High-contrast three-dimensional imaging of the Arabidopsis leaf enables the analysis of cell dimensions in the epidermis and mesophyll

Plant Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Wuyts, Nathalie ^a   Palauqui, Jean Christophe ^b   Conejero, Geneviève ^c   Verdeil, Jean Luc ^c   Granier, Christine ^a   Massonnet, Catherine ^a  

^a UMR 759 LEPSE   (France)

^b INSTITUT JEAN PIERRE BOURGIN   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; DICOTYLEDONEAE; MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 77954073619     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17464811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1746-4811-6-17     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Pyke KA, Marrison JL, Leech RM. Temporal and spatial development of the cells of the expanding first leaf of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. J Exp Bot 1991, 42:1407-1416.
2. Tsukaya H. Controlling size in multicellular organs: focus on the leaf. PLoS Biol 2008, 6:e174. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060174, 2459211,2459211, 18630989.
3. Granier C, Tardieu F. Multi-scale phenotyping of leaf expansion in response to environmental changes: the whole is more than the sum of parts. Plant Cell Env 2009, 32:1175-1184.
4. Dengler NG. Comparative histological basis of sun and shade leaf dimorphism in Helianthus annuus. Can J Bot 1980, 58:717-730.
5. Schurr U, Heckenberger U, Herdel K, Walter A, Feil R. Leaf development in Ricinus communis during drought stress: dynamics of growth processes, of cellular structure and of sink-source transition. J Exp Bot 2000, 51:1515-1529. 10.1093/jexbot/51.350.1515, 11006303.
6. Yano S, Terashima I. Separate localization of light signal perception for sun or shade type chloroplast and palisade tissue differentiation in Chenopodium album. Plant Cell Physiol 2001, 42:1303-1310. 10.1093/pcp/pce183, 11773522.
7. Scippa GS, Di Michele M, Onelli E, Patrignani G, Chiatante D, Bray EA. The histone-like protein H1-S and the response of tomato leaves to water deficit. J Exp Bot 2004, 55:99-109. 10.1093/jxb/erh022, 14645393.
8. Yano S, Terashima I. Developmental process of sun and shade leaves in Chenopodium album. Plant Cell Env 2004, 27:781-793.
9. Onoda Y, Schieving F, Anten NPR. Effects of light and nutrient availability on leaf mechanical properties of Plantago major: a conceptual approach. Ann Bot 2008, 101:727-736. 10.1093/aob/mcn013, 2710173, 18272529.
10. Cookson SJ, Van Lijsebettens M, Granier C. Correlation between leaf growth variables suggest intrinsic and early controls of leaf size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Env 2005, 28:1355-1366.
11. Tisne S, Reymond M, Vile D, Fabre J, Dauzat M, Koornneef M, Granier C. Combined genetic and modeling approaches reveal that epidermal cell area and number in leaves are controlled by leaf and plant developmental processes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2008, 148:1117-1127. 10.1104/pp.108.124271, 2556812, 18701672.
12. Fujikura U, Horiguchi G, Ponce MR, Micol JL, Tsukaya H. Coordination of cell proliferation and cell expansion mediated by ribosome-related processes in the leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2009, 59:499-508. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03886.x, 19392710.
13. Tsuge T, Tsukaya H, Uchimiya H. Two independent and polarized processes of cell elongation regulate leaf blade expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Development 1996, 122:1589-1600.
14. Donnelly PM, Bonetta D, Tsukaya H, Dengler RE, Dengler NG. Cell cycling and cell enlargement in developing leaves of Arabidopsis. Dev Biol 1999, 215:407-419. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9443, 10545247.
15. Desvoyes B, Ramirez-Parra E, Xie Q, Chua NH, Gutierrez C. Cell type-specific role of the retinoblastoma/E2F pathway during Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Physiol 2006, 140:67-80. 10.1104/pp.105.071027, 1326032, 16361519.
16. Horiguchi G, Fujikura U, Ferjani A, Ishikawa N, Tsukaya H. Large-scale histological analysis of leaf mutants using two simple leaf observation methods: identification of novel genetic pathways governing the size and shape of leaves. Plant J 2006, 48:638-644. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02896.x, 17076802.
17. Horiguchi G, Gonzalez N, Beemster GTS, Inzé D, Tsukaya H. Impact of segmental chromosomal duplications on leaf size in the grandifolia-D mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2009, 60:122-133. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03940.x, 19508432.
18. Heckenberger U, Roggatz U, Schurr U. Effect of drought stress on the cytological status in Ricinus communis. J Exp Bot 1998, 49:181-189.
19. Kinsman EA, Pyke KA. Bundle sheath cells and cell-specific plastid development in Arabidopsis leaves. Development 1998, 125:1815-1822.
