Overcoming barriers to engaging socio-economically disadvantaged populations in CHD primary prevention: A qualitative study

BMC Public Health

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Harkins, Christopher ^a   Shaw, Rebecca ^a   Gillies, Michelle ^a   Sloan, Heather ^b   Macintyre, Kate ^a   Scoular, Anne ^b   Morrison, Caroline ^b   Mackay, Fiona ^b   Cunningham, Heather ^b   Docherty, Paul ^b   Macintyre, Paul ^c   Findlay, Iain N ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b NHS GREATER GLASGOW AND CLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL MARKETING; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PRIMARY PREVENTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK FACTORS; SCOTLAND; SOCIAL MARKETING; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 77954056105     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-391     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Better Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Care - a consultation document 2008. The Scottish Government, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/233941/ 0064057.pdf
2. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case-control study. PS Yusuf S Hawken S Ounpuu T Dans A Avezum F Lanas, et al. Lancet 2004 364 937 52 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9 15364185
3. The Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Strategy for Scotland 2004. The Scottish Government, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/30859/0012660.pdf
4. National service framework for coronary heart disease - modern standards and service models 2000. Department of Health, http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/ Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPol icyAndGuidance/DH-4094275
5. Coronary heart disease trends in England and Wales from 1984 to 2004: concealed levelling of mortality rates among young adults. M O'Flaherty E Ford S Allender P Scarborough S Capewell, Heart 2008 94 178 81 10.1136/hrt.2007.118323 17641070
6. Best-practice interventions to reduce socioeconomic inequalities of coronary heart disease mortality in UK: a prospective occupational cohort study. M Kivimaki MJ Shipley JE Ferrie A Singh-Manoux GD Batty T Chandola, et al. Lancet 2008 372 9650 1648 1654 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61688-8 18994662
7. A Comparison of Methods of Recruitment to a Health Promotion Program for University Seniors. J Sarkin S Marshall K Larson K Calfas J Sallis, Preventive Medicine 1998 27 4 562 571 10.1006/pmed.1998.0327 9672950
8. Primary prevention trials in cardiovascular disease. J Pocock S Thompson, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1990 44 3 6 10.1136/jech.44.1.3 2189939
9. Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. A Yancey A Ortega S Kumanyika, Annu Rev Public Health 2006 27 1 28 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102113 16533107
10. Quantitative assessment of recruitment efforts for prevention trials in two diverse black populations. ML Fitzgibbon TE Prewitt LR Blackman P Simon A Luke LC Keys ME Avellone V Singh, Prev Med 1998 27 6 838 45 10.1006/pmed.1998. 0367 9922066
11. Effect of recruitment strategy on types of subjects entered into a primary prevention clinical trial. AC King RB Harris WL Haskell, Annals of Epidemiology 1994 4 4 312 320 7921321
12. Detailed plan for Phase Two of Have a Heart Paisley, the national health demonstration project on heart health 2005. The Scottish Government, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2005/06/09121209/12121
13. Social Marketing in Public Health. S Grier C Bryant, Annu Rev Public Health 2005 26 319 39 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144610 15760292
14. Sense of Community in the Urban Environment: A Catalyst for Participation and Community Development. DM Chavis, American Journal of Community Psychology 1990 18 1 10.1007/BF00922689
15. Ensuring the ethics and legality of disease registers: the solution of the Have a Heart Paisley Register. A Clark O Blatchford R Jamieson N Paterson I Findlay, British Journal of Healthcare Computing & Information Management 2003 20 2 44 48
16. Introducing focus groups in qualitative research. J Kitzinger, BMJ 1995 311 299 302 7633241
17. Focus groups: method or madness? In Challenge and Innovation: Methodological Advances in Social Research on HIV/AIDS. J Kitzinger, London: Falmer Press 1994 159 175
18. Analyzing and reporting focus group results. RA Krueger, Thousand Oaks CA SAGE Publications Inc 1998 6
19. Women with breast cancer talking causes: comparing content biographical and discursive analyses. S Wilkinson, Feminism and Psychology 2000 10 4 431 460 10.1177/0959353500010004003
20. Using thematic analysis in psychology. V Braun V Clarke, Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006 3 77 101 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
21. More than the sum of the parts: research methods in group interviewing. M Watts D Ebbutt, British Educational Research Journal 1987 13 25 34 10.1080/0141192870130103
22. Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research. N Mays C Pope, BMJ 1995 311 109 12 7613363
23. Checklists for improving rigous in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? R Barbour, BMJ 2001 322 115 1117 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
24. Interviewing. GM Breakwell, Research Methods in Psychology London: Sage, Breakwell GM, Hammond S, Fife-Schaw C, 1995 230 242
25. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. J Potter M Wetherell, London: Sage 1987
26. Evaluation of a mass mailing recruitment strategy to obtain a community sample of women for a clinical trial of an incontinence prevention intervention. KL Messer AR Herzog JS Seng CM Sampselle AC Diokno TE Raghunathan, et al. International Urology and Nephrology 2006 38 2 255 261 10.1007/s11255-006-0018-1 16868693
27. Mass mailings have little effect on utilization of influenza vaccine among Medicare beneficiaries. MA Maglione EG Stone PG Shekelle, American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2002 23 1 43 46 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00443-9 12093422
28. Recruitment by the Use of Mass Mailings. M McDearmon RH.Bradford, Circulation 1982 66 4 27 32
29. Nobody home?: issues of respondent recruitment in areas of deprivation. O Parry A Bancroft W Gnich A Amos, Critical Public Health 2001 11 305 317 10.1080/09581590110094585 (Pubitemid 33756375)
30. Parent recruitment and retention in a universal prevention program for child behaviour and emotional problems: barriers to research and program participation. N Heinrichs H Bertram A Kuschel K Hahlweg, Prevention Science 2005 6 4 275 286 10.1007/s11121-005-0006-1 16075192
31. Recruitment and retention of minority women in cancer screening, prevention, and treatment trials. DR Brown MN Fouad K Basen-Engquist G Tortolero-Luna, Annals of Epidemiology 2000 10 8 13 S21 10.1016/S1047-2797(00) 00197-6 11189088
32. Recruitment and retention of economically underserved women to a cervical cancer prevention trial. JM Bailey ME Bieniasz D Kmak DE Brenner MT Ruffin, Applied Nursing Research 2004 17 1 55 60 10.1016/j.apnr.2003.12.002 14991556
33. Primary prevention studies and the healthy elderly: Evaluating barriers to recruitment. M Boles WS Getchell G Feldman R McBride RG Hart, Journal of Community Health 2000 25 4 279 292 10.1023/A:1005153909429 10941692
34. Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research. LA Curry IM Nembhard EH Bradley, Circulation 2009 119 1442 1452 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742775 19289649