The histone-like protein H1-S and the response of tomato leaves to water deficit

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 55, Issue 394, 2004, Pages 99-109

  Scippa, Gabriella S ^a   Di Michele, Michela ^a   Onelli, Elisabetta ^b   Patrignani, Giuseppe ^b   Chiatante, Donato ^c   Bray, Elizabeth A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MOLISE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Antisense; Chromatin; H1 histone; Relative water content; Stomatal conductance; Tomato; Water deficit stress

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEINS; TISSUE; WATER;

HISTONES; TRANSGENIC PLANTS;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

HISTONE; WATER;

ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; GENETICS; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; TOMATO; TRANSGENIC PLANT; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

HISTONES; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MUTATION; PLANT LEAVES; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; WATER;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 0346463338     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erh022     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ascenzi R, Gantt JS. 1997. A drought-stress-inducible histone gene in Arabidopsis thaliana is a member of a distinct class of plant linker histone variants. Plant Molecular Biology 34, 629-641.
2. Ascenzi R, Gantt JS. 1999. Molecular genetic analysis of the drought-inducible linker histone variant in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Molecular Biology 41, 159-169.
3. Bouvet P, Dimitrov S, Wolffe AP. 1994. Specific regulation of Xenopus chromosomal 5S rRNA gene transcription in vivo by histone H1. Genes and Development 8, 1147-1159.
4. Bray EA. 1997. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science 2, 48-54.
5. Bray EA. 2002. Classification of genes differentially expressed during water-deficit stress in Arabidopsis thaliana: an analysis using microarray and differential expression data. Annals of Botany 89, 803-811.
6. Bray EA, Shih T-Y, Moses MS, Cohen A, Imai R, Plant ÁL. 1999. Water-deficit induction of a tomato H1 histone requires abscisic acid. Plant Growth Regulation 29, 35-46.
7. Cartwright IL, Elgin SC. 1986. Nucleosomal instability and induction of new upstream protein-DNA associations accompany activation of four small heat shock protein genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Molecular and Celleular Biology 6, 779-791.
8. Chao WS, Gu YQ, Pautot VV, Bray EA, Walling LL. 1999. Leucine aminopeptidase RNAs, proteins, and activities increase in response to water deficit, salinity, and the wound signals systemin, methyl jasmonate, and abscisic acid. Plant Physiology 120, 979-992.
9. Cohen A, Bray EA. 1990. Characterization of three messenger RNAs that accumulate in wilted tomato leaves in response to elevated levels of endogenous abscisic acid. Planta 182, 27-33.
10. Cohen A, Moses MS, Plant AL, Bray EA. 1999. Multiple mechanisms control the expression of abscisic acid (ABA)-requiring genes in tomato plants exposed to soil water deficit. Plant, Cell and Environment 22, 989-998.
11. Corlett JE, Wilkinson S, Thompson AJ. 1998. Diurnal control of the drought-inducible putative histone H1 gene in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 945-952.
12. Fischer RA, Sanchez M. 1979. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. II. Effects on plant water relations. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 801-814.
13. Hewlett JD, Kramer PJ. 1962. The measurement of water deficits in broadleaf plants. Protoplasm 57, 381-391.
14. Hsiao TC. 1973. Plant response to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 24, 519-570.
15. Ingram J, Bartels D. 1996. The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47, 337-403.
16. Jerzmanowski A, Przewloka M, Grasser KD. 2000. Linker histones and HMG1 proteins of higher plants. Plant Biology 2, 586-598.
17. Kahn TL, Fender SE, Bray EA, O'Connell MA. 1993. Characterization of expression of drought- and abscisic acid-regulated tomato genes in the drought-resistant species Lycopersicon pennellii. Plant Physiology 103, 597-605.
