A Dyadic analysis of the between- and within-system alliances on distress

Family Process

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 220-235

  Anderson, Shayne R ^a   Johnson, Lee N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Couple Therapy; Dyadic Analysis; Therapeutic Alliance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MARITAL THERAPY; MENTAL STRESS; MULTICENTER STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOTHERAPY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; COUPLES THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC PROCESSES; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 77954114996     PISSN: 00147370     EISSN: 15455300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01319.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arbuckle JL. Amos 6.0 user's guide 2005, Chicago, SPSS Inc
2. Beck M, Friedlander ML, Escudero V. Three perspectives on clients' experiences of the therapeutic alliance: A discovery-oriented investigation. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 2006, 32((3)):355-368.
3. Bourgeois L, Sabourin S, Wright J. Predictive validity of therapeutic alliance in group marital therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1990, 58((5)):608-613.
4. Busby DM, Crane DR, Larson JH, Christensen C. A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 1995, 21((3)):289-308.
5. Cook WL, Kenny DA. The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2005, 29((2)):101-109.
6. Cook WL, Snyder DK. Analyzing nonindependent outcomes in couple therapy using the actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology 2005, 19((1)):133-141.
7. Crane DR, Middleton KC, Bean RA. Establishing criterion scores for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. American Journal of Family Therapy 2000, 28((1)):53-60.
8. Doerfler LA, Addis ME, Moran PW. Evaluating mental health outcomes in an inpatient setting: Convergent and divergent validity of the OQ-45 and BASIS-32. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 2002, 29((4)):394-403.
9. Horvath AO. The alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 2001, 38((4)):365-372.
10. Johnson SM. The practice of emotionally focused marital therapy: Creating connection 1996, Philadelphia, Brunner/Mazel
11. Johnson SM, Talitman E. Predictors of success in emotionally focused marital therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 1997, 23((2)):135-152.
12. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis 2006, New York, Guilford Press
13. Knobloch-Fedders LM, Pinsof WM, Mann BJ. The formation of the therapeutic alliance in couple therapy. Family Process 2004, 43((4)):425-442.
14. Knobloch-Fedders LM, Pinsof WM, Mann BJ. Therapeutic alliance and treatment progress in couple psychotherapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 2007, 33((2)):245-257.
15. Lambert MJ, Hansen NB, Umpress V, Lunnen K, Okiishi J, Burlingame GM. Adminstration and scoring manual for the OQ-45.2 (outcome questionnaire) 1996, Stevenson, MD, American Professional Credentialing Services LLC
16. Lambert MJ, Okiishi JC, Finch AE, Johnson LD. Outcome assessment: From conceptualization to implementation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 1998, 29((1)):63-70.
17. Little RJ, Rubin DB. The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods and Research 1989, 18((2 and 3)):292-326.
18. Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000, 68((3)):438-450.
19. Mueller RM, Lambert MJ, Burlingame GM. Construct validity of the outcome questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment 1998, 70((2)):248-262.
20. Pinsof WM. An integrative systems perspective on the therapeutic alliance: Theoretical, clinical, and research implications. The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice 1994, 173-195. Horvath AOGreenberg LS. (Eds.), New York, John Wiley & Sons
21. Pinsof WM, Catherall DR. The integrative psychotherapy alliance: Family, couple and individual therapy scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 1986, 12((2)):137-151.
22. Pinsof WM, Zinbarg R, Knobloch-Fedders LM. Factorial and construct validity of the revised short form integrative psychotherapy alliance scales for family, couple, and individual therapy. Family Process 2008, 47((3)):281-301.
23. Raytek HS, McCrady BS, Epstein EE, Hirshch LS. Therapeutic alliance and the retention of couples in conjoint alcoholism treatment. Addictive Behaviors 1999, 24((3)):317-330.
24. Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family 1976, 38((1)):15-28.
25. Sprenkle DH, Blow AJ. Common factors and our sacred models. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 2004, 30((2)):113-129.
26. Symonds D, Horvath AO. Optimizing the alliance in couple therapy. Family Process 2004, 43((4)):443-455.
27. Umphress VJ, Lambert MJ, Smart DW, Barlow SH, Clouse G. Concurrent and construct validity of the outcome questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 1997, 15((1)):40-55.
28. Vermeersch DA, Lambert MJ, Burlingame GM. Outcome questionnaire: Item sensitivity to change. Journal of Personality Assessment 2000, 74((2)):242-261.
29. Wells MG, Burlingame GM, Lambert MJ, Hoag MJ, Hope CA. Conceptualization and measurement of patient change during psychotherapy: Development of the outcome questionnaire and youth outcome questionnaire. Psychotherapy 1996, 33((2)):275-283.