Browsing of e-journals by engineering faculty

Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

Volumn 61, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Bennett, Denise Beaubien ^a   Buhler, Amy G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954209155     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10921206     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Boyce, P.D., King, W., Montgomery, C. & Tenopir, C. 2004. How electronic journals are changing patterns of use. Serials Librarian 46:121-141.
2. Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. 2009. Signs of epistemic disruption: transformations in the knowledge system of the academic journal. First Monday 14(4-6). [Internet]. [Cited May 6, 2010]. Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2309.
3. Eason, K., Yu, L.Z. & Harker, S. 2000. The use and usefulness of functions in electronic journals: the experience of the SuperJournal project, Program (2000):1-34.
4. Evans, J.A. 2008. Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship. Science 321(5887):395-9.
5. Hemminger, B.M., Lu, D., Vaughan, K.T.L. & Adams, S.J. 2007. Information seeking behavior of academic scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(14):2205-25.
6. Huntington, P., Nicholas, D. & Jamali, H.R. 2006. Article decay in the digital environment: An analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(13):1840-51.
7. Inger, S. & Gardner, T. 2008. How Readers Navigate to Scholarly Content: Comparing the Changing User Behaviour Between 2005 and 2008 and Its Impact on Publisher Web Site Design and Function. 1-32.Available at:http://www.sic.ox14.com/howreadersnavigatetoscholarlycontent.pdf.
8. Khargonekar, P.P. 2009. State of the College. Presentation to the Dean's Advisory Board, University of Florida's College of Engineering, April 2009. [Internet]. [Cited May 6, 2010]. Available from: http://ppk.eng.ufl.edu/documents/presentations/stateofthecollege_2009.pdf
9. King D.W., Tenopir, C., Choemprayong S. & Wu L. 2009. Scholarly journal information-seeking and reading patterns of faculty at five US universities. Learned Publishing 22(2): 126-144.
10. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H.R. & Tenopir, C. 2006. Finding information in (very large) digital libraries: a deep log approach to determining differences in use according to method of access. Journal of Academic Librarianship 32(2):119-26.
11. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. & Jamali, H.R. 2007. The use, users, and role of abstracts in the digital scholarly environment. Journal of Academic Librarianship 33(4): 446-53.
12. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., & Jamali, H.R. 2008. User diversity: as demonstrated by deep log analysis. Electronic Library 26(1):21-38.
13. Rowlands, I. 2007. Electronic journals and user behavior: A review of recent research. Library & Information Science Research 29(3):369-96.
14. Tenopir, C. 2003. Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources., pub 120. [Internet]. [Cited May 6, 2010]. Available from: http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub120abst.html
15. Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Edwards, S. & Wu, L. 2009a. Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proceedings 61(1): 5-32.
16. Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Spencer, J. & Wu, L. 2009b. Variations in article seeking and reading patterns of academics: what makes a difference? Library & Information Science Research 31: 139-148.
17. University College London. 2008. Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future. [Internet]. [Cited May 6, 2010]. Available from: http://www.bl.uk/news/pdf/googlegen.pdf