Pan-European approach the role of business in society in Europe

Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 357-375

  Lenssen, Gilbert ^a   Vorobey, Volodja ^b  

^a College of Europesss Bruges ^*  (Poland)

^b European Academy of Business in Society   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954033331     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-26960-6_27     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. 1999. What matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42:507-525.
2. Albert, M. 1991. Capitalisme contre capitalisme. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
3. Chatman, J. A., & Jehn, K. A. 1994. Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational culture: How different can you be? Academy of Management Journal, 37:522-553.
4. Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20:92-117.
5. De Jong, H. W. 1989. The takeover market in Europe: control structures and the performance of large companies compared. Review of Industrial Organization, 6:1-18.
6. De Jong, H. W. 1996. Rijnlandse ondernemingen presteren beter. ESB: 228-232.
7. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. 1999. Ties That Bind. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
8. Franks, J. R., & Mayer, C. 1990. Capital markets and corporate control: A study of France, Germany, and the UK. Economic Policy, 10:191-231.
9. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Boston: Pitman Publishing.
10. Fombrun C., & Foss, C. 2001. The Reputation Quotient. The Gauge, May. http://www.reputationinstitute.com/sections/rank/rank.html, accessed 20.05.2004.
11. Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N., & Barnett, M. L. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1):85-106. http://www.reputationinstitute.com/sections/ rank/fombrunetal2002.pdf, accessed 20.05.2004.
12. Gelauff, G. M. M., & Den Broder, C. 1996. Governance of stakeholder relationships; the German and Dutch experience. The Hague: Centraal Plan Bureau.
13. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. 1996. Accounting and Accountability. London: Prentice-Hall.
14. Harris International. 2004. Guide to the Annual Reputation Quotient Methodology. New York.
15. Hofstede, G. 1984. Cultural Dimension in Management and Planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, January: 81-99.
16. Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and Organisation: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
17. ICMG (International Capital Markets Group). 1995. International corporate governance: Who holds the terms? London: ICMG.
18. Katz, J., Swanson, D., & Nelson, L. 1999. Culture Based expectations of Corporate Citizenship. http://info.cba.ksu.edu/Katz/Working%20Papers/culture. pdf, accessed 20.05.2004.
19. Kowalczyk, S. J., & Pawlish, M. J. 2002. Corporate Branding through External Perception of Organizational Culture. Corporate Reputation Review, 5(2-3):159-174.
20. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22:853-886.
21. Moerland, P. W. 1995a. Alternative disciplinary mechanisms in different corporate systems. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 26:17-34.
22. Moerland, P. W. 1995b. Corporate ownership and control structures: An international comparison. Review of Industrial Organization, 10:443-464.
23. O'Reilly, C., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. 1991. People and organizational culture: A Q-sort approach to assessing person-organization. Academy of Management Journal, 34:487-516.
24. Sacconi, L. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a model of "extended" corporate governance. An explanation based on the economic theories of social contract, reputation and reciprocal conformism. Liuc Papers, No. 142. Serie Etica, Diritto ed Economia 10.
25. Segal, J.-P. 2004. Pluralité des lectures politiques de la responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise en Europe. Unpublished paper. ENPC, CNRS, Gestion et Société.
26. Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20:571-610.
27. Trompenaars, F. 1997. Riding the Waves of Culture. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing Ltd.
28. Van den Berghe L., & De Ridder, L. 1999. International Standardisation of Good Corporate Governance, Best Practices for the Board of Directors. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Van den Berghe, L. 2002. Corporate Governance in a Globalising World: Convergence or Divergence? A European Perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Weimer, L., & Pape, J. C. 1999. A Taxonomy of Systems of Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance, 7(2):152-166.