18. Kramer PJ, Boyer JS. 1995. Water relations of plants and soils. San Diego: Academic Press.
19. Lawlor DW. 2002. Limitations to photosynthesis in water-stressed leaves: stomata vs. metabolism and the role of ATP. Annals of Botany 89, 871-885.
20. Pruss D, Hayes JJ, Wolffe AP. 1995. Nucleosomal anatomy-where are the histones? Bioessays 17, 161-170.
21. Prymakowska-Bosak M, Przewloka MR, Iwkiewicz J, Egierszdorff S, Kuras M, Chaubet N, Gigot C, Spiker S, Jerzmanowski A. 1996. Histone H1 overexpressed to high level in tobacco affects certain developmental programs but has a limited effect on basal cellular functions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 10250-10255.
22. Prymakowska-Bosak M, Przewloka MR, Slusarczyk J, Kuras M, Lichota J, Kilianczyk B, Jerzmanowski A. 1999. Linker histones play a role in male meiosis and the development of pollen grains in tobacco. The Plant Cell 11, 2317-2329.
23. Przewloka MR, Wierzbicki AT, Slusarczyk J, Kuras M, Grasser KD, Stemmer C, Jerzmanowski A. 2002. The 'drought-inducible' histone His of tobacco play no role in male sterility linked to alterations in H1 variants. Planta 215, 371-379.
24. Ramon A, Muro-Pastor MA, Scazzocchio C, Gonzalez R. 2000. Deletion of the unique gene encoding a typical histone H1 has no apparent phenotype in Aspergillus nidulans. Molecular Microbiology 35, 223-233.
25. Reeves R. 1984. Transcriptionally active chromatin. Biochimica et Biophyxica Acta 782, 343-393.
26. Scippa GS, Griffiths A, Chiatante D, Bray EA. 2000. The H1 histone variant of tomato, H1-S, is targeted to the nucleus and accumulates in chromatin in response to water-deficit stress. Planta 211, 173-181.
27. Seki M, Narusaka M, Ishida J, et al. 2002. Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. The Plant Journal 31, 279-292.
28. Sharp RE. 2002. Interaction with ethylene: changing views on the role of abscisic acid in root and shoot growth responses to water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment 25, 211-222.
29. Shen X, Gorovsky MA. 1996. Linker histone H1 regulates specific gene expression but not global transcription in vivo. Cell 86, 475-483.
30. Shen X, Yu L, Weir JW, Gorovsky MA. 1995. Linker histones are not essential and affect chromatin condensation. Cell 86, 475-483.
31. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. 1996. Molecular responses to drought and cold stress. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 7, 161-167.
32. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. 1997. Gene expression and signal transduction in water-stress response. Plant Physiology 115, 327-334.
33. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. 2000. Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperature: differences and cross-talk between two stress signalling pathways. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3, 217-223.
34. Simpson RT. 1991. Nucleosome positioning: occurrence, mechanism and functional consequences. Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology 40, 73-790.
35. Slusarczyk J, Prymakowska-Bosak M, Przewloka M, Jerzmanowski A, Kuras M. 1999. Ultrastructural organization of leaves of transgenic tobacco overexpressing histone H1 from Arabidopsis thaliana. Annals of Botany 84, 329-335.
36. Thompson AJ, Corlett JE. 1995. mRNA levels of four tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill L.) genes related to fluctuating plant and soil water status. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 773-780.
37. Tomaszewski R, Jerzmanowski A. 1997. The AT-rich flanks of the oocyte-type 5S RNA gene of Xenopus laevis act as a strong local signal for histone H1-mediated chromatin reorganization in vitro. Nucleic Acids Research 25, 458-466.
38. Wei T, O'Connell MA. 1996. Structure and characterization of a putative drought-inducible H1 histone gene. Plant Molecular Biology 30, 255-268.
39. Wolffe AP, Khochbin S, Dimitrov S. 1997. What do linker histones do in chromatin? Bioessays 19, 249-255.
40. Zeevaart JAD, Creelman RA. 1988. Metabolism and physiology of abscisic acid. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 39, 439-473.