WQ, Zhang QJ, Zhao XM, Yan CL, Hou YP, Zhou GB, Fan ZQ, Suo L, Wusiman A, Wang YP, Zhu SE. Positive effects of Taxol pretreatment on morphology, distribution and ultrastructure of mitochondria and lipid droplets in vitrification of in vitro matured porcine oocytes. Anim Reprod Sci 2009; 115: 158-168.
28. Hafez ESE, Hafez B. Fertilization and cleavage. In: Hafez ESE, Hafez B (eds.), Reproduction in Farm Animals (7th Edition). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000: 110-125.
29. Lin L, Kragh PM, Purup S, Kuwayama M, Du Y, Zhang X, Yang H, Bolund L, Callesen H, Vajta G. Osmotic stress induced by sodium chloride, sucrose or trehalose improves cryotolerance and developmental competence of porcine oocytes. Reprod Fertil Dev 2009; 21: 338-344.
30. Liu Y, Du Y, Lin L, Li J, Kragh PM, Kuwayama M, Bolund L, Yang H, Vajta G. Comparison of efficiency of open pulled straw (OPS) and Cryotop vitrification for cryopreservation of in vitro matured pig oocytes. Cryo Letters 2008; 29: 315-320.
31. Shi LY, Jin HF, Kim JG, Mohana Kumar B, Balasubramanian S, Choe SY, Rho GJ. Ultra-structural changes and developmental potential of porcine oocytes following vitrification. Anim Reprod Sci 2007; 100: 128-140.
32. Du Y, Pribenszky CS, Molnár M, Zhang X, Yang H, Kuwayama M, Pedersen AM, Villemoes K, Bolund L, Vajta G. High hydrostatic pressure: a new way to improve in vitro developmental competence of porcine matured oocytes after vitrification. Reproduction 2008; 135: 13-17.
33. Wu GM, Lai L, Mao J, McCauley TC, Caamaño JN, Cantley T, Rieke A, Murphy CN, Prather RS, Didion BA, Day BN. Birth of piglets by in vitro fertilization of zona-free porcine oocytes. Theriogenology 2004; 62: 1544-1556.