Systems modelling approaches to the design of safe healthcare delivery: Ease of use and usefulness perceived by healthcare workers

Ergonomics

Volumn 53, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 829-847

  Jun, Gyuchan Thomas ^a   Ward, James ^a   Clarkson, P John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Healthcare; Patient safety; Risk management; System design; Systems modelling

Indexed keywords

CHARACTERISATION; COMPLEX SYSTEMS; DESIGN PRACTICE; EASE OF USE; HEALTH SERVICES; HEALTHCARE DELIVERY; HEALTHCARE WORKERS; HUMAN FACTORS; META MODEL; OUT OF STEP; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIOR EXPERIENCE; SAFETY-CRITICAL; SYSTEMS MODELLING;

HEALTH RISKS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; RISK MANAGEMENT;

DESIGN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTION; PILOT STUDY; PROSTATE TUMOR; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY; SYSTEMS THEORY; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; PERCEPTION; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS THEORY;

EID: 77954097689     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2010.489653     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Beuscart-Zephir, M.C., et al., 2007. Cognitive analysis of physicians and nurses cooperation in the medication ordering and administration process. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76 (Suppl 1), S65-S77.
2. Booch, G., 1993. Object-oriented analysis and design with applications. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
3. Bozarth, C.C. and Handfield, R.B., 2005. Introduction to operations and supply chain management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
4. Chahed, S., et al., 2006. Operations management related activities for home health care providers. In: A. Dolgai, G. Morel, and C. Pereira, eds. In: Information control problems in manufacturing. St Etienne, France: IFAC, 621-626.
5. Clarkson, P.J., et al., 2004. Design for patient safety: a review of the effectiveness of design in the UK health service. Journal of Engineering Design, 15 (2), 123-140.
6. Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-340.
7. Davis, R., 2008. ARIS design platform: advanced process modelling and administration. London: Springer.
8. DeRosier, J., et al., 2002. Using health care Failure Mode and Effect Analysis. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 28 (5), 248-267.
9. DoH, 2000. An organisation with a memory: report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS. London: Department of Health.
10. DoH, 2001. Building a safer NHS for patients: implementing an organisation with a memory. London: Department of Health.
11. DYADEM, 2003a. Guidelines for Failure Modes & Effects Analysis for medical device. London: CRC Press.
12. DYADEM, 2003b. Guidelines for Failure Modes & Effects Analysis: for automotive, aerospace and general manufacturing industries. London: CRC Press.
13. Edwards, K., 1993. Real-time structured methods: systems analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Edwards, N., 2005. Can quality improvement be used to change the wider healthcare system? Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14 (2), 75.
15. Eriksson, H. and Penker, M., 2000. Business modeling with UML: business patterns at work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Esmail, R., et al., 2005. Using Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis tool to review the process of ordering and administrating potassium chloride and potassium phosphate. Healthcare Quarterly, 8 (special issue), 73-80.
17. Forster, A.J., et al., 2003. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138 (3), 161-167.
18. Glintborg, B., Andersen, S.E., and Dalhoff, K., 2007. Insufficient communication about medication use at the interface between hospital and primary care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 16 (1), 34-39.
19. Habraken, M.M.P., et al., 2009. Prospective risk analysis of health care processes: A systematic evaluation of the use of HFMEA in Dutch health care. Ergonomics, 52 (7), 809-819.
20. Harper, P. and Pitt, M., 2004. On the challenges of healthcare modelling and a proposed project life cycle for successful implementation. Journal of Operational Research Society, 55 (6), 657-661.
21. Harrison, M., Eardley, W., and McCarron, B., 2005. Time to hand over our old way of working. Hospital Medicine, 66 (7), 399-400.
22. Holt, J., 2004. UML for systems engineering: Watching the wheels. London: Institution of Electrical Engineers.
23. Hyatt, N., 2003. Guidelines for process hazards analysis: hazards identification & risk analysis. Ontario: CRC Press.
24. Jun, G.T., et al., 2009. Health care process modelling: which method when? International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 21 (3), 214-224.
25. Kirwan, B. and Ainsworth, L.K., 1992. A guide to task analysis. London: Taylor & Francis.
26. Kizer, K.W., 2002. Patient centred care: essential but probably not sufficient. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 11 (2), 117-118.
27. Kletz, T., 1992. HAZOP and HAZAN: identifying and assessing process industry hazards. Rugby, UK: Institution of Chemical Engineers.
28. Kohn, L.T., Corrigan, J.M., and Donaldson, M.S., eds. 2000. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. Lyons, M., et al., 2004. Human reliability analysis in healthcare: A review of techniques. International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, 16 (4), 223-237.
30. Mayer, R.J., et al., 1992. IDEF family of methods for concurrent engineering and business re-engineering applications [online]. Available from: http://www.idef.com/pdf/IDEFFAMI.pdf [Accessed January 2010].
31. Middleton, S. and Roberts, A., 2000. Integrated care pathways: a practical approach to implementation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
32. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, 2007. Improvement leaders' guide: process mapping, analysis and redesign. Coventry: University of Warwick.
33. OMG, 2008. OMG Systems Modeling Language [online]. Object Management Group, Inc. Available from: http://www.sysmlforum.com/docs/specs/OMGSysML-v1.1-08-11-01.pdf [Accessed January 2010].
34. OMG, 2009. OMG United Modeling Language [online]. Object Management Group, Inc. Available from: http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/09-02-04.pdf [Accessed January 2010].
35. Pidd, M., 2003. Tools for thinking: modelling in management science. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
36. Pradhan, M., Edmonds, M., and Runciman, W., 2001. Quality in healthcare: process. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Anaesthesiology, 15 (4), 555-571.
37. Redmill, F., Chudleigh, M., and Catmur, J., 1999. System safety: HAZOP and software HAZOP. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
38. Reid, P.P. and et al., 2005. Building a better delivery system: a new engineering/health care partnership. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
39. Riley, R., Manias, E., and Polglase, A., 2006. Governing the surgical count through communication interactions: implications for patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15 (5), 369-374.
40. Sheridan-Leos, N., Schulmeister, L., and Hartranft, S., 2006. Failure mode and effect analysis: a technique to prevent chemotherapy errors. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 10 (3), 393-398.
41. Smith, T., 2006. Changing relationships between people and providers: making sense of patient centred health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15 (1), 71-73.
42. Spear, S.J. and Schmidhofer, M., 2005. Ambiguity and workarounds as contributors to medical error. Annals of Internal Medicine, 142 (8), 627-630.
43. Stanton, N.A. and Baber, C., 2005. Validating task analysis for error identification: reliability and validity of a human error prediction technique. Ergonomics, 48 (9), 1097-1113.
44. Topper, A., Ouellette, D., and Jorgensen, P., 1994. Structured methods: merging models, techniques, and CASE. New York/London: McGraw-Hill.
45. van Tilburg, C.M., et al., 2006. Health Care Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: a useful proactive risk analysis in a pediatric oncology ward. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15 (1), 58-63.
46. Venkatesh, V., 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11 (4), 342-365.
47. Vincent, C., Taylor-Adams, S., and Stanhope, N., 1998. Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. British Medical Journal, 316, 1154-1157.
48. Wilson, K.A., et al., 2005. Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14 (4), 303-309.
49. Zachman, J., 1987. A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26 (3), 276-292.