Analyzing repeated measures using resampling methods;Análisis de medidas repetidas usando métodos de remuestreo

Anales de Psicologia

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 400-409

  Vallejo, Guillermo ^a   Paula Fernandez M ^a   Tuero, Ellián ^a   Livacic Rojas, Pablo E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE SANTIAGO DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Empirical critical values; Multisample sphericity; Robustness; Theoretical critical values

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954225299     PISSN: 02129728     EISSN: 16952294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Arnau, J., Bono, R. & Vallejo, G. (2009). Analyzing small samples of re-peated measures data with the mixed-model adjusted F test. Communica-tions in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 38, 1083-1103.
2. Akritas, M. G., Arnold, S.F., & Brunner, E. (1997). Nonparametric hy-potheses and rank statistics for unbalanced factorial designs. Journal of the American Statistical Associacion, 92(437), 258-265.
3. Algina, J., & Oshima, T. C. (1994). Type I error rates for Huynh's general approximation and improved general approximation tests. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 151-165.
4. Anderson, M. J. & ter Braak, C. J. F. (2003). Permutation tests for multifac-torial analysis of variance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 73, 85-113.
5. Beasley, T. M. (2002). Multivariate aligned rank test for interactions in mul-tiple group repeated measures designs. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37(2), 197-226.
6. Berkovits, I., Hancok, G. R., & Nevitt, J. (2000). Bootstrap resampling approaches for repeated measure designs: Relative robustness to sphericity and normality violations. Educational and Psychological Measure-ment, 60, 877-892.
7. Blanca-Mena, M. J. (2004). Alternativas de análisis estadístico en los diseños de medidas repetidas. Psicothema, 16,509-518.
8. Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Sta-tistical Psychology, 31, 144-152.
9. Bono, R., Arnau, J. & Vallejo, G. (2008). Técnicas de análisis aplicadas a datos longitudinales en psicología y ciencias de la salud: Período 1985-2005. Papeles del Psicólogo, 29, 1-15.
10. Chen, X., & Wei, L. (2003). A comparison of recent methods for the analy-sis of small-sample cross-over studies. Statistics in Medicine, 22, 2821-2833.
11. Crowley, P.H. (1992). Resampling methods for computation-intensive data analysis in ecology and evolution, Annual Review of Ecological Systems 23, 405-447.
12. rd Edition. New York: Marcel Dekker.
13. th Edition, London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
14. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
15. Fai, A. y Cornelius, P. (1996). Approximate F-test of multiple degree of freedom hypotheses in generalized least squares analyzes of unbalanced split-plot experiments. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 54, 363-378.
16. Fernández, P., Livacic-Rojas, P. & Vallejo, G. (2007). Cómo elegir la mejor prueba estadística para analizar un diseño de medidas repetidas. Interna-tional Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 7, 153-175.
17. Fisher, R.A. (1935). The Design of Experiments, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.
18. Gomez, V. E., Schaalje, G. B. & Fellingham, G. W. (2005). Performance of the Kenward-Roger method when the covariance structure is selected using AIC and BIC. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computa-tion, 34, 377-392.
19. Gonzales, L. & Manly, B. F. J. (1998), Analysis of variance by randomization with small data sets. Environmetrics 9, 53-65.
20. Good, P. (2002), Extensions of the concept of exchangeability and their applications. Journal of Modem Applied Statistical Methods 1, 243-247.
21. rd Edition, Boston: Birkhäuser.
22. Gurka, M. J. & Edwards, L. J. (2008). Mixed models. En C. R. Rao, J. P. Miller & D. C. Rao (Eds.): Handbook of Statistics, Vol 27, Epidemiological and Medical Statistics (pp. 253-280). New York: Elsevier Science.
23. Johansen, S. (1980). The Welch-James approximation of the distribution of the residual sum of squares in weighted linear regression. Biometrika, 67, 85-92.
24. Jung, B. C., Jhun, M. & Song, S. H. (2006). A new random permutation test in ANOVA models. Statistical Papers, 48, 47-62.
25. Hall, P. (1986). On the number of bootstrap simulations required to con-struct a confidence interval. Annals of Statistics, 14, 1431-1452.
26. Hayes, A. F. (1996). Permutation test is not distribution free. Psychologial Methods, 1, 184-198.
27. Kempthorne, O. & T. E. Doerfler (1969). The behaviour of some signifi-cance tests under experimental randomization. Biometrika 56, 231-48.
28. Kenward, M. G. & Roger, J. H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 53, 983-997.
29. Kenward, M. G. & Roger, J. H. (2009). An improved approximation to the precision of fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Computa-tional Statistics & Data Analysis, 53, 2583-2595.
