Recruitment and retention of economically underserved women to a cervical cancer prevention trial

Applied Nursing Research

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 55-60

  Bailey, Joanne Motiño ^a   Bieniasz, Mary E ^a   Kmak, David ^b   Brenner, Dean E ^a   Ruffin, Mack T ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PREVENTION; CHILD CARE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; NURSE PRACTITIONER; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SELECTION; PATIENT TRANSPORT; REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 1342279550     PISSN: 08971897     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2003.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blendon R., Scheck A., Donelan K., Hill C., Smith M., Beatrice O. How while and African Americans view their health and social problems. Different experiences, different expectations. Journal of the American Medical Association. 273:1995;341-347.
2. Evans M.E., Mej a-Maya L.J., Zayas L.H., Boothroyd R.A., Rodriguez O. Conducting research in culturally diverse inner-city neighborhoods Some lessons learned . Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 12:(1):2001;6-14.
3. Farrer W. Clinical trials Access and reimbursement . Cancer. 67:(6S):1991;1779S-1782S.
4. Ferris D.G., Hainer B.L., Pfenninger J.L., Zuber T.J. "See and treat" electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Journal of Family Practice. 42:(3):1996;253-257.
5. Holschneider C.H., Ghosh K., Montz F.J. See-and-treat in the management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix A resource utilization analysis . Obstetrics & Gynecology. 94:(3):1999;377-385.
6. Johansen M., Mayer D., Hoover H.C. Obstacles to implementing cancer clinical trials. Seminar Oncology Nursing. 7:1991;260-267.
7. Lovato L.C., Hill K., Hertert S., Hunninghake D.B., Probstfield J.I. Recruitment for controlled clinical trials Literature summary and annotated bibliography . Controlled Clinical Trials. 18:(4):1997;328-352.
8. McCabe M., Varricchio C., Padberg R. Efforts to recruit the economically disadvantaged to national clinical trials. Seminars in Oncology Nursing. 10:1994;123-129.
9. McKee M.D., Lurio J., Marantz P., Burton W., Mulvihill M. Barriers to follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears in an urban community health center. Archives of Family Medicine. 8:(2):1999;129-134.
10. Miller S.M., Siejak K.K., Schroeder C.M., Lerman C., Hernandez E., Helm C.W. Enhancing adherence following abnormal Pap smears among low-income minority women A preventive telephone counseling strategy . Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 89:(10):1997;703-708.
11. Morse E.V., Simon P.M., Besch C.I., Walker J. Issues of recruitment, retention, and compliance in community-based clinical trials with traditionally underserved populations. Applied Nursing Research. 8:(1):1995;8-14.
12. Swanson M., Ward A. Recruiting minorities into clinical trials Toward a participant-friendly system . Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 87:(23):1995;1747-1759.
13. Taylor K. Integrating conflicting professional roles Physician paricipation in randomized clinical trials . Social Science Medicine. 15:1992;217-224.
14. Taylor K., Margolese R., Soskolne C. Physicians' reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 310:1984;1363-1367.
15. Vollmer W.M., Osborne M.I., Hertert S., Buist A.S. Recruiting hard-to-reach subjects Is it worth the effort? Controlled Clinical Trials. 15:(2):1994;154-159. [see comments]. Comment in: Control Clin Trials 1995 Jun;16(3):182-184.