20. Veres JS, Cofer GP, Johnson GA. Magnetic resonance imaging of leaves. New Phytol 1993, 123:769-774.
21. Ishida N, Koizumi M, Kano H. The NMR microscope: a unique and promising tool for plant science. Ann Bot 2000, 86:259-278.
22. Van As H. Intact plant MRI for the study of cell water relations, membrane permeability, cell-to-cell and long distance water transport. J Exp Bot 2006, 58:743-756. 10.1093/jxb/erl157, 17175554.
23. Hettinger JW, de la Peña Mattozzi M, Myers WR, Williams ME, Reeves A, Parsons RL, Haskell RC, Petersen DC, Wang R, Medford JI. Optical coherence microscopy. A technology for rapid, in vivo, non-destructive visualization of plants and plant cells. Plant Physiol 2000, 123:3-15. 10.1104/pp.123.1.3, 1539250, 10806220.
24. Reeves A, Parsons RL, Hettinger JW, Medford JI. In vivo three-dimensional imaging of plants with optical coherence microscopy. J Microsc 2002, 208:177-189. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01086.x, 12460449.
25. Stuppy WH, Maisano JA, Colbert MW, Rudall PJ, Rowe TB. Three-dimensional analysis of plant structure using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Trends Plant Sci 2003, 8:2-6. 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)00004-3, 12523992.
26. Lee K, Avondo J, Morrison H, Blot L, Stark M, Sharpe J, Bangham A, Coen E. Visualizing plant development and gene expression in three dimensions using optical projection tomography. Plant Cell 2006, 18:2145-2156. 10.1105/tpc.106.043042, 1560903, 16905654.
27. Jahnke S, Menzel MI, van Dusschoten D, Roeb GW, Bühler J, Minwuyelet S, Blümler P, Temperton VM, Hombach T, Streun M, Beer S, Khodaverdi M, Ziemons K, Coenen HH, Schurr U. Combined MRI-PET dissects dynamic changes in plant structures and functions. Plant J 2009, 59:634-644. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03888.x, 19392708.
28. Feijó JA, Moreno N. Imaging plant cells by two-photon excitation. Protoplasma 2004, 223:1-32. 10.1007/s00709-003-0026-2, 15004740.
29. Moreno N, Bougourd S, Haseloff J, Feijó JA. Imaging plant cells. Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy 2006, 769-787. New York: SpringerScience and Business Media, Pawley JB, 3.
30. Bougourd S, Marrison J, Haseloff J. An aniline blue staining procedure for confocal microscopy and 3D imaging of normal and perturbed cellular phenotypes in mature Arabidopsis embryos. Plant J 2000, 24:543-550. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00892.x, 11115135.
31. Truernit E, Bauby H, Dubreucq B, Grandjean O, Runions J, Barthelemy J, Palauqui JC. High-resolution whole-mount imaging of three-dimensional tissue organization and gene expression enables the study of phloem development and structure in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2008, 20:1494-1503. 10.1105/tpc.107.056069, 2483377, 18523061.
32. Kosma DK, Bourdenx B, Bernard A, Parsons EP, Lu S, Joubès J, Jenks MA. The impact of water deficiency on leaf cuticle lipids of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2009, 151:1918-1929. 10.1104/pp.109.141911, 2785987, 19819982.
33. Buda GJ, Isaacson T, Matas AJ, Paolillo DJ, Rose JKC. Three-dimensional imaging of plant cuticle architecture using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Plant J 2009, 60:378-385. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03960.x, 19563439.
34. ImageJ. , http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/
35. MedINRIA Image Viewer. , http://www-sop.inria.fr/asclepios/software/MedINRIA/
36. R Development Core Team. , http://www.R-project.org
37. Savaldi-Goldstein S, Chory J. Growth coordination and the shoot epidermis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2008, 11:42-48. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.10.009, 2274781, 18065257.
38. Bai Y, Falk S, Schnittger A, Jakoby MJ, Hülskamp M. Tissue layer specific regulation of leaf length and width in Arabidopsis as revealed by the cell autonomous action of ANGUSTIFOLIA. Plant J 2010, 61:191-199. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04050.x, 19843316.
39. Flexas J, Ortuño MF, Ribas-Carbo M, Diaz-Espejo A, Flórez-Sarasa ID, Medrano H. Mesophyll conductance to CO2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 2007, 175:501-511. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02111.x, 17635225.
40. Poorter H, Niinemets T, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytol 2009, 182:565-588. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02830.x, 19434804.
41. Parkhurst DF. Stereological methods for measuring internal leaf structure variables. Am J Bot 1982, 1:31-39.
42. Granier C, Aguirrezabal L, Chenu K, Cookson SJ, Dauzat M, Hamard P, Thioux JJ, Rolland G, Bouchier-Combaud S, Lebaudy A, Muller B, Simonneau T, Tardieu F. PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. New Phytol 2006, 169:623-635. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01609.x, 16411964.
43. Phenopsis database. , http://bioweb.supagro.inra.fr/phenopsis