Should human beings have sex? Sexual dimorphism and human enhancement

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 3-12

  Sparrow, Robert ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Ethics; Human enhancement; Intersex conditions; PGD; Sex; Sex selection

Indexed keywords

ART; ARTICLE; BENEFICENCE; BIRTH; DECISION MAKING; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HERMAPHRODITISM; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MALE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MORALITY; PARENT; POLICY; REPRODUCTION; SEX; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SEXUALITY;

BENEFICENCE; BIOMEDICAL ENHANCEMENT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; ETHICAL THEORY; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HERMAPHRODITISM; HUMAN BODY; HUMANS; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MALE; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PARENTS; PARTURITION; PUBLIC POLICY; REPRODUCTION; SEX; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX PRESELECTION; SEXUALITY;

EID: 77954161108     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2010.489409     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Agar, N. 1998. Liberal eugenics. Public Affairs Quarterly 12(2): 137-153.
2. Agar, N. 2004. Liberal eugenics: In defence of human enhancement. Blackwell: Oxford.
3. Beski, S., A. Gorgy, G. Venkat, I. L. Craft, and K. Edmonds. 2000. Gestational surrogacy: A feasible option for patients with Rokitansky Syndrome. Human Reproduction 15(11): 2326-2328.
4. Bostrom, N., and R. Roache. 2008. Ethical issues in human enhancement. In New waves in applied ethics, eds. T. S. Petersen, J. Ryberg, and C. Wolf, 120-152. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Brock, D. 1995. The non-identity problem and genetic harms. Bioethics 9(3/4): 269-275.
6. Brock, D. 1994. Reproductive freedom: Its nature bases and limits. In Health care ethics: Critical issues for health professionals, eds. D. Thomasma and J. Monagle, 43-61. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
7. Buchanan, A., D. W. Brock, N. Daniels, and D. Wikler. 2000. From chance to choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Chan, S., and J. Harris. 2007. In support of human enhancement. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1(1): article 10.
9. Elliott, C. 2003. Better than well: American medicine meets the American Dream. New York: W. W. Norton.
10. Fausto-Sterling, A. 2000. Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
11. Glover, J. 2006. Choosing children: Genes, disability, and design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Green, R. M. 2007. Babies by design: The ethics of genetic choice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Habermas, J. 2003. The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. Harris, J. 1993. Is gene therapy a form of eugenics? Bioethics 7(2/3): 178-187.
15. Harris, J. 2007. Enhancing evolution: The ethical case for making better people. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. IntersexSocietyofNorthAmerica.2008.Aworldfreeofshame,secrecy, and unwanted genital surgery. Rohnert Park, CA: ISNA. Available at: http://www.isna.org (accessed December 23, 2008).
17. Institute of Medicine Committee on Understanding the Biology of Sex and Gender Differences. 2001. Exploring the biological contributions to human health: Does sex matter? eds. T. M. Wizemann and M.-L. Pardue. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. Kass, L. R. 2002. Life, liberty and the defense of dignity: The challenge of bioethics. San Francisco, CA: Encounter.
19. Kass, L. R. 1997. The wisdom of repugnance. New Republic 216(22): 17-26.
20. Kessler, S. J. 1998. Lessons from the intersexed. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
21. Kitcher, P. 1996. The lives to come: The genetic revolution and human possibilities. New York: Simon & Schuster.
22. Laqueur, T. W. 1990. Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Lareau, A. C. 2003. Who decides? Genital-normalising surgery on intersexed infants. Georgetown Law Journal 92(1): 129-151.
24. McKibben, B. 2003. Enough: Staying human in an engineered age. New York: Times Books.
25. Meyerowitz, J. J. 2002. How sex changed: A history of transsexuality in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Morcel, K., and L. Camborieux. 2007. Programme de recherches sur les Aplasies Müllériennes & Guerrier D. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2(13).
27. Nelson, J. L. 1998. The meaning of the act: Reflections on the expressive force of reproductive decision making and policies. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8(2): 165-182.
28. Oppelt, P., S. P. Renner, A. Kellerman, S. Brucker, G. A. Hauser, K. S. Ludwig, P. L. Strissel, R. Strick, D. Wallwiener, and M. W. Beckman. 2006. Clinical aspects of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-Hauser Syndrome: Recommendations for clinical diagnosis and staging. Human Reproduction 21(3): 792-797.
29. Parens, E. 1995. The goodness of fragility: On the prospect of genetic technologies aimed at the enhancement of human capabilities. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5(2): 141-153.
30. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
31. President's Council on Bioethics. 2003. Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. Washington, DC: The President's Council on Bioethics.
32. Robertson, J. 1994. Children of choice: Freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. Roco, M. C., and W. S. Bainbridge, eds. 2002. Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
34. Sandel, M. J. 2007. The case against perfection: Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Savulescu, J. 2001. Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics 15(5): 413-426.
36. Savulescu, J. 2005. New breeds of humans: The moral obligation to enhance. Ethics, Law and Moral Philosophy of Reproductive Biomedicine 1(1): 36-39.
37. Savulescu, J. 2006. Genetic interventions and the ethics of enhancement of human beings. In The Oxford handbook on bioethics, ed. B. Steinbock, 516-535. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Scruton, R. 2006. Sexual desire: A philosophical investigation. New York: Continuum.
39. Silver, L. M. 1999. Remaking Eden: Cloning, genetic engineering and the future of human kind. London: Phoenix.
40. Sparrow, R. 2010. Better than men? Sex and the therapy/enhancement distinction. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. in press.
41. Sparrow, R. 2008. Is it 'every man's right to have babies if he wantsthem'?Malepregnancy and the limits of reproductiveliberty. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18(3): 275-299.
42. Sparrow, R. 2007. Procreative beneficence, obligation, and eugenics. Genomics, Society and Policy 3(3): 43-59.
43. Steinbock, B. 2000. Disability, prenatal testing, and selective abortion. In Prenatal testing and disability rights, eds. E. Parens and A. Asch, 108-123. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
44. Stock, G. 2003. Redesigning humans: Choosing our children's genes. London: Profile Books.
45. Walker, M. 2007. Superlongevity and utilitarianism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85(4): 581-595.
46. World Health Organization. 2009. World health statistics 2009. Geneva: World Health Organization.