Exploring the capacity of NEO PI-R facets to predict job performance in two french-canadian samples

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 201-207

  Denis, Pascale L ^a   Morin, Denis ^a   Guindon, Claude ^b  

^a Université du Québec à Montréal   (Canada)

^b HYDRO QUÉBEC   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954128276     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: 14682389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00501.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ashton MC, Jackson DN, Paunonen SV, Helmes E, Rothstein MG. The criterion validity of broad factor scales versus specific facet scales. Journal of Research in Personality 1995, 29:432-442.
2. Barrett GV. Practitioner's view of personality testing and industrial-organizational psychology: Practical and legal issues. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008, 1:299-302.
3. Barrick MR, Mount MK. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 1991, 44:1-26.
4. Barrick MR, Mount MK. Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance 2005, 18:359-372.
5. Barrick MR, Mount MK, Judge TA. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2001, 9:9-30.
6. Beaty JC. 2000, Person, situation, and interactive influences on individuals' willingness to engage in contextual performance behavior. (09), 5036B. (UMI No. 9986262)
7. Becker TE. Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analyses with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods 2005, 8:274-289.
8. Bharadwaj Bishop NB. 1996, The Big Five and personnel selection: Factors impacting responses and criterion validities. (03), 2195B. (UMI No. 9623208)
9. Black J. Personality testing and police selection: Utility of the 'Big Five'. New Zealand Journal of Psychology 2000, 29:2-9.
10. Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel selection in organizations 1993, 71-98. Schmitt N, Borman WC. (Eds.), San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass
11. Boudrias J-S, Pettersen N, Longpré P, Plunier P. 2008, Report prepared for the Société québécoise de psychologie du travail et des organisations, Montreal
12. Burch GStJ, Anderson N. Personality as a predictor of work-related behavior and performance: Recent advances and directions for future research. International review of industrial and organizational psychology 2008, Vol. 23:261-305. Hodgkinson GP, Ford JK. (Eds.), Chichester, UK, Wiley
13. Catano VM, Cronshaw SF, Wiesner WH, Hackett RD, Methot LL. Recruitment and selection in Canada 2001, 2nd ed, ON, Canada, Nelson Thomson Learning
14. Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO PI-R. Inventaire de Personnalité-Révisé 1998, Paris, France, Les Éditions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée
15. Detrick P, Chibnall JT, Luebbert MC. The revised NEO personality inventory as predictor of police academy performance. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2004, 31:676-694.
16. Dudley NM, Orvis KA, Lebiecki JE, Cortina JM. A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology 2006, 91:40-57.
17. Garamszegi LZ. Comparing effect sizes across variables: Generalization without the need for Bonferroni correction. Behavioral Ecology 2006, 4:682-687.
18. (2006, April)., http://www5.hrsdc.gc.ca/NOC/English/NOC/2006/Tutorial.aspx, Human Resources and Skills Development Canada., Retrieved June 9, 2009 from
19. McCrae RR, Costa PT. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist 1997, 52:509-516.
20. Motowidlo SJ, Borman WC, Schmit MJ. A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance 1997, 10:71-83.
21. Rothstein MG, Goffin RD. The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support? Human Resource Management Review 2006, 16:155-180.
22. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics 2001, 4th Ed, New York, NY, Allyn and Bacon/Pearson Education Company
23. Tett RP, Christiansen ND. Personality tests at the crossroads: A response to Morgeson, Campion, Dipboye, Hollenbeck, Murphy, and Schmitt (2007). Personnel Psychology 2007, 60:967-993.
24. Timmerman TA. Relationships between NEO PI-R personality measures and job performance ratings of inbound call center employees. Applied HRM Research 2004, 9:35-38.
25. Van Scotter JR, Motowidlo SJ. Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 1996, 81:525-531.