Improving a complex finite-difference ground water flow model through the use of an analytic element screening model

Ground Water

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1011-1017

  Hunt, Randall J ^a   Anderson, Mary P ^b   Kelson, Victor A ^c  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CALIBRATION; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; ERROR ANALYSIS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLOW OF WATER; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; LAKES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICS;

ANALYTIC ELEMENT SCREENING MODELS; COMPLEX FINITE DIFFERENCE GROUNDWATER FLOW MODELS;

GROUNDWATER;

CALIBRATION; GROUNDWATER FLOW; MODEL;

EID: 0032213113     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02108.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, M.P., and R.J. Hunt. 1994. Regional flow modeling using finite-difference and analytic element methods: A case study and comparison from northern Wisconsin. In Analytic Element Modeling of Groundwater Flow, proceedings, 83. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University.
2. Anderson, M.P., and W.W. Woessner. 1992. Applied Groundwater Modeling. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
3. Cheng, X. 1994. Numerical analysis of groundwater and lake systems with application to the Trout River Basin, Vilas County, Wisconsin. Ph.D. diss., Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
4. Cheng, X., and M.P. Anderson. 1993. Numerical simulation of groundwater interaction with lakes allowing for fluctuating lake levels. Ground Water 31, no. 6: 929-933.
5. Chung, K., and M.P. Anderson. 1997. Use of zones of high hydraulic conductivity to represent lakes in a groundwater flow model. Eos 78, no. 17: 8170.
6. Council, G.W. 1997. Simulating lake-groundwater interaction with MODFLOW. In Proceedings of the 1997 Georgia Water Resour. Conference, ed. E.J. Hatcher, 457-462. Athens, Georgia: The University of Georgia.
7. GeoTrans Inc. 1995. Documentation of Lake Package LAK2. Reston, Virginia: GeoTrans Inc.
8. GeoTrans Inc. 1996. Verification of the Lake Package with the Trout Lake Data Set, Memorandum of May 13, 1996. Reston, Virginia: GeoTrans Inc.
9. Haitjema, H.M. 1995. Analytic Element Modeling of Groundwater Flow. San Diego: Academic Press.
10. Hunt, R.J., and V.A. Kelson. 1997. Simple and complex depiction of lake/groundwater systems using analytic element and finite-difference techniques. Eos 78, no. 17: S170.
11. Hunt, R.J., and J.T. Krohelski. 1996. The application of an analytic element model to investigate groundwater-lake interactions at Pretty Lake, Wisconsin. Journal of Lake and Reservoir Management 12, no. 4: 487-495.
12. Hunt, R.J., V.A. Kelson, and M.P. Anderson. 1998. Linking an analytic element code to MODFLOW - Implementation and benefits. In MODFLOW '98: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of the International Ground Water Modeling Center. Golden, Colorado: Colorado School of Mines.
13. Kelson, V.A., H.M. Haitjema, and S.R. Kraemer. 1993. GAEP: A geographic preprocessor for groundwater flow modeling. Hydrol. Sci. and Tech. 8, 1-4.
14. Kelson, V.A. 1998. Practical advances in groundwater modeling with analytic elements. Ph.D. diss., School of Public and Environmental Affairs, University of Indiana, Bloomington, Indiana.
15. Krabbenhoft, D.P., C.J. Bowser, M.P. Anderson, and J.W. Valley. 1990a. Estimating groundwater exchange with lakes, 1. The stable isotope mass balance method. Water Resour. Res. 26, no. 10: 2445-2453.
16. Krabbenhoft, D. P., M. P. Anderson, and C. J. Bowser. 1990b. Estimating groundwater exchange with lakes, 2. Calibration of a three-dimensional, solute transport model to a stable isotope plume. Water Resour. Res. 26, no. 10: 2455-2462.
17. Leake, S.A., P.W. Lawson, M.R. Lilly, and D.V. Claar. 1998. Assignment of boundary conditions in embedded ground water flow models. Ground Water 36, no. 4: 621-625.
18. Lee, T.M. 1996. Hydrogeologic controls on the groundwater interactions with an acidic lake in karst terrain, Lake Barco, Florida. Water Resour. Res. 32, no. 4: 831-844.
19. McDonald, M.G., and A.W. Harbaugh. 1988. A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model. Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey, Book 6, Ch. A1.
20. Magnuson, J.J., T.K. Kratz, T.M. Frost, C.J. Bowser, B.J. Benson, and R. Nero. 1991. Expanding the temporal and spatial scales of ecological research and comparison of divergent ecosystems: Roles for LTER in the United States. In Long-term Ecological Research, ed. P.G. Risser, 45-70. New York: SCOPE, J. Wiley and Sons Ltd.
21. Prudic, D.E. 1989. Documentation of a computer program to simulate stream-aquifer relations using a modular, finite-difference groundwater flow model. U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Report 88-729.
22. Rumbaugh, J.O., and D.B. Rumbaugh. 1996. Guide to Using Groundwater Vistas: Advanced Model Design & Analysis. Herndon, Virginia: Environmental Simulations Inc.
23. Strack, O.D.L., and H.M. Haitjema. 1981a. Modeling double aquifer flow using a comprehensive potential and distributed singularities, 1. Solution for homogeneous permeabilities. Water Resour. Res. 17, no. 5; 1535-49.
24. Strack, O.D.L., and H.M. Haitjema. 1981b. Modeling double aquifer flow using a comprehensive potential and distributed singularities, 2. Solution for inhomogeneous permeabilities. Water Resour. Res 17, no. 5: 1551-1560.
25. Walker, J. 1997. Written communication, April 2, U.S. Geological Survey, Madison, Wisconsin.
26. Ward, D.S., D.R. Buss, J.W. Mercer, and S.S. Hughes. 1987. Evaluation of a groundwater corrective action at the Chem-Dyne hazardous waste site using a telescopic mesh refinement modeling approach. Water Resour. Res. 23, no. 4: 603-617.
27. Wentz, D.A., and W.J. Rose. 1991. Hydrology of lakes Clara and Vandercook in north-central Wisconsin. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 89-4204.