Science, Education, and the Ideology of "How"

Mind, Brain, and Education

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 49-52

  Lang, Charles ^a  

^a HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954042477     PISSN: 17512271     EISSN: 1751228X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01084.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bridgman P W. The way things are 1959, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
2. Bridgman P W. The nature of physical theory 1964, New York, Wiley
3. Bridgman P W. The logic of modern physics 1980, New York, Arno Press
4. Chitty C. Eugenics, race and intelligence in education 2007, London, Continuum International Pub. Group
5. Collins H M. Artificial experts: Social knowledge and intelligent machines 1990, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
6. Converse P. The nature of belief in mass publics 1967, 206-261. Apter DE. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (, New York, Free Press
7. Garrison M J. A measure of failure: The political origins of standardized testing 2009, Albany, NY, State University of New York Press
8. Gieryn T F. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 1983, 48:781-795.
9. Herman J L, Golan S. The effects of standardized testing on teaching and schools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 1993, 12(4):20-25.
10. Koretz D M. Limitations in the use of achievement tests as measures of educators' productivity. The Journal of Human Resources 2002, 37:752-777.
11. Kuhn T S. The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change 1977, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
12. Kuhn T S. The trouble with the historical philosophy of science 1992, Cambridge, MA, Department of the History of Science, Harvard University
13. Lauwerys J A. The philosophical approach to comparative education. International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue internationale l'éducation 1959, 5(3):281-298.
14. Lemann N. The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy 2000, New York, Farrar Straus & Giroux
15. Martin B. The critique of science becomes academic. Science, Technology, & Human Values 1993, 18(2):247-259.
16. Morris E, Anderson W B, Ward M C, Smith D. 2010, 26:268-277. http://www.springerlink.com/content/36fbv5d9xq8cn4yx, Ten signs of a good reuse management plan. (pp., Heidelberg, Springer Berlin, Retrieved February, from
17. Understanding the brain-towards a new learning science 2002, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, OECD Publishing
18. Paris S G, Lawton T A, Turner J C, Roth J L. A developmental perspective on standardized achievement testing. Educational Researcher 1991, 20(5):12-20.
19. Popham W J. Why standardized test scores don't measure educational quality. Educational Leadership 1999, 56(6):8-15.
20. Rose H. Science and society 1970, Harmondsworth, UK, Penguin Books
21. Rose H, Rose S. Rise of radical science. New Scientist 1980, 85(1188):28-29.
22. Stein Z. On the difference between designing children and raising them: Ethics and the use of educationally oriented biotechnology. Mind, Brain, and Education 2010, 4:53-67.
23. Werskey G. The Marxist critique of capitalist science: A history in three movements? Science as Culture 2007, 16:397-461.
24. Young R M. Malthus and the evolutionists: The common context of biological and social theory. Past & Present 1969, 43:109-145.
25. Young R M. Evolutionary biology and ideology: Then and now. Social Studies of Science 1971, 1(2):177-206. 10.1177/030631277100100204
26. Young R M. Science, ideology and Donna Haraway. Science as Culture 1992, 3(15):165-207.