The risks of "sexual normalcy"

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 13-14

  Green, Ronald M ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENEFICENCE; DECISION MAKING; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HEALTH; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MORALITY; NOTE; PARENT; SEX; SEX DETERMINATION; SEXUALITY;

BENEFICENCE; BIOMEDICAL ENHANCEMENT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; ETHICAL THEORY; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HEALTH; HUMANS; MALE; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PARENTS; SEX; SEX DETERMINATION (ANALYSIS); SEX PRESELECTION; SEXUALITY;

EID: 77954154949     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2010.482650     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Harris, J. 2007. Enhancing evolution: The ethical case for making better people. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Kromberg, J. G. R., D. Castle, E. M. Zwane, and T. Jenkins. 2008. Albinism and skin cancer in southern Africa. Clinical Genetics 36(1): 43-52.
3. Savulescu, J. 2001. Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics 15(5): 413-426.
4. Sparrow, R. 2010. Should human beings have sex? Sexual dimorphism and human enhancement. American Journal of Bioethics 10(7): 3-12.
5. Whitmire, R, 2010. Why boys fail: Saving our sons from an educational system that's leaving them behind. New York: AMACOM.