30. Keselman, J. C. & Keselman, H. J. (1990). Analysing unbalanced repeated measures designs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 265-282.
31. Keselman, J. C., Lix, L. M. & Keselman, H. J. (1996). The analysis of re-peated measurements: A quantitative research synthesis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 275-298.
32. Kowalchuk, R. K. & Headrick, T. C. (2009). Simulating multivariate g-and-h distributions. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. DOI:10.1348/000711009X42 3067.
33. Keselman, H. J., Kowalchuk, R. K., Algina, J., Lix, L. M. & Wilcox, R. R. (2000). Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: Trimmed means and bootstrapping. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 175-191.
34. Kowalchuk, R. K., Keselman, H. J. & Algina, J. (2003). Repeated measures interaction test with aligned ranks. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38(4), 433-461.
35. Kowalchuk, R. K., Keselman, H. J., Algina, J. & Wolfinger, R. D. (2004). The analysis of repeated measurements with mixed-model adjusted F tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 224-242.
36. Laird, N. M. & Ware, J. H. (1982) Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 38, 963-974.
37. Lei, X., Holt, J. K., & Beasley, T. M. (2004). Aligned rank tests as robust alternatives for testing interactions in multiple group repeated measures designs with heterogeneous covariances. Journal of Modern Applied Statisti-cal Methods, 3(2), 462-475.
38. Lix, L. M., Algina, J., & Keselman, H. J. (2003). Analysing multivariate re-peated measures designs: A comparison of two approximate degrees of freedom procedures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 403-431.
39. Livacic-Rojas, P. E., Fernández, M. P. & Vallejo, G. (2006). Procedimientos estadísticos alternativos para evaluar la robustez mediante diseños de medidas repetidas. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 38, 579-598.
40. rd Edition, London: Chapman& Hall/CRC.
41. Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 778-785.
42. Nuevo, R., Cabrera, I., Márquez-González, M. & Montorio, I. (2008). Comparación de dos procedimientos de inducción colectiva de ansie-dad. Anales de Psicología, 24, 106-114.
43. Olson, C. L. (1974). Comparative robustness of six tests in multivariate analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 894-908.
44. Robinson, G. K. (1991). That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. Statistical Science, 6, 15-51.
45. SAS Institute Inc (2008). SAS/STAT® 9.2 User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
46. Schaalje, G. B., McBride, J. B. & Fellingham, G. F. (2002). Adequacy of approximations to distributions of test statistics in complex mixed lin-ear models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 7, 512-524.
47. Schabenberger, O. (2005). Introducing the GLIMMIX Procedure for Gen-eralized Linear Mixed Models. Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual SAS Us-ers Group International Conference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
48. Schabenberger, O. (2007). Growing Up Fast: SAS® 9.2 Enhancements to the GLIMMIX Procedure. Proceedings of the 2007 SAS Global Forum. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
49. Searle, S. R., Casella, G. & McCulloch, C. E. (1992). Variance Components. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
50. ter Braak, C. J.F. (1992), Permutation versus bootstrap significance tests in multiple regression and ANOVA. In Jockel, K. H. (ed.). Bootstrapping and Related Techniques, pp. 79-86. Berlin: Springer.
51. Tukey, J.W. (1977). Modern techniques in data analysis. NSF-sponsored regional research conference at Southern Massachusetts University (North Dartmouth, MA).
52. Vallejo, G. & Ato, M. (2006). Modified Brown-Forsythe procedure for testing interaction effects in split-plot designs. Multivariate Behavioral Re-search, 41, 549-578.
53. Vallejo, G., Ato, M. & Valdés, T. (2008). Consequences of misspecifying the error covariance structure in linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Methodology. European Journal of Research for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4, 10-21.
54. Vallejo, G. & Livacic-Rojas, P. E. (2005). A comparison of two procedures for analyzing small sets of repeated measures data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 179-205.
55. Vonesh, E. F. & Chinchilli, V. M. (1997). Linear and Nonlinear Models for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements. New York: Marcel Dekker.
56. Wilcox, R. R. (2001). Fundamentals of Modern Statistical Methods: Substantially Im-proving Power and Accuracy. New York: Springer.
57. Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). Heterogeneous variance-covariance structures for repeated measures. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 1, 205-230.