A Cost-effective statistical method to correct for differential genotype misclassification when performing case-control genetic association

Human Heredity

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 102-108

  Londono, Douglas ^a   Haynes, Chad ^b   De La Vega, Francisco M ^c   Finch, Stephen J ^d   Gordon, Derek ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS   (United States)

^d USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Differential genotype misclassification; Genotyping errors; Method; Power; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DOMINANT INHERITANCE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC MODEL; GENOTYPE; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RECESSIVE INHERITANCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 77954182774     PISSN: 00015652     EISSN: 14230062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000314470     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kang S, Finch S, Haynes C, Gordon D: Qua n-tifying the percent increase in minimum sample size for SNP genotyping errors in genetic model-based association studies. Hum Hered 2004; 58: 139-144.
2. Kang S, Gordon D, Finch S: What SNP geno-typing errors are most costly for genetic association studies? Genet Epidemiol 20 04; 26: 132-141.
3. Mote V, Anderson R: Aninvestigation of the effect of misclassification on the properties of chi-2-tests in the analysis of categorical data. Biometrika 1965; 52:95-109.
4. Gordon D, Finch S, Nothnagel M, Ott J: Power and sample size calculations for case-control genetic association tests when errors are present: application to single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hum Hered 2002; 54:22-33.
5. Gordon D, Ott J: Assessment and management of single nucleotide polymorphism genotype errors in genetic association analysis. Pac Symp Biocomput 2001: 18-29.
6. Ahn K, Haynes C, Kim W, Fleur R, Gordon D, Finch S: The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the Cochran-Armit-age linear trend test for case/control association studies. Ann Hum Genet 2007; 71: 249-261.
7. Tintle N, Ahn K, Mendell N, Gordon D, Finch S: Characteristics of replicated single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes from Coga: Affymetrix and Center for Inherited Disease Research. BMC Genet 2005; 6:S154.
8. Tintle N, Gordon D, Van Bruggen D, Finch S: The cost effectiveness of duplicate geno-typing for testing genetic association. Ann Hum Genet 2009; 73: 370-378.
9. Tintle N, Lantieri F, Lebrec J, Sohns M, Bal-lard D, Bickeböller H: Inclusion of a priori information in genome-wide association analysis. Genet Epidemiol 2009; 33:S74-S80.
10. Borchers B, Brown M, McLellan B, Bek-metjev A, Tintle N: Incorporating duplicate genotype data into linear trend tests of genetic association: methods and cost-effectiveness. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2009; 8:Article 24.
11. Tintle N, Gordon D, McMahon F, Finch S: Using duplicate genotyped data in genetic analyses: Testing association and estimating error rates. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2007; 6:Article 4.
12. Plagnol V, Cooper J, Todd J, Clayton D: A method to address differential bias in geno-typing in large-scale association studies. PLoS Genet 2007; 3:e74.
13. Clayton D, Walker N, Smyth D, Pask R, Coo-per J, Maier L, Smink L, Lam A, Ovington N, Stevens H, Nutland S, Howson J, Faham M, Moorhead M, Jones H, Falkowski M, Har-denbol P, Willis T, Todd J: Population structure, differential bias and genomic control in a large-scale, case-control association study. Nat Genet 2005; 37: 1243-124 6.
14. Moskvina V, Craddock N, Holmans P, Owen M, O'Donovan M: Effects of differential ge-notyping error rate on the type I error probability of case-control studies. Hum Hered 2006; 61:55-64.
15. Pearce C, Van Den Berg D, Makridakis N, Reichardt J, Ross R, Pike M, Kolonel L, Henderson B: No association between the SRD5A2 gene A49T missense variant and prostate cancer risk: lessons learned. Hum Mol Genet 2008; 17:2456-2461.
16. Marquard V, Beckmann L, Heid I, Lamina C, Chang-Claude J: Impact of genotyping errors on the type I error rate and the power of haplotype-based association methods. BMC Genet 2009; 10:3.
17. Cheng K, Lin W: The effects of misclassifica-tion in studies of gene-environment interactions. Hum Hered 2009; 67:77-87.
18. Ahn K, Gordon D, Finch S: Increase of rejection rate in case-control studies with the differential genotyping error rates. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2009; 8:Article 25.
19. Makridakis N, Ross R, Pike M, Crocitto L, Kolonel L, Pearce C, Henderson B, Reichardt J: Association of mis-sense substitution in SRD5A2 gene with prostate cancer in African-American and hispanic men in Los Angeles, USA. Lancet 1999; 354: 975-978.
20. Moorhead M, Hardenbol P, Siddiqui F, Falkowski M, Bruckner C, Ireland J, Jones H, Jain M, Willis T, Faham M: Optimal genotype determination in highly multiplexed SNP data. Eur J Hum Genet 2006; 14:207-215.
21. Kim W, Gordon D, Sebat J, Ye K, Finch S: Computing power and sample size for case-control association studies with copy number polymorphism: application of mixture-based likelihood ratio test. PLoS ONE 2008; 3:e3475.
22. Gordon D, Yang Y, Haynes C, Finch S, Men-dell N, Brown A, Haroutunian V: Increasing power for tests of genetic association in the presence of phenotype and/or genotype error by use of double-sampling. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004; 3:Article 26.
23. Tenenbein A: A double sampling scheme for estimating from binomial data with misclas-sifications. J Am Stat Assoc 1970; 65:1350-1361.
24. Tenenbein A: A double sampling scheme for estimating from misclassified multinomial data with applications to sampling inspection. Technometrics 1972; 14: 187-202.
25. Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin D: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc B Met 1977; 39:1-38.
26. Douglas J, Skol A, Boehnke M: Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data. Am J Hum Genet 2002; 70: 487-495.
27. Ott J: Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
28. Edwards BJ, Haynes C, Levenstien MA, Finch SJ, Gordon D: Power and sample size calculations in the presence of phenotype errors for case/control genetic association studies. BMC Genet 20 05; 6: 18.
29. Pompanon F, Bonin A, Bellemain E, Taberlet P: Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nat Rev Genet 2005; 6:847-859.
30. Dela Vega F, Lazaruk K, Rhodes M, Wenz M: Assessment of two flexible and compatible SNP genotyping platforms: Taqman SNP Genotyping Assays and the SNPlex Geno-typing System. Mutat Res 2005; 573:111-135.
31. Gordon D, Haynes C, Yang Y, Kramer P, Finch S: Linear trend tests for case-control genetic association that incorporate random phenotype and genotype misclassification error. Genet Epidemiol 2007; 31:853-870.