Case C-158/07, Jacqueline Förster v. Hoofddirectie van de informatie beheer groep, judgment of the court (Grand Chamber) of 18 November 2008

Common Market Law Review

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 2021-2039

  Golynker, Oxana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954122224     PISSN: 01650750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (56)

1. Case C-209/03, R. (on the application of Bidar) v. Ealing LBC, [2005] ECR I-2119.
2. Opinion, para 76.
3. Opinion, paras. 83-88 and 90.
4. Opinion, para 130.
5. Opinion, para 142.
6. Judgment, paras. 30-33.
7. Judgment, paras. 40-45 and 49.
8. Judgment, paras 51-54.
9. Judgment, paras. 55-58.
10. Judgment, para 59.
11. Judgment, paras. 69-71.
12. Opinion, paras. 97 and 130.
13. Dougan and Spaventa, "'Wish you weren't here ...' New models of social solidarity in the European Union" in Dougan and Spaventa (Eds.), Social Welfare and EU Law (Hart Publishing, 2005), pp. 181-218, at 214.
14. Haibronner, "Union citizenship and access to social benefits", 42 CML Rev. (2005), 1245, at 1251.
15. Förster judgment, para 59.
16. Cf.: Dougan, "Fees, grants, loans, dole cheques: Who covers the costs of migrant education within the EU?", 42 CML Rev. (2005), 943-986, at 969.
17. Förster judgment, para 58.
18. See annotation of Bidar by Barnard, 42 CML Rev., (2005), 1465-1489.
19. E.g., cf. Case 302/84, A.A.Ten Holder v. Bestuur van de Nieuwe Algemene Bedrijfsvereniging, [1986] ECR 1821 and Case C-352/06, Brigitte Bosmann v. Bundesagentur für Arbeit Familienkasse Aachen, [2008] ECR I-3827.
20. See also Golynker, "Co-ordination of Social Security Schemes in the European Union: The Rashomon effect in Bosmann", 2 JSSL (2009), 61-75.
21. See Golynker, "Student loans: The European concept of social justice according to Bidar", 31 EL Rev. (2006), 390-401, at 398.
22. See Case 139/85, Kempf, [1986] ECR 1741.
23. Case C-90/97, Swaddling, [1999] ECR I-1075.
24. See Golynker, "Jobseekers' rights in the European Union: Challenges of changing the paradigm of social solidarity", 30 EL Rev. (2005), 111-122.
25. Joined Cases C-22/08 & C-23/08, Vatsouras and Koupatantze, Judgment of 4 June 2009, nyr.
26. Vatsouras and Koupatantze, cited supra note 24, A.G. Opinion, para 55.
27. Vatsouras and Koupatantze judgment, cited supra note 24, para 45. 27. Ibid., para 42.
28. Vatsouras and Koupatantze, cited supra note 24, A.G. Opinion, para 55.
29. See O'Brien, "Real links, abstract rights and false alarms: The relationship between the ECJ's 'real link' case law and national solidarity", 33 EL Rev. (2008), 643-665.
30. Barnard, "EU Citizenship and the Principle of Solidarity" in Dougan and Spaventa (Eds.), Social Welfare and EU Law (Hart Publishing, 2005), pp. 157-180, at 166.
31. For other examples see Somek, "Solidarity decomposed: Being and time in European citizenship", 32 EL Rev. (2007), 787-818, at 796-800.
32. Case C-413/99, Baumbast, [2002] ECR I-7091, para 92.
33. Presidency Conclusions of the European Council (23-24 March 2000), para 26.
34. Joined Cases C-11/06 & C-12/06, Morgan and Bucher, [2007] ECR I-9161.
35. For a detailed analysis of Morgan and Bucher see Dougan, "Cross-border educational mobility and the exportation of student financial assistance", 33 EL Rev. (2008), 723-738.
36. See Case C-499/06, Halina Nerkowska v. Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Koszalinie, [2008] ECR I-3993.
37. Case C-85/96, Maria Martínez Sala v. Freistaat Bayern, [1998] ECR I-2691.
38. O'Leary, "The Social Dimension of Community Citizenship" in Rosas and Antola (Eds.), A Citizen's Europe: In Search of a New Order (Sage Publications, 1995), p. 156.
39. See also Fries and Shaw, "Citizenship of the Union: First steps in the European Court of Justice", (1998) EPL, 533 et seq.
40. White, "Free movement, equal treatment, and Citizenship of the Union", 54 ICLQ (2005), 885-906.
41. See also O'Brien, "Social blind spots and monocular policy making: The ECJ's migrant worker model", 46 CML Rev., 1107-1141.
42. Förster A.G. Opinion, para 80.
43. Case 39/86, Lair, [1988] ECR 3161, para 39; Case 197/86, Brown, [1988] ECR 3205, para 26; Case C357/89, Raulin, [1992] ECR I-1027, para 21; Case C-413/01, Ninni-Orasche, [2003] ECR I-13187, para 35.
44. Förster A.G. Opinion, para 80.
45. Case 66/85, Lawrie-Blum, [1986] ECR 2121, paras. 16 and 17. See also Case 53/81, Levin, [1982] ECR 1035.
46. Lair, para 39; Brown, para 26; Raulin, para 21; Ninni-Orasche, para 35; all cited supra note 45.
47. Förster A.G. Opinion, paras. 83-84.
48. Förster A.G. Opinion, para 85.
49. rd ed. (Handelshøjskolens Forlag, 1997), p. 139.
50. See Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: more and better jobs through flexibility and security. COM(2007)359 final.
51. See also Madsen, "Flexicurity Towards a set of common principles?" 23 IJCLIR (2007), 525-542.
52. Presidency Conclusions of the European Council (8-9 March 2007), para. 15.
53. Förster A.G. Opinion, para 85.
54. Case 139/85, Kempf, [1986] ECR 1741, Case C-292/89, Bernini, [1992] ECR I-.
55. See e.g. Case C-499/06, Nerkowska, [2008] ECR I-3993, Opinion of A.G. Maduro.
56. See Daily Hansard, House of Commons debates, 12 March 2009. www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm090312/debtext/90312-0002.htm#09031256